MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Intel Core i9-11900K processor breaks 1900 point barrier - Updated: Photos of Packaging
While the Core i9-11900K appeared on Geekbench a while ago where it managed to break a record, more photos now have surfaced the web.
The proc scores 1905 points (i9-11900K) in the Geekbench V5 single-core benchmark, and that places it 35% above its predecessor and allowed it to break the record for the highest single-core result obtained at stock frequencies, showing the power of Intel's new architecture.
With 8 cores and 16 threads, it also offers similar results to the 20-thread 10900K in the multi-core benchmark. Therefore, the new Rocket Lake-S series processor could be more than an interesting option for both gaming and multi-threaded tasks. Using this data for comparison, the Core i9-11900K could be 12-13% faster than AMD's flagship processor, the Ryzen 5950X, in the single-core benchmark. However, in multi-core tests, the red team's processor is still 47-53% faster due to its 32 threads (twice that of the 11900K).
Intel has yet to confirm the exact release date of its 11th. Generation of Intel Core, although it is rumored that the new series could be launched in March. However, it remains to be seen if there will be available at the moment.
Update: Some photos of funky-looking retail packaging for the pending Core i9 series have just surfaced. Of course in blue, the Core i9-11900K has a bendy shape. The i9-11900KFw ould however see a basic paperboard box sans cooler. Below the artwork leaked at Videocardz.
Intel Core i9-11900K ES and Core i7-11700 ES prices leaked in china - 12/28/2020 09:38 AM
Over at Chiphell prices of ES based Core i9-11900K ES and Core i7-11700 have popped up. Take them with a grain of salt of course, but considering the leaker also has been posting CPU-Z screenshots of ...
Intel Core i9-11900 and i9-11900K (ES) CPU-Z Benchmarks Surface and shows 12% Gain - 12/21/2020 09:35 AM
Two new Rocket Lake for desktop screenshots have been spotted, the eight-core Core i9-11900 and i9-11900K. Judging from the results returned, they show a gain of 12%....
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Beats Intel Core i5-10600K - 10/20/2020 07:53 AM
And before I continue the news item, that Core i5-10600Khas a 125W TDP, the AMD one ...65 Watts. Anyhow, meet the Ryzen 5 5600X CPU. TUM_APISAK stumbled into some entries at the SiSoftware Sandra ...
Intel Could Fight off AMD Ryzen 5000 just based on lower prices - 10/13/2020 07:55 AM
You all will have noticed that AMD's Ryzen 5000 is seeing a pretty significant price premium, all processors have gotten an uplift of 50 USD per proc seen over the current generation. And that opens ...
Intel Corporate Vice President and Chief Communications Officer Claire Dixon Resigns - 09/07/2020 07:47 AM
Intel had hired Claire Dixon in June 2019 to lead corporate communications and events as director of communications and corporate vice president. The company mentions that his departure was for person...
Kraagenskul
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2017-08-08
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2017-08-08
#5885612 Posted on: 02/09/2021 11:43 AM
Why anyone would sacrifice a 50% multi-core performance advantage to gain 10% single IPC is beyond me.
Ryzen 5900X all the way.
If you spend 90% of your PC time gaming then your personally adjusted perceived cpu performance is heavily pondered by cpu single core performance (or ''low core count applications''). It's a specific use but a very common one.
Why anyone would sacrifice a 50% multi-core performance advantage to gain 10% single IPC is beyond me.
Ryzen 5900X all the way.
If you spend 90% of your PC time gaming then your personally adjusted perceived cpu performance is heavily pondered by cpu single core performance (or ''low core count applications''). It's a specific use but a very common one.
mackintosh
Senior Member
Posts: 338
Joined: 2012-11-28
Senior Member
Posts: 338
Joined: 2012-11-28
#5885613 Posted on: 02/09/2021 11:47 AM
Basically what Kraagenskul just said. Gamers. You don't need 50% multi core advantage, but 10% IPC is definitely noticeable in average gaming loads. This may change, but not in the foreseeable future. By the time it does, Zen3 will be long forgotten.
Basically what Kraagenskul just said. Gamers. You don't need 50% multi core advantage, but 10% IPC is definitely noticeable in average gaming loads. This may change, but not in the foreseeable future. By the time it does, Zen3 will be long forgotten.
Webhiker
Senior Member
Posts: 727
Joined: 2011-03-23
Senior Member
Posts: 727
Joined: 2011-03-23
#5885615 Posted on: 02/09/2021 11:53 AM
Without looking at frame rates, I seriously doubt you would notice a 10% single core IPC in a game.
Basically what Kraagenskul just said. Gamers. You don't need 50% multi core advantage, but 10% IPC is definitely noticeable in average gaming loads. This may change, but not in the foreseeable future. By the time it does, Zen3 will be long forgotten.
Without looking at frame rates, I seriously doubt you would notice a 10% single core IPC in a game.
Kraagenskul
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2017-08-08
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2017-08-08
#5885616 Posted on: 02/09/2021 11:59 AM
I doubt like you, but if you don't use any heavy multithreaded applications then we are 100% sure that you can't perceive even a 4000% advantage in it : )
Without looking at frame rates, I seriously doubt you would notice a 10% single core IPC in a game.
I doubt like you, but if you don't use any heavy multithreaded applications then we are 100% sure that you can't perceive even a 4000% advantage in it : )
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 727
Joined: 2011-03-23
Why anyone would sacrifice a 50% multi-core performance advantage to gain 10% single IPC is beyond me.
Ryzen 5900X all the way.