Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 WHQL driver download
GeForce 516.59 WHQL driver download
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.22 Download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download v4.06.10.651
CrystalDiskInfo 8.17 Download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 Windows 7 driver download
ReShade download v5.2.2
HWiNFO Download v7.26
7-Zip v22.00 Download


New Forum Topics
AMD Radeon Software - UWP [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) Collapse of crypto mining industry leads to auctioning off of thousands of graphics cards AMD VRR issue LG OLED CX NVIDIA GeForce 516.59 WHQL driver download & Discussion According to Asus and Gigabyte, motherboard sales will fall by 25% this year. Is it a good time to get a 3060ti or wait? Free to grab: three games at Epic Game Store When is "Downscaling" worth it? (DLDSR, etc) PlayStation 3 emulator increases its CPU performance by 30% with AVX-512




Guru3D.com » News » Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock

Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 04/16/2013 07:50 AM | source: | 25 comment(s)
Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock

Some leaked PDF files that have been shown on IDF make it clear that Haswell will be easier to overclock. Intel said improvements have been made to the way you can overclock Haswell, making the process similar to tweaking Sandy Bridge-E CPUs. Interesting to see BTW is that the core multiplier ratios will go up to 80 with Haswell, nice.

Haswell should be fairly similar to the say the Core i7 3820 (Sandy Bridge-E) as it will allow both multiplier based overclocking and base clock overclocking when multipliers are locked in. You will be able to tweak your baseclock by 5-7% at three different presents – 100MHz, 125MHz and 167MHz. The reason why Intel quotes only 5-7% variance at those presets is because too much BCLK changing can cause instability in the PCI-Express and DMI-PLL. It is good to know that you will be able to overclock the chips, not just the K versions. There will be three base frequencies to which a multiplier can be applied: 100 MHz, 125 MHz, and 166 MHz. Several uncore frequency ratios will adjust themselves to compensate, thus leaving their stability unaffected.

Haswell will get integrated voltage regulation too  brininging each CPU an integrated VRM controller. Unlocked “-K” chips remain to have an as they can reach 8 GHz record (subzero cooling) as their base clock multiplier for the CPU cores are higher than on the others, of up to 80.0x for 100 MHz, up to 64.0x for 125 MHz, and up to 48.0x for 166 MHz.

Memory overclocking is going to be popular with Haswell. Intel is to  offer support for 200 MHz steps up to 2.6GHz and 266MHz steps up to 2.66GHz on memory frequency. The maxed out memory data rate supported will be a nice 2.93GHz !



Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock




« Habey PRO-6820 Fanless Core i7 Quad-Core System · Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock · Gigabyte Aivia Neon Air Presenter Mouse »

Related Stories

Intel Haswell is around the corner GT3e spotted - 04/12/2013 10:09 AM
Over at the Asain edition of Intel's IDF a photo was taken of a Haswell processor with the heatspreader removed. This is thwe GT3e version of the CPU, a quad-core model with on-board RAM. Thus far In...

Intel Haswell Xeons get up to 15 cores - 04/03/2013 08:41 AM
CPU World has shown details about Intel's upcoming Haswell-based Xeon processors, you can read it over here. Xeon E7 v2 will arrive in Q4 2013, while Xeon E5-2600 v2 will launch a quarter earlier. Xe...

Noctua provides free mounting kit upgrades for Intel Haswell - 03/19/2013 04:02 PM
Noctua is being classy again as they announced that owners of its older heatsinks that don't include a SecuFirm2 mounting system are able to order a free NM-i115x mounting kit upgrade to make their c...

Intel Haswell to arrive in low volume until USB 3.0 issue is fixed - 03/15/2013 08:40 AM
Intel will slowdown the ramp of its new Haswell platform until it has fixed a USB 3.0 issue in the Haswell platform that causes some relatively minor issues when a system wakes from S3 sleep mode with...

Intel halts their own branded motherboards - 01/23/2013 10:04 AM
Intel indicated that ovre the next three years they will stop manufacturing their own branded motherboards. Well, they actually purchase them from big ODM's themselves but yeah that production will ...


5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Moegames
Senior Member



Posts: 107
Joined: 2002-05-05

#4579108 Posted on: 04/18/2013 06:15 AM
PS i sorta had to crack up when i read the title "Intel Haswell to be easier to overclock" lol

Some nice thought-out PR there

PhazeDelta1
Senior Member



Posts: 15616
Joined: 2010-09-12

#4579113 Posted on: 04/18/2013 06:29 AM
Easier? I didn't know it was hard to overclock.

JohnMaclane
Senior Member



Posts: 4824
Joined: 2004-05-20

#4579483 Posted on: 04/18/2013 07:16 PM
Good, good. Higher OCs will compensate a little bit for the lack of proper increases in frequency and clock for clock performance over the last FIVE YEARS. Welcome to the lack of competition.

Honestly it feels like 1 step above Nehalem, and those were released in 2008 weren't they? In fact I'm still using a Nehalem chip and I'm not the only one.

The market is really pointing in a different direction. It's smaller bumps in performance in constantly smaller form factors.

kens30
Senior Member



Posts: 1209
Joined: 2008-10-08

#4579511 Posted on: 04/18/2013 07:56 PM
Good, good. Higher OCs will compensate a little bit for the lack of proper increases in frequency and clock for clock performance over the last FIVE YEARS. Welcome to the lack of competition.

Honestly it feels like 1 step above Nehalem, and those were released in 2008 weren't they? In fact I'm still using a Nehalem chip and I'm not the only one.

It's the lack of competition like you mentioned that is holding greater increases in cpu performance back.And your right about feeling like 1 step above Nehalem.
If only Amd's 8 core cpu's were on par or outperformed Intel's core i7 cpu's on per clock performance i am sure we would be seeing greater increases than 10 to 15% each generation.

scoter man1
Senior Member



Posts: 4866
Joined: 2008-12-09

#4579783 Posted on: 04/19/2013 05:23 AM
The market is really pointing in a different direction. It's smaller bumps in performance in constantly smaller form factors.


Plus higher efficiency, but I guess that comes along with smaller form factors.

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022