Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review

New Downloads
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24
GeForce 512.77 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1960
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.1 WHQL driver download
3DMark Download v2.22.7359 + Time Spy


New Forum Topics
Gigabyte Project Stealth Hides All Cables Inside Chassis AMD is developing Smart Access Storage to enable speedier game loading. Nvidia shows signs ... Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 WHQL driver download and discussion 5900x or 5800x3D? Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - Deathloop preview AMD Software Preview Driver May 2022 driver download and discussion Are we ever going to get a new NVIDIA CONTROL PANEL ???




Guru3D.com » News » Intel Core i7-4770K clocked to 7068.52MHz

Intel Core i7-4770K clocked to 7068.52MHz

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 08/17/2013 09:33 AM | source: | 30 comment(s)
Intel Core i7-4770K clocked to 7068.52MHz

In a press-release MSI informs us that a new overclocking record has been set with its Z87 XPOWER motherboard. The Overclocking Knights managed to overclock Intel's Core i7-4770K to a wwhopping 7068.52MHz! The new Z87 XPOWER, the top of the line overclocking motherboard recently broke all previous overclocking records for the Intel Core i7-4770K by validating a smashing 7068.52 MHz clock speed. All previous records were set on Engineering samples unavailable to normal users and the Z87 XPOWER record was set on a Retail CPU available in stores right now. This latest score puts MSI firmly at the top of Z87 Overclocking leaderboards.

The new Z87 XPOWER, the top of the line overclocking motherboard recently broke all previous overclocking records for the Intel® Core™ i7-4770K by validating a smashing 7068.52 MHz clock speed. All previous records were set on Engineering samples unavailable to normal users and the Z87 XPOWER record was set on a Retail CPU available in stores right now. This latest score puts MSI firmly at the top of Z87 Overclocking leaderboards.

With the continuation of the design principles of the Z77 MPOWER, which are: Easy Overclocking and Top Stability, MSI Z87 Overclocking series features record holding motherboards such as the Z87 MPOWER, Z87 MPOWER SP, Z87 MPOWER MAX and Z87 XPOWER. In fact 2 out of 3 the fastest Z87 Motherboards on HWBot.org are MSI Z87 OC motherboards. This includes the highest clock-speed for a retail processor. This extreme performance stems from OC Certified testing principle, the use of Military Class 4 components and the integration of the MSI/Intel® Extreme Tuning Utility.



Intel Core i7-4770K clocked to 7068.52MHz Intel Core i7-4770K clocked to 7068.52MHz




« EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 P2 80 PLUS Platinum Rated PSU · Intel Core i7-4770K clocked to 7068.52MHz · LSI demos next-gen SandForce SSD controller technolgies »

Related Stories

Intel Core i7 4771 benchmarks surface, as fast as 4770 - 07/31/2013 02:11 PM
Intel is will launch its Core i7 4771 in the fall to take its premium line to 2014 when it plans to launch a refresh of Haswell. VR-Zone got its hands on a copy of the chip early to run some benchmark...

Eurocom Haswell notebook has GTX 780M SLI, Intel Core i7-4930MX - 06/24/2013 08:38 AM
Eurocom is currently shipping the fastest Haswell based 4th gen Intel Core i7 powered notebook with dual NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M graphics. The EUROCOM Scorpius 2.0 is a ultra high performance, VGA upg...

Intel Core i7 4770K and Z87 chipset review - 06/01/2013 03:54 PM
Intel today finally releases their 4th generation Core processors. Yes we review the Core i7 4770K and Z87 chipset. Not much has been a secret when it comes to this launch, but the embargo is lifted a...

Intel confirms Haswell chipset USB bug - 04/06/2013 07:56 AM
In a Product Change Notification bulletin from Intel confirmed that the current Lynx Point 8-series and C220 chipsets for Haswell have a bug that causes USB 3.0 devices to disappear after entering S3 ...

Intel Core i7 4770K Haswell Processors in Dutch WebShops - 03/19/2013 11:52 AM
Yesterday performance figures of the upcoming Intel Core i7 4770K Haswell Processor leaked onto the web, today the processors has revealed itself in a couple of in Dutch WebShops. Now please underst...


6 pages 1 2 3 4 5 6


CrazY_Milojko
Senior Member



Posts: 2532
Joined: 2013-02-26

#4639042 Posted on: 08/18/2013 04:33 AM
There is no facts in your statement only opinion. and its not shared by most enthusiasts.


Call that whatever you want, opinion, fact, statement... Everybody here can write about that from their point of view and it will be impossible for everyone to agree. I'm OC'ing CPUs and GPUs from the time of first i486 and Voodoo (1) and this half-OC has nothing to impress me. If all cores were active that result would make me jump from the chair.

Whats the difference in a cpuz on all cores or just some?


So why don't you disable 2 cores, drop some 1.5V in that i7-2600K of yours and crank that CPU of yours up to 5.5GHz if there is no difference for you? You already disabled HT so why don't you disable 2 physical cores and go for higher frequency if number of GHz is only that counts?

If that 2-core OC result above is so exciting why don't more OC entusiast leave coment here about that? Probably most of them are dead because of heart attack they had when they had saw that half-core-operative OC'ed CPU. No one will remember that OC result shortly after this article, just a short-live marketing attempt from MSI to get some attention.

Wicked OC! :thumbup: I get what CrazY_Milojko is saying but I'm pretty sure as soon as pro clockers, like these dudes, get their hands on chips that CAN do it with 4 or more cores + HT on they will.It's all for the love of fun after all.


I really hope so this is achievable on i7-4770 but I have reasonable doubt we'll see something like that on i7-4770 and similar especially with HT on. Maybe for few seconds of "stabile testing" under Prime95 and that's it. I would love to see that some entusiast did this at his home made OC laboratory with illegaly obtained L2N, all alone, with just one piece of motherboard and CPU, no matter because just 2 cores are enabled and HT is off. That's what I call an enthusiast and there will be something for respect. But when they have latest state of the art OC technology, dozens of CPUs and motherboards of same type, practically unlimited resources and achieve only this (from my point of view) half-successful OC ("...well, we had to turn off half CPU cores and HT to achieve this frequency...") that's what I called a half-successful marketing attempt and I'm doubt that was much of a fun for people involved in this nothing more than marketing project because MSI had expectations from them and bosses above their heads would not be happy if people doing that OC didn't show them some result. Love and fun were left on the other side of the door. Pure business move from MSI, nothing else.

I'm tired of this article and it's late, enough from me here, I have something smarter to do with my wife. :grin2:

Dragondale13
Senior Member



Posts: 1512
Joined: 2012-10-04

#4639049 Posted on: 08/18/2013 04:57 AM
@ CrazY_Milojko - Ahh!! The marketing game eh! When you put it that way it's hard to disagree.

Koniakki
Senior Member



Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15

#4639072 Posted on: 08/18/2013 08:13 AM
What's the point of laughing at people testing the limits? It's in human nature, even if it doesn't produce tangible benefits. This isn't much different from building a 2000 horsepower car for drag racing. You do it because you can, and because it's fun.


+1 My thoughts are inline with the above post from IcE and I want to add that there are many other less "entertaining" records out there with much less significance than finding a golden/great chip and testing it to the limit.

E.g: The tallest mohican measures 113.5 cm (44.68 in) and belongs to Kazuhiro Watanabe (Japan).



So please... I would love to watch a PRO Overclocker testing/finding the limits of a CPU than watching that guy fixing his mohican.
*no offense meant to Mr. Kazuhiro Watanabe


---TK---
Senior Member



Posts: 22110
Joined: 2005-12-10

#4639151 Posted on: 08/18/2013 02:44 PM
Call that whatever you want, opinion, fact, statement... Everybody here can write about that from their point of view and it will be impossible for everyone to agree. I'm OC'ing CPUs and GPUs from the time of first i486 and Voodoo (1) and this half-OC has nothing to impress me. If all cores were active that result would make me jump from the chair.



So why don't you disable 2 cores, drop some 1.5V in that i7-2600K of yours and crank that CPU of yours up to 5.5GHz if there is no difference for you? You already disabled HT so why don't you disable 2 physical cores and go for higher frequency if number of GHz is only that counts?

If that 2-core OC result above is so exciting why don't more OC entusiast leave coment here about that? Probably most of them are dead because of heart attack they had when they had saw that half-core-operative OC'ed CPU. No one will remember that OC result shortly after this article, just a short-live marketing attempt from MSI to get some attention.



I really hope so this is achievable on i7-4770 but I have reasonable doubt we'll see something like that on i7-4770 and similar especially with HT on. Maybe for few seconds of "stabile testing" under Prime95 and that's it. I would love to see that some entusiast did this at his home made OC laboratory with illegaly obtained L2N, all alone, with just one piece of motherboard and CPU, no matter because just 2 cores are enabled and HT is off. That's what I call an enthusiast and there will be something for respect. But when they have latest state of the art OC technology, dozens of CPUs and motherboards of same type, practically unlimited resources and achieve only this (from my point of view) half-successful OC ("...well, we had to turn off half CPU cores and HT to achieve this frequency...") that's what I called a half-successful marketing attempt and I'm doubt that was much of a fun for people involved in this nothing more than marketing project because MSI had expectations from them and bosses above their heads would not be happy if people doing that OC didn't show them some result. Love and fun were left on the other side of the door. Pure business move from MSI, nothing else.

I'm tired of this article and it's late, enough from me here, I have something smarter to do with my wife. :grin2:
missed 98% of your post here, unreadable.

yasamoka
Senior Member



Posts: 4862
Joined: 2009-08-29

#4639155 Posted on: 08/18/2013 02:50 PM
missed 98% of your post here, unreadable.

TK, ease up dude, let it go.

Everybody has stated his opinion on that OC already.

6 pages 1 2 3 4 5 6


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022