ASUS ROG STRIX Scope keyboard review
GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super WTF review
ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT THICC III Ultra review
Promo: URcdkey Halloween sale Windows 10 Pro for 11$
Guru3D Rig of the Month - October 2019
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X review
Gigabyte GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING OC review
Palit GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GamingPRO OC review
Intel Core i7-5960X, Core i7-5930K and Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPUs Specs Out
As you guys know, Intel is planning to release the next-gen Haswell-E processors for the enthusiast platform (X99) later this year. Recently, Coolaler posted an article with details and specifications of three of the upcoming Haswell-E processors, namely the Intel Core i7-5960X, Core i7-5930K and Core i7-5820K. Check out the detailed specifications after the break.
Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Haswell-E
Haswell-E will have one X-type processor or the Extreme processor, and two K-series or the unlock processors. The Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Haswell-E processor, being the flagship CPU, features a total of 8 cores / 16 threads and has Hyper Threading. It has a base clock of 3.GHz with 20MB cache and will support DDR4 memory. It will also support multiple graphics card configuration with the first two cards running at x16 speed and the third one running at x8 speed. It will also have a maximum PCI Express link speed of 8GT/s and a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 140W.
Intel Core i7-5930K and Core i7-5820K Haswell-E
The Extreme processor is followed by two Core i7 processors with unlock multipliers – the Intel Core i7-5930K and Core i7-5820K Haswell-E. Both processors features 6 cores / 12 threads, also with Hyper Threading, and has a base clock of 3.5GHz and 3.3GHz respectively. The Intel Core i7-5930K and Core i7-5820K will also support DDR4 memory and a memory frequency of 2133MHz. Both processors are somewhat the same, but they differ in the PCI Express configuration. The Core i7-5930K will have 2 x16 + 1 x8 configuration, similar with the Core i7-5960X; meanwhile the Core i7-5820K will only support 1 x16 + 1 x8 + 1 x4 multiple graphics card configuration.
It seems that the Intel Core i7-5930K will be the sweet spot processor here, unless Intel will change the specs before officially releasing it, or announce another “better” Haswell-E processor along the way. Via thepcenthusiast and coaler, see source link.
Note: The specifications provided here is still a rumor and is yet to be confirmed. Until then, the information should be taken with a grain of salt.
Intel Core i7 4790 processor review - 05/12/2014 06:22 PM
We just published a review on the all new Intel Core i7 4790 flagship quad-core processor. The long awaited Haswell refresh is finally official, Join us as we look at the performance of this proce...
Gigabyte BRIX Ultra now with Haswell based Intel Core CPUs - 09/07/2013 07:54 AM
Gigabyte is proud to announce the next generation GIGABYTE BRIX compact PC kit with new models featuring the latest 4th generation Intel Core processors. The new GIGABYTE BRIX is available in four mo...
Intel Core i7 4820K and 4960X Ivy Bridge-E processor review - 09/05/2013 08:04 AM
In todays reviews we test the new four-core Core i7 4820K and six-core Core i7 4960X Ivy Bridge-E (IBE) processor. The 4820K is the only quad-core IBE processor that Intel will release. But it is u...
Intel Core i7-4770K clocked to 7068.52MHz - 08/17/2013 08:33 AM
In a press-release MSI informs us that a new overclocking record has been set with its Z87 XPOWER motherboard. The Overclocking Knights managed to overclock Intel's Core i7-4770K to a wwhopping 7068...
Intel Core i7 4771 benchmarks surface, as fast as 4770 - 07/31/2013 01:11 PM
Intel is will launch its Core i7 4771 in the fall to take its premium line to 2014 when it plans to launch a refresh of Haswell. VR-Zone got its hands on a copy of the chip early to run some benchmark...
k3vst3r
Senior Member
Posts: 3351
Joined: 2009-01-03
Senior Member
Posts: 3351
Joined: 2009-01-03
#4826150 Posted on: 05/27/2014 11:21 AM
It's basically top card will get 16x an next card 8x an 3rd card 4x
remember it's not the chipset, but actual chip which has the lanes....5820k will be bottom end chip
OK, not sure I understand the PCI Express configurations, are they saying that the 5820K will support X16 with 1 card installed and only X8 X8 when running CF or SLI? That can't be right surely for the top end chipset can it?
It's basically top card will get 16x an next card 8x an 3rd card 4x
remember it's not the chipset, but actual chip which has the lanes....5820k will be bottom end chip
D4rKy21
Senior Member
Posts: 724
Joined: 2007-10-08
Senior Member
Posts: 724
Joined: 2007-10-08
#4826152 Posted on: 05/27/2014 11:23 AM
For an 8 core those stock-speeds are pretty low i gues.
For an 8 core those stock-speeds are pretty low i gues.
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 2732
Joined: 2009-09-08
Senior Member
Posts: 2732
Joined: 2009-09-08
#4826157 Posted on: 05/27/2014 11:27 AM
The more cores you add, the more you decrease the clock speeds because of thermal constraints, if i´m not mistaken.
Anyway i´m interested and curious about the entry CPU, the 5820K. If it costs the same as the 4820K, then i could buy a very decent gaming machine with the a six core CPU instead of going with an 4790K.
For an 8 core those stock-speeds are pretty low i gues.
The more cores you add, the more you decrease the clock speeds because of thermal constraints, if i´m not mistaken.
Anyway i´m interested and curious about the entry CPU, the 5820K. If it costs the same as the 4820K, then i could buy a very decent gaming machine with the a six core CPU instead of going with an 4790K.
kenoh
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2012-08-17
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2012-08-17
#4826181 Posted on: 05/27/2014 11:57 AM
These cards are expected in September, right? For the PCI-E specifications, does the 5820k only do 16x-8x-3x in PCI-E 3.0? 8x being 16x in PCI-E 2.0?
If so then that would be nice because current graphic cards haven't maxed out the PCI-E 2.0 specification "not till Nvidia's Pascal" which would be the 900 series with a rated bandwidth of up to 1gbs but I guess that wouldn't matter anyways because we would need new motherboards that would support NVLink to fully use it!
That won't be the case till Skylake CPU's and the 200 series motherboards arive?
These cards are expected in September, right? For the PCI-E specifications, does the 5820k only do 16x-8x-3x in PCI-E 3.0? 8x being 16x in PCI-E 2.0?
If so then that would be nice because current graphic cards haven't maxed out the PCI-E 2.0 specification "not till Nvidia's Pascal" which would be the 900 series with a rated bandwidth of up to 1gbs but I guess that wouldn't matter anyways because we would need new motherboards that would support NVLink to fully use it!
That won't be the case till Skylake CPU's and the 200 series motherboards arive?
kenoh
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2012-08-17
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2012-08-17
#4826189 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:06 PM
The more cores you add, the more you decrease the clock speeds because of thermal constraints, if i´m not mistaken.
Anyway i´m interested and curious about the entry CPU, the 5820K. If it costs the same as the 4820K, then i could buy a very decent gaming machine with the a six core CPU instead of going with an 4790K.My guess is the 5820k with have a $150 premium, so more like $450.00 for entry, $650.00 for the 5930k and $850.00 for the 5960x and $1000.00 for a 5970x variant?
The more cores you add, the more you decrease the clock speeds because of thermal constraints, if i´m not mistaken.
Anyway i´m interested and curious about the entry CPU, the 5820K. If it costs the same as the 4820K, then i could buy a very decent gaming machine with the a six core CPU instead of going with an 4790K.My guess is the 5820k with have a $150 premium, so more like $450.00 for entry, $650.00 for the 5930k and $850.00 for the 5960x and $1000.00 for a 5970x variant?
Matt26LFC
Senior Member
Posts: 3061
Joined: 2008-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 3061
Joined: 2008-01-06
#4826191 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:09 PM
It's basically top card will get 16x an next card 8x an 3rd card 4x
remember it's not the chipset, but actual chip which has the lanes....5820k will be bottom end chip
Oh rite, shame you don't get a few more lanes on this chip, X16 X8 X8 would have been nice, seeing X4 on Haswell E and X99 just seems underwhelming since its Top End and will be for a few years. It probably will be Skylake E that gets the next big chipset and that won't be around for a good while yet.
It's basically top card will get 16x an next card 8x an 3rd card 4x
remember it's not the chipset, but actual chip which has the lanes....5820k will be bottom end chip
Oh rite, shame you don't get a few more lanes on this chip, X16 X8 X8 would have been nice, seeing X4 on Haswell E and X99 just seems underwhelming since its Top End and will be for a few years. It probably will be Skylake E that gets the next big chipset and that won't be around for a good while yet.
Ven0m
Senior Member
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2005-08-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2005-08-12
#4826199 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:22 PM
We'll have yet to see turbo speeds. 3GHz base for 8-core Extreme may look kinda disappointing. However if they offer good boost speeds, like in case of laptops, it may look completely different.
Also, it may be much better to get "good old" 4770k / 4790k for a gaming rig, as they should offer great clock speeds at lower power usage and less money, which should be more than enough for games and general computer usage. Also, the motherboards are cheaper for such CPUs. However for workstations, usually more cores = better.
We'll have yet to see turbo speeds. 3GHz base for 8-core Extreme may look kinda disappointing. However if they offer good boost speeds, like in case of laptops, it may look completely different.
Also, it may be much better to get "good old" 4770k / 4790k for a gaming rig, as they should offer great clock speeds at lower power usage and less money, which should be more than enough for games and general computer usage. Also, the motherboards are cheaper for such CPUs. However for workstations, usually more cores = better.
drac
Senior Member
Posts: 1747
Joined: 2003-10-27
Senior Member
Posts: 1747
Joined: 2003-10-27
#4826202 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:26 PM
Prices... hmm hmmmm
Prices... hmm hmmmm
0655
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 2014-05-22
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 2014-05-22
#4826206 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:32 PM
CPU-Z Core i7-5960X ES
www coolaler.com/showthread.php/315765
CPU-Z Core i7-5960X ES
www coolaler.com/showthread.php/315765
kenoh
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2012-08-17
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2012-08-17
#4826209 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:33 PM
Prices... hmm hmmmm
I would expect the prices to be 5820k ($450), 5930k ($650), 5960x ($850)), 5970x ($1000)
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1236
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1236
Joined: 2003-04-26
#4826212 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:38 PM
Wow, what a joke. Premium platform and Intel makes the 5820K a trashcan.
Wow, what a joke. Premium platform and Intel makes the 5820K a trashcan.
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 2732
Joined: 2009-09-08
Senior Member
Posts: 2732
Joined: 2009-09-08
#4826221 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:47 PM
If those are the prices then Intel can keep them...
My guess is the 5820k with have a $150 premium, so more like $450.00 for entry, $650.00 for the 5930k and $850.00 for the 5960x and $1000.00 for a 5970x variant?
If those are the prices then Intel can keep them...
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12378
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12378
Joined: 2004-05-16
#4826222 Posted on: 05/27/2014 12:47 PM
The entry level of Ivybridge E (I forget the model) was cheaper than the 3770K.
I don't see the problem. If your work requires more cores go with E, if not don't. It's that simple.
Wow, what a joke. Premium platform and Intel makes the 5820K a trashcan.
The entry level of Ivybridge E (I forget the model) was cheaper than the 3770K.
I don't see the problem. If your work requires more cores go with E, if not don't. It's that simple.
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 5882
Joined: 2010-10-17
Senior Member
Posts: 5882
Joined: 2010-10-17
#4826236 Posted on: 05/27/2014 01:05 PM
The entry level of Ivybridge E (I forget the model) was cheaper than the 3770K.
I don't see the problem. If your work requires more cores go with E, if not don't. It's that simple.
Exactly. I do audio work, hence 6 cores.
The entry level of Ivybridge E (I forget the model) was cheaper than the 3770K.
I don't see the problem. If your work requires more cores go with E, if not don't. It's that simple.
Exactly. I do audio work, hence 6 cores.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3061
Joined: 2008-01-06
OK, not sure I understand the PCI Express configurations, are they saying that the 5820K will support X16 with 1 card installed and only X8 X8 when running CF or SLI? That can't be right surely for the top end chipset can it?