Kingston KC3000 PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
EnGenius ECS2512FP. 8-port 2.5G Cloud Switch review
Deepcool CG560 chassis review
Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
Intel Core i7-11700 Rocket Lake Gets Benchmarked
On YouTube a new video emerged of an i7-11700 Rocket Lake processor, being bitter against the predominantly the 5800X. The i7-11700 appears to be slightly faster than the 5800X in both the single- and multi-threaded tests of the CPU-Z Bench.
It also shows it's faster than Ryzen 7 5800X in Cinebench R15 and R20. However, this has to be stated, I just compared this results set of the 5800X with our own benchmarks, and theirs seem to be lower, at least in the single-threaded numbers they're way off. In the video 5800X keeps the lead with 7-Zip but Blender then would favor the i7-11700. In V-Ray and Handbrake Ryzen is then faster again.
It has also been compared how Cypress Cove's larger cache should affect memory performance. The L2 cache has grown less, but in Aida64 the L2 cache is about 50% faster in read and copy tasks. The L3 cache is slightly slower with a performance drop of up to 20%. We have a bit of an issue with the Ryzen values as the numbers don't add up in all tests, and we don't know what the PL plans on this motherboard has been for the Core i7-11700. The i7-11700 offers an 8 core / 16 thread configuration under the Cypress Cove architecture at a 14nm+++ process, clocked at 2.90 / 4.40 GHz, and a 65W TDP. You can check the Odd Tech Reviews presentation here.
Intel Core i9-11900K processor breaks 1900 point barrier - Updated: Photos of Packaging - 02/19/2021 01:21 PM
There are so many 'leaks' these days on Rocket Lake-S that it makes one wonder. This time around, the Core i9-11900K appeared on Geekbench, where it managed to break a record....
Intel Core i9-11900K ES and Core i7-11700 ES prices leaked in china - 12/28/2020 10:38 AM
Over at Chiphell prices of ES based Core i9-11900K ES and Core i7-11700 have popped up. Take them with a grain of salt of course, but considering the leaker also has been posting CPU-Z screenshots of ...
Intel Core i9-11900 and i9-11900K (ES) CPU-Z Benchmarks Surface and shows 12% Gain - 12/21/2020 10:35 AM
Two new Rocket Lake for desktop screenshots have been spotted, the eight-core Core i9-11900 and i9-11900K. Judging from the results returned, they show a gain of 12%....
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Beats Intel Core i5-10600K - 10/20/2020 08:53 AM
And before I continue the news item, that Core i5-10600Khas a 125W TDP, the AMD one ...65 Watts. Anyhow, meet the Ryzen 5 5600X CPU. TUM_APISAK stumbled into some entries at the SiSoftware Sandra ...
Intel Could Fight off AMD Ryzen 5000 just based on lower prices - 10/13/2020 08:55 AM
You all will have noticed that AMD's Ryzen 5000 is seeing a pretty significant price premium, all processors have gotten an uplift of 50 USD per proc seen over the current generation. And that opens ...
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 485
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 485
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5889930 Posted on: 02/23/2021 02:58 PM
Dat Dirt 5 graph, LOL.
I am super pumped for 11500 and 11400,they are showing massive single core uplifts,around 35%
https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i5-11400-rocket-lake-s-cpu-is-34-faster-than-predecessor-in-single-core-benchmark
if they launch at 200-250eur then 5600x is dead in the water unless it drops down 100eur back to acceptable 6 core price.
if they fail im grabbin a 10700f, 250eur here and dropping.
Yeah, for sure. Yet the 10600K is still behind the 5600X in that Geekbench result in single core and far away in multi core.
AMD is able to reduce 5000 series prices IF needed. And they will do it if needed as they milked customers enough since the launch of the 5000 series. Not to speak of releasing the non-X models.
It's funny to see that Intel being slower in single core made Intel fans crave for being cheaper than AMD but when Intel was just a bit faster in single core (ComL vs Zen2, CofL against Zen+) like 5000 series is so now, Intel fans said that it is the fastest gaming CPU so it's worth the price premium. Sorry to say, but I'm LMAO about similar comments.
Dat Dirt 5 graph, LOL.
I am super pumped for 11500 and 11400,they are showing massive single core uplifts,around 35%
https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i5-11400-rocket-lake-s-cpu-is-34-faster-than-predecessor-in-single-core-benchmark
if they launch at 200-250eur then 5600x is dead in the water unless it drops down 100eur back to acceptable 6 core price.
if they fail im grabbin a 10700f, 250eur here and dropping.
Yeah, for sure. Yet the 10600K is still behind the 5600X in that Geekbench result in single core and far away in multi core.
AMD is able to reduce 5000 series prices IF needed. And they will do it if needed as they milked customers enough since the launch of the 5000 series. Not to speak of releasing the non-X models.
It's funny to see that Intel being slower in single core made Intel fans crave for being cheaper than AMD but when Intel was just a bit faster in single core (ComL vs Zen2, CofL against Zen+) like 5000 series is so now, Intel fans said that it is the fastest gaming CPU so it's worth the price premium. Sorry to say, but I'm LMAO about similar comments.
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 3055
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 3055
Joined: 2020-08-03
#5889934 Posted on: 02/23/2021 03:06 PM
yes but this is prolly all stock on stock memory speeds
otherwise it's pointless comparing
just like a dozen of people always commenting "but mine gets more"
no wonder,with pbo,memory,fclk tweaking results should improve vastly
5800x only doing 625 points on cpu-z single core? looks weird, mine 5900x does 677 points in stock
yes but this is prolly all stock on stock memory speeds
otherwise it's pointless comparing
just like a dozen of people always commenting "but mine gets more"
no wonder,with pbo,memory,fclk tweaking results should improve vastly
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 8116
Joined: 2010-11-16
Senior Member
Posts: 8116
Joined: 2010-11-16
#5889947 Posted on: 02/23/2021 04:07 PM
Intel's bottom feeder ties single-core performance with the AMD's 450 euro crown jewel
AMD did a great job with 5000, but Intel is a beast. Can't wait to see what they do with 3nm.
Intel's bottom feeder ties single-core performance with the AMD's 450 euro crown jewel
AMD did a great job with 5000, but Intel is a beast. Can't wait to see what they do with 3nm.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 16853
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 16853
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5889948 Posted on: 02/23/2021 04:19 PM
Intel's bottom feeder ties single-core performance with the AMD's 450 euro crown jewel
AMD did a great job with 5000, but Intel is a beast. Can't wait to see what they do with 3nm.
All i see is intels best compared to ryzen 7 becouse ryzen 9 smacks down and it would be unfair comparison. These are anything but beasts more like crawling back from the pit trying to stay relevant. Amd 5000 are still cpus to get this year.
Intel's bottom feeder ties single-core performance with the AMD's 450 euro crown jewel
AMD did a great job with 5000, but Intel is a beast. Can't wait to see what they do with 3nm.
All i see is intels best compared to ryzen 7 becouse ryzen 9 smacks down and it would be unfair comparison. These are anything but beasts more like crawling back from the pit trying to stay relevant. Amd 5000 are still cpus to get this year.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 16853
Joined: 2008-08-28
With a little tweaking 5800X also does 660pts.