Intel Core Series 9000 Specifications published - merely 100 and 200 MHz speed bumps

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/04/2018 08:30 AM | source: | 66 comment(s)

Yesterday we reported that Intel to be releasing Coffee lake based six and eight-core part in the 9000 series with processors like the Core i5-9600(K). We can advance a bit more on that as the specification leaked as well, the procs are a respin of the current ones, with 100 to 200 MHz clock frequency increases.

Intel will house the new procs shared over the Core i5 (6-core) and Core i7 (8-core)line. The processors all will be a series 9000 model and based on Coffee Lake architecture. Intel now shows specifications of the mentioned processors, Hardware info spotted and the 9000 series CPU's are clocked approximately 100 to 200MHz higher than their 8000 series counterparts. A microcode update guidance file reveals Coffee Lake S series featuring whats listed as six and four core configurations, the models listed are:

Core i5-9600(K)
Core i5-9500(T)
Core i3-9100
Core i3-9000

That means it's confirmed that Intel will be using 8th gen processors in the 9000 lineups.

Intel	Cores / Threads	Base Clock	Turbo Clock	TDP
Core i7-8086K	6C / 12T	4.0 GHz	5.0 GHz	95W
Core i7-8700K	6C / 12T	3.7 GHz	4.7 GHz	95W
Core i7-8700	6C / 12T	3.2 GHz	4.6 GHz	65W
Core i5-9600K	6C / 6T	3.7 GHz	4.5 GHz	95W
Core i5-8600K	6C / 6T	3.6 GHz	4.3 GHz	95W
Core i5-9600	6C / 6T	3.1 GHz	4.5 GHz	65W
Core i5-8600	6C / 6T	3.1 GHz	4.3 GHz	65W
Core i5-9500	6C / 6T	3.0 GHz	4.3 GHz	65W
Core i5-8500	6C / 6T	3.0 GHz	4.1 GHz	65W
Core i5-9400	6C / 6T	2.9 GHz	4.1 GHz	65W
Core i5-8400	6C / 6T	2.8 GHz	4.0 GHz	65W
Core i3-8350K	4C / 4T	4.0 GHz		95W
Core i3-8300	4C / 4T	3.7 GHz		62W
Core i3-9100	4C / 4T	3.7 GHz		65W
Core i3-8100	4C / 4T	3.6 GHz		65W
Core i3-9000	4C / 4T	3.7 GHz		65W
Core i3-8000	4C / 4T	3.6 GHz		65W

Source: Hardware info

Related Stories

Intel Coffee lake Core i9 9900K and other product names leaked? - 06/27/2018 10:03 PM
So much speculation on the Z390 chipset and the 8-core processors that go along with it, the news kind of gets lost in space eh? We talked Z390 for quite a while now. We know it's paired with at l...

Intel confirms it will release their first high-end GPU in 2020 - 06/12/2018 09:18 PM
Pretty much as expected, Intel is working on a dedicated GPU that Intel which is now confirmed to be released in 2020. Intels first real GPU likely will end up as graphics accelerator for artificia...

Intel Core i7-8086K CPU Turbo bins are Close To Similar to 8700K - 06/11/2018 05:20 PM
Over at Computex last week, Intel announced the anniversary edition Core i7-8086K, which they kind of did silently. Probably there was a good reason for that. The processor is advertised as 5 GHz pr...

Intel Core i7-8086K anniversary edition CPU gets listed at retailers (updated) - 05/31/2018 07:47 AM
And yes, it surfaces again. Remember that nostalgic sounding 8086 processor rumor we reported a while ago? Intel could be planning a special processor to be released with the 40th anniversary of the...

Unannounced Intel Core i7 8086K Spotted - 04/15/2018 05:38 PM
Yes, you read that right, an 8086 processor. So then, Intel might be planning a special processor to be released with the 40th anniversary of the 8086 processor?...

14 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

sverek

Posts: 5754
Joined: 2011-01-02

#5562483 Posted on: 07/04/2018 09:49 AM

Boring. Wake me up when we have some concrete info on i9-9900K 8c/16t

I have very secret concrete info, DO NOT spread it without my confirmation:
It will cost over $9000 and heat would be over 9000°C

BigMaMaInHouse
Senior Member

Posts: 137
Joined: 2016-10-11

#5562490 Posted on: 07/04/2018 10:16 AM

The sad truth is that without Ryzen- i7 8700K could be 7700K with same 100~200 Mhz boost with new MB and chipset...

But most of the "Gamers" don't remember this, and for the 5% @720P~1080P performance boost they choose to pay to Intel Again- instead Helping AMD to keep the competition.
I get it when AMD had only FX 83XX and performace difference was massive, but now when the gap is less then 5%? those "Gamers" do deserve to be stuck with Intel's WalletRippers :mad:

.
Those CPU's are almost same as 6700K that was released 3 years ago! and now another "Update" you get 9X00 series-LOL.
https://ark.intel.com/products/88195/Intel-Core-i7-6700K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4-20-GHz
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_2700_review,9.html

Fox2232
Senior Member

Posts: 9956
Joined: 2012-07-20

#5562491 Posted on: 07/04/2018 10:17 AM

Well, on one side it is "only 100~200MHz", on other side they may be good CPUs if price is good.
Someone with recent intel can shed some light:
Can non-K CPU like i5-9600 be told that it has Power Limit of 125W same way as with K chips? If yes, then one can get decent performance on all cores. (But they should have increase base clock here too, as in worst case scenario it will be no better than i5-8600.)
And then i5-9600K. Who cares about stock turbo clock? Owner is going to tweak it anyway.

moeppel
Senior Member

Posts: 151
Joined: 2015-06-30

#5562493 Posted on: 07/04/2018 10:21 AM

Your brain is pile of crap.
How many cores should (the new) i7 have by that twisted logic then?

It's not about cores but about the fact that AMD literally obliterated Intel's artificial market segmentation.

Intel needs a new segmentation direly, unless of course people keep preferring 6/6 over 6/12 - but even that I'd expect to stop come '19 / '20.

The i5 line has been Intel's articifical crippled redheaded stepchild for generations now, solely because they could. They cannot anymore. Well, shouldn't anyway.

sverek
Senior Member

Posts: 5754
Joined: 2011-01-02

#5562497 Posted on: 07/04/2018 10:48 AM

Intel having a heart attack with it's "tick-tock" scenario.
Been "tock" for a damn while now

14 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.