Asus Strix Fusion Wireless Headset Review
be quiet! Dark Rock PRO TR4 review
MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming Z review
Palit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingPro OC review
Promo: MS Office 2016 Pro Plus Key For $31.5
Corsair IronClaw RGB mouse review
Corsair Harpoon RGB Wireless mouse review
Corsair M65 RGB ELITE game mouse review
GeForce RTX 2060 review (founder)
WD Black NVME SSD (1TB) Review
Intel is Trying to Manipulate AMD Ryzen Launch?
Yesterday in the forums somebody asked if we received Intel review guidelines from Intel for the Ryzen review as well. A very curious question, I answered no. And if they did we simply never use them as we do things our own way (as we always do).
They question itself was already curious but if we dive deeper into the story we see the claims have been made by Semi-Accurate, not the most unbiased source. Then again, we see no reason for them to make this stuff up. Also some other press apparently received that email. So yes, as it seems Intel has been reaching out to certain media in shameless attempt to influence upcoming benchmark scores in their favor. Intel's PR department is contacting media and calling in favors with the press by issuing them "guidelines" on how to review AMD Ryzen. Intel's PR emails include this line: "call us before you write."
This is the story of the day for sure. It is going to be a rough week for Intel, that's for sure. But if true, come on Intel, really?
Intel is Dropping Processor Prices in Wake of Ryzen Launch - 02/26/2017 01:27 PM
It seems that Intel is getting nervous about the AMD Ryzen launch and has started to lower prices on their processors. The equivalent 6900K model however still is 999 USD, twice as much as the Ryzen f...
Sandy Bridge chipset design flaw, Intel issues recalls - 02/01/2011 09:17 AM
Yikes -- not good -- this is just in from several web sources and now Intel confirmed it. It seems that Intel is applying
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 8145
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 8145
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5398624 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:21 AM
If Ryzen truly delivers, there will be good numbers everywhere from people.
Sites doing this favor to intel may as well "close the shop". Because this launch is very important for everyone and people will know truth soon enough.
@HH: I am not sure what set of tests you are doing with Ryzen, but would be lovely if we had geekbench included and we could see effect of different DDR4 speeds too.
It is very easy to compare different types of workloads. As some people need something particular and others are looking for different instructions.
If Ryzen truly delivers, there will be good numbers everywhere from people.
Sites doing this favor to intel may as well "close the shop". Because this launch is very important for everyone and people will know truth soon enough.
@HH: I am not sure what set of tests you are doing with Ryzen, but would be lovely if we had geekbench included and we could see effect of different DDR4 speeds too.
It is very easy to compare different types of workloads. As some people need something particular and others are looking for different instructions.
Spets
Senior Member
Posts: 2970
Joined: 2011-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2970
Joined: 2011-05-10
#5398627 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:23 AM
I stopped reading at S|A, honestly don't know why you'd bother posting anything from Charlie.
Looking forward to your review of Ryzen though, the leaked benchmarks show it really shining. At this rate my next CPU will be an AMD for sure unless Intel get their **** together (or if the leaks are fabricated
)
I stopped reading at S|A, honestly don't know why you'd bother posting anything from Charlie.
Looking forward to your review of Ryzen though, the leaked benchmarks show it really shining. At this rate my next CPU will be an AMD for sure unless Intel get their **** together (or if the leaks are fabricated
)
Brit90
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: 2016-11-08
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: 2016-11-08
#5398629 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:24 AM
Surely, if Intel is doing this (again) it is illegal?
They were doing this same thing many years ago and the EU took them to court, after they were threatening partners who would make motherboards for AMD.
It makes me want to throw my intel setup away (and I would if I could afford to).
Surely, if Intel is doing this (again) it is illegal?
They were doing this same thing many years ago and the EU took them to court, after they were threatening partners who would make motherboards for AMD.
It makes me want to throw my intel setup away (and I would if I could afford to).
koliko
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: 2005-10-27
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: 2005-10-27
#5398630 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:27 AM
Its crazy but i would say it could easy be true, if you think how much $$$ is involved here. One small "manipulation" could easy make few % diference in sale. We can use simple math to calculate how many millions USD that is
Its crazy but i would say it could easy be true, if you think how much $$$ is involved here. One small "manipulation" could easy make few % diference in sale. We can use simple math to calculate how many millions USD that is
mohiuddin
Senior Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 2010-11-06
Senior Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 2010-11-06
#5398631 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:28 AM
Hilbert, Could you please do your "RYZEN unboxing" video
Hilbert, Could you please do your "RYZEN unboxing" video
k3vst3r
Senior Member
Posts: 3348
Joined: 2009-01-03
Senior Member
Posts: 3348
Joined: 2009-01-03
#5398632 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:30 AM
Surely, if Intel is doing this (again) it is illegal?
They were doing this same thing many years ago and the EU took them to court, after they were threatening partners who would make motherboards for AMD.
It makes me want to throw my intel setup away (and I would if I could afford to).
Few billion fine, compared to vast amount of sales they took away. Pretty sure it was win/win for Intel still, even after been fined by the EU.
Surely, if Intel is doing this (again) it is illegal?
They were doing this same thing many years ago and the EU took them to court, after they were threatening partners who would make motherboards for AMD.
It makes me want to throw my intel setup away (and I would if I could afford to).
Few billion fine, compared to vast amount of sales they took away. Pretty sure it was win/win for Intel still, even after been fined by the EU.
vg24a3
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: 2013-09-23
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: 2013-09-23
#5398633 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:32 AM
I'm crossing my fingers AMD kicks Intel's ass this time, hopefully they can pull it of and really make some competition.
I'm crossing my fingers AMD kicks Intel's ass this time, hopefully they can pull it of and really make some competition.
HeavyHemi
Senior Member
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2008-10-27
Senior Member
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2008-10-27
#5398635 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:36 AM
From my reading on this, a few of the tech sites said they had the usual intel contacts when AMD announces products...or nothing out of the ordinary. As to why Charlie Douche....'makes stuff up'...if it isn't an AMD GPU or CPU he's at best, alternative facts.
From my reading on this, a few of the tech sites said they had the usual intel contacts when AMD announces products...or nothing out of the ordinary. As to why Charlie Douche....'makes stuff up'...if it isn't an AMD GPU or CPU he's at best, alternative facts.
AlmondMan
Senior Member
Posts: 435
Joined: 2007-09-03
Senior Member
Posts: 435
Joined: 2007-09-03
#5398636 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:37 AM
http://*************/intel-playing-dirty-undercut-amd-ryzen/ (wccftech) This article has an update on it. It says:
The editors-in-chief of two of America’s top PC hardware and technology publications have confirmed to Wccftech that they have indeed been approached by Intel regarding upcoming Ryzen reviews. Although both said that it was business as usual. Affirming that Intel’s response following AMD’s Ryzen announcement was what they had expected it to be. Adding that nothing was particularly unusual about the emails they received from Intel.
http://*************/intel-playing-dirty-undercut-amd-ryzen/ (wccftech) This article has an update on it. It says:
The editors-in-chief of two of America’s top PC hardware and technology publications have confirmed to Wccftech that they have indeed been approached by Intel regarding upcoming Ryzen reviews. Although both said that it was business as usual. Affirming that Intel’s response following AMD’s Ryzen announcement was what they had expected it to be. Adding that nothing was particularly unusual about the emails they received from Intel.
HeavyHemi
Senior Member
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2008-10-27
Senior Member
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2008-10-27
#5398637 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:39 AM
http://*************/intel-playing-dirty-undercut-amd-ryzen/ (wccftech) This article has an update on it. It says:
The editors-in-chief of two of America’s top PC hardware and technology publications have confirmed to Wccftech that they have indeed been approached by Intel regarding upcoming Ryzen reviews. Although both said that it was business as usual. Affirming that Intel’s response following AMD’s Ryzen announcement was what they had expected it to be. Adding that nothing was particularly unusual about the emails they received from Intel.
Missed it by a minute
http://*************/intel-playing-dirty-undercut-amd-ryzen/ (wccftech) This article has an update on it. It says:
The editors-in-chief of two of America’s top PC hardware and technology publications have confirmed to Wccftech that they have indeed been approached by Intel regarding upcoming Ryzen reviews. Although both said that it was business as usual. Affirming that Intel’s response following AMD’s Ryzen announcement was what they had expected it to be. Adding that nothing was particularly unusual about the emails they received from Intel.
Missed it by a minute
thatguy91
Senior Member
Posts: 6650
Joined: 2010-08-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6650
Joined: 2010-08-27
#5398638 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:41 AM
Currently Ryzen only supports a limited set of DDR4 speeds. It's not a hardware limitation, it's just because AMD's focus has been on performance and not overclocked memory compatibility. The benefits from the focus on performance outweighed the potential performance increase of focussing on high speed RAM compatibility. Apparently within a month or so there will be new microcode available, it will then be up the the manufacturer to update the relevant bios. Enthusiasts can update the microcode and other modules manually, but hopefully they won't be slack.
So far it may mean that you are limited to mid DDR4-2xxx speeds, after the microcode update supposedly you could use speeds up to mid DDR4-3xxx and probably higher.
It would be good therefore that after the microcode is released and bios is available that a comparative review is done between say, DDR4-2400 on the new bios and the review system, everything else the same, and then the benefit of DDR4-3200 and higher on the new bios.
Currently Ryzen only supports a limited set of DDR4 speeds. It's not a hardware limitation, it's just because AMD's focus has been on performance and not overclocked memory compatibility. The benefits from the focus on performance outweighed the potential performance increase of focussing on high speed RAM compatibility. Apparently within a month or so there will be new microcode available, it will then be up the the manufacturer to update the relevant bios. Enthusiasts can update the microcode and other modules manually, but hopefully they won't be slack.
So far it may mean that you are limited to mid DDR4-2xxx speeds, after the microcode update supposedly you could use speeds up to mid DDR4-3xxx and probably higher.
It would be good therefore that after the microcode is released and bios is available that a comparative review is done between say, DDR4-2400 on the new bios and the review system, everything else the same, and then the benefit of DDR4-3200 and higher on the new bios.
AlmondMan
Senior Member
Posts: 435
Joined: 2007-09-03
Senior Member
Posts: 435
Joined: 2007-09-03
#5398643 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:51 AM
Currently Ryzen only supports a limited set of DDR4 speeds. It's not a hardware limitation, it's just because AMD's focus has been on performance and not overclocked memory compatibility. The benefits from the focus on performance outweighed the potential performance increase of focussing on high speed RAM compatibility. Apparently within a month or so there will be new microcode available, it will then be up the the manufacturer to update the relevant bios. Enthusiasts can update the microcode and other modules manually, but hopefully they won't be slack.
So far it may mean that you are limited to mid DDR4-2xxx speeds, after the microcode update supposedly you could use speeds up to mid DDR4-3xxx and probably higher.
It would be good therefore that after the microcode is released and bios is available that a comparative review is done between say, DDR4-2400 on the new bios and the review system, everything else the same, and then the benefit of DDR4-3200 and higher on the new bios.
Higher RAM speeds seldom yield much benefit, inside the type of RAM used (there's generally been benefits to increasin from type to type, though ddr3->4 showed kind of meh gains for performance). Some tasks are boosted by it, but usualy not much.
Currently Ryzen only supports a limited set of DDR4 speeds. It's not a hardware limitation, it's just because AMD's focus has been on performance and not overclocked memory compatibility. The benefits from the focus on performance outweighed the potential performance increase of focussing on high speed RAM compatibility. Apparently within a month or so there will be new microcode available, it will then be up the the manufacturer to update the relevant bios. Enthusiasts can update the microcode and other modules manually, but hopefully they won't be slack.
So far it may mean that you are limited to mid DDR4-2xxx speeds, after the microcode update supposedly you could use speeds up to mid DDR4-3xxx and probably higher.
It would be good therefore that after the microcode is released and bios is available that a comparative review is done between say, DDR4-2400 on the new bios and the review system, everything else the same, and then the benefit of DDR4-3200 and higher on the new bios.
Higher RAM speeds seldom yield much benefit, inside the type of RAM used (there's generally been benefits to increasin from type to type, though ddr3->4 showed kind of meh gains for performance). Some tasks are boosted by it, but usualy not much.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1335
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1335
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5398646 Posted on: 02/27/2017 09:53 AM
Asus and Gigabyte already did list up to 3200, though.
So far it may mean that you are limited to mid DDR4-2xxx speeds, after the microcode update supposedly you could use speeds up to mid DDR4-3xxx and probably higher.
Asus and Gigabyte already did list up to 3200, though.
bonomork
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2013-09-23
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2013-09-23
#5398648 Posted on: 02/27/2017 10:02 AM
Absolutely disgusting practise, if it is indeed true.
I've already hastily pre-ordered an 1700X and Asrock X370 Taichi, unless HH's review brings up something truly terrible on March 2nd then it'll be replacing my 2500k that's already getting a bit long in the tooth especially for video editing.
Intel need to sort their practises out, AMD are bringing their A game.
If true it's unfair competition.
Absolutely disgusting practise, if it is indeed true.
I've already hastily pre-ordered an 1700X and Asrock X370 Taichi, unless HH's review brings up something truly terrible on March 2nd then it'll be replacing my 2500k that's already getting a bit long in the tooth especially for video editing.
Intel need to sort their practises out, AMD are bringing their A game.
If true it's unfair competition.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 835
Joined: 2004-04-03
Absolutely disgusting practise, if it is indeed true.
I've already hastily pre-ordered an 1700X and Asrock X370 Taichi, unless HH's review brings up something truly terrible on March 2nd then it'll be replacing my 2500k that's already getting a bit long in the tooth especially for video editing.
Intel need to sort their practises out, AMD are bringing their A game.