Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
WD Red SN500 NVMe SSD review
Core i9 12900K processor review
Core i5 12600K processor review
Intel Core i7-11700 Rocket Lake Gets Benchmarked
On YouTube a new video emerged of an i7-11700 Rocket Lake processor, being bitter against the predominantly the 5800X. The i7-11700 appears to be slightly faster than the 5800X in both the single- and multi-threaded tests of the CPU-Z Bench.
It also shows it's faster than Ryzen 7 5800X in Cinebench R15 and R20. However, this has to be stated, I just compared this results set of the 5800X with our own benchmarks, and theirs seem to be lower, at least in the single-threaded numbers they're way off. In the video 5800X keeps the lead with 7-Zip but Blender then would favor the i7-11700. In V-Ray and Handbrake Ryzen is then faster again.
It has also been compared how Cypress Cove's larger cache should affect memory performance. The L2 cache has grown less, but in Aida64 the L2 cache is about 50% faster in read and copy tasks. The L3 cache is slightly slower with a performance drop of up to 20%. We have a bit of an issue with the Ryzen values as the numbers don't add up in all tests, and we don't know what the PL plans on this motherboard has been for the Core i7-11700. The i7-11700 offers an 8 core / 16 thread configuration under the Cypress Cove architecture at a 14nm+++ process, clocked at 2.90 / 4.40 GHz, and a 65W TDP. You can check the Odd Tech Reviews presentation here.
Intel Core i9-11900K processor breaks 1900 point barrier - Updated: Photos of Packaging - 02/19/2021 01:21 PM
There are so many 'leaks' these days on Rocket Lake-S that it makes one wonder. This time around, the Core i9-11900K appeared on Geekbench, where it managed to break a record....
Intel Core i9-11900K ES and Core i7-11700 ES prices leaked in china - 12/28/2020 10:38 AM
Over at Chiphell prices of ES based Core i9-11900K ES and Core i7-11700 have popped up. Take them with a grain of salt of course, but considering the leaker also has been posting CPU-Z screenshots of ...
Intel Core i9-11900 and i9-11900K (ES) CPU-Z Benchmarks Surface and shows 12% Gain - 12/21/2020 10:35 AM
Two new Rocket Lake for desktop screenshots have been spotted, the eight-core Core i9-11900 and i9-11900K. Judging from the results returned, they show a gain of 12%....
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Beats Intel Core i5-10600K - 10/20/2020 08:53 AM
And before I continue the news item, that Core i5-10600Khas a 125W TDP, the AMD one ...65 Watts. Anyhow, meet the Ryzen 5 5600X CPU. TUM_APISAK stumbled into some entries at the SiSoftware Sandra ...
Intel Could Fight off AMD Ryzen 5000 just based on lower prices - 10/13/2020 08:55 AM
You all will have noticed that AMD's Ryzen 5000 is seeing a pretty significant price premium, all processors have gotten an uplift of 50 USD per proc seen over the current generation. And that opens ...
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 1344
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1344
Joined: 2014-07-22
#5890054 Posted on: 02/23/2021 11:40 PM
At the end of the day Intel is still peddling an old architecture rewarmed, riddled with security holes, that is still monolithic in design and still manufactured at 14nm, with all of the negatives 14nm brings contrasted with 7nm. Win10 will still require lots of microcode patching specifically for these Intel CPUs. Increasingly, we will see Intel relying on spotty and questionable benchmarks, in addition to Intel becoming the value CPU supplier by lowering prices--which is fine and I see nothing wrong with Intel continuing in the runner-up category. It's notable at this date that instead of Intel making these CPUs available for purchase we are seeing more canned and conditional benchmarks in place of silicon in any volume. When AMD punches out Zen 4 I hate to think of what kind of "productivity" and otherwise benchmarks we will see from Intel! Heck, add on a couple AGESA's for Zen 3 and it's all uphill for Intel, anyway, prior to Zen 4. I wonder when we will actually see a new architecture from Intel? In two years, maybe? AMD has had 3 architectures released over just the last 3-4 years--Zen 1/+, Zen2, Zen3. Zen1 at 14nm, + at 12nm, Zen 3/4 at 7nm. Remarkable record of solid achievement.
At the end of the day Intel is still peddling an old architecture rewarmed, riddled with security holes, that is still monolithic in design and still manufactured at 14nm, with all of the negatives 14nm brings contrasted with 7nm. Win10 will still require lots of microcode patching specifically for these Intel CPUs. Increasingly, we will see Intel relying on spotty and questionable benchmarks, in addition to Intel becoming the value CPU supplier by lowering prices--which is fine and I see nothing wrong with Intel continuing in the runner-up category. It's notable at this date that instead of Intel making these CPUs available for purchase we are seeing more canned and conditional benchmarks in place of silicon in any volume. When AMD punches out Zen 4 I hate to think of what kind of "productivity" and otherwise benchmarks we will see from Intel! Heck, add on a couple AGESA's for Zen 3 and it's all uphill for Intel, anyway, prior to Zen 4. I wonder when we will actually see a new architecture from Intel? In two years, maybe? AMD has had 3 architectures released over just the last 3-4 years--Zen 1/+, Zen2, Zen3. Zen1 at 14nm, + at 12nm, Zen 3/4 at 7nm. Remarkable record of solid achievement.
Venix
Senior Member
Posts: 1957
Joined: 2016-08-01
Senior Member
Posts: 1957
Joined: 2016-08-01
#5890055 Posted on: 02/23/2021 11:41 PM
I hope it does beat the ryzen , we need a competitive intel and amd so both can not run off with the prices .atm amd is running laughing all the way to the bank :p
I hope it does beat the ryzen , we need a competitive intel and amd so both can not run off with the prices .atm amd is running laughing all the way to the bank :p
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 10660
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 10660
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5890083 Posted on: 02/24/2021 01:13 AM
Heat and power draw will be the achilles heal of RL. 14nm has been around for a long time and even the chips from 4 years ago (7700k) were hot.
Heat and power draw will be the achilles heal of RL. 14nm has been around for a long time and even the chips from 4 years ago (7700k) were hot.
squalles
Senior Member
Posts: 870
Joined: 2003-06-10
Senior Member
Posts: 870
Joined: 2003-06-10
#5890728 Posted on: 02/25/2021 11:20 PM
yes but this is prolly all stock on stock memory speeds
otherwise it's pointless comparing
just like a dozen of people always commenting "but mine gets more"
no wonder,with pbo,memory,fclk tweaking results should improve vastly
i´m saying about mine 5900x on stock with memory 3200mhz cl14 stock too, i can´t get higher pontuation on cpu-z even when i overclock my memory to 3800mhz cl16, its exactly same pontuation, but using pbo i´m getting 685 points
yes but this is prolly all stock on stock memory speeds
otherwise it's pointless comparing
just like a dozen of people always commenting "but mine gets more"
no wonder,with pbo,memory,fclk tweaking results should improve vastly
i´m saying about mine 5900x on stock with memory 3200mhz cl14 stock too, i can´t get higher pontuation on cpu-z even when i overclock my memory to 3800mhz cl16, its exactly same pontuation, but using pbo i´m getting 685 points
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3397
Joined: 2008-10-13
Nothing intel brings out interest me.
Too many things or needed to do what 95% of what ryzen does out of the box. Yawn.