Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Intel Core i7-10700K Spotted in UL 3DMark listing at 5.30 GHz Turbo Boost
It seems the specs of Intel's upcoming processors might change a bit. A 3DMark benchmark was spotted, indicating a slightly higher Turbo clock at 5300 MHz.
TUM_APISAK spotted a Futuremark SystemInfo screenshot of the Core i7-10700K which shows 3.80 GHz base, with a 5.30 GHz Turbo Boost. That is interesting as earlier on it was listed at 5.1 GHz. perhaps the 'Thermal Velocity Boost' kicked in, who knows. The Core i7-10700K has 8 cores, HyperThreading at 16 threads. Earlier on the Core i9-10900K also got mentioned with its ten cores.
It could also be a tweak of course, but the fact that the proc is listed is interesting all by itself, also it was tested at an ECS motherboard, the Z490H6-A2 apparently.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Cores/threads | Baseklok | Turbo 1T | Max Turbo 3.0 | All-core turbo | TDP |
| i9 10900K | 10C/20T | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz* | 4.8 GHz | 125W |
| i9 10900 | 10C/20T | 2.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz* | 4.5 GHz | 65W |
| i7 10700K | 8C/16T | 3.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.3?? GHz | 4.7 GHz | 125W |
| i7 10700 | 8C/16T | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10600K | 6C/12T | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz | - | 4.5 GHz | 125W |
| i5 10600 | 6C/12T | 3.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz | - | 4.4 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10500 | 6C/12T | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | - | 4.2 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10400 | 6C/12T | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz | - | 4.0 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10320 | 4C/8T | 3.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | - | 4.4 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10300 | 4C/8T | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz | - | 4.2 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10100 | 4C/8T | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz | - | 4.1 GHz | 65W |
| * Intel Thermal Velocity Boost (single-core / all core): 10900K: 5.3/4.9 GHz; 10900: 5.1/4.6 GHz | ||||||
Intel Core i9 10900K with 5.1 GHz boost appears in 3DMark specifications - 02/02/2020 10:53 PM
We've seen many signs that Intel is getting closer to release the desktop 10000 series of Core processors. Z490 motherboards for the new generation procs keep popping up, plus weeks ago the entire li...
Intel Core i5-L16G7 Lakefield Spotted in benchmark - 01/31/2020 05:26 PM
Does anyone remember Lakefield? You know, not regular desktop processors, but more of a hybrid one based on Foveros technology? Well, as it seems the Intel Core i5-L16G7 has surfaced in a benchmark.
Intel Comet Lake-S CPUs and Z490 boards support PCI-E 4.0 (but it's not active) - 01/22/2020 01:21 PM
A new report on the web indicates that the upcoming Comet Lake-S processors (tenth generation of Intel Core for desktop) actually do support PCI Express 4.0, some Z490 motherboards are designed for it...
Intel Comet Lake i5 and i3 spotted, both get HyperThreading but lower clock speeds - 12/28/2019 10:11 AM
Some info on Intels' pending Comet Lake processors has surfaced. The 14nm node fabricated processors are assumed to launch in April. Earlier on it was kind of confirmed that the lower positioned pro...
Intel Core i9-10900K 10-core Processor and Z490 Chipset Rumored to be released April 2020 - 12/10/2019 09:36 AM
Intel Generation 10 Comet Lake processors, based on Intel's 14nm process and an underlying microarchitecture that is Skylake is next year's desktop processor series from Intel. It makes a step towar...
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 14623
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 14623
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5759570 Posted on: 02/12/2020 05:29 PM
^ Yeah... until we know what cooling it had, I wouldn't trust that benchmark to not be made with LN2 or a chiller... it's not like we haven't had that already.
^ Yeah... until we know what cooling it had, I wouldn't trust that benchmark to not be made with LN2 or a chiller... it's not like we haven't had that already.
EspHack
Senior Member
Posts: 2770
Joined: 2010-01-03
Senior Member
Posts: 2770
Joined: 2010-01-03
#5759585 Posted on: 02/12/2020 06:41 PM
maybe they realized they might need it
maybe they realized they might need it
Glottiz
Senior Member
Posts: 1147
Joined: 2006-11-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1147
Joined: 2006-11-18
#5759604 Posted on: 02/12/2020 07:48 PM
When AMD release a product with higher TDP than competition: "It's not really an issue, it costs just a few extra Euros pear year to run it, difference is negligible. I still love AMD and support them!"
When Intel release a product with higher TDP than competition: "OMG Intel is the devil incarnate! They killed my whole family!"
TDP 0 (Meltdown ERROR... ERROR... Kaboom) 
When AMD release a product with higher TDP than competition: "It's not really an issue, it costs just a few extra Euros pear year to run it, difference is negligible. I still love AMD and support them!"
When Intel release a product with higher TDP than competition: "OMG Intel is the devil incarnate! They killed my whole family!"
metagamer
Senior Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: 2018-04-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: 2018-04-10
#5759608 Posted on: 02/12/2020 07:56 PM
Why? Intels have boosted to 5ghz right out of the box for a while now. 5.3ghz is not a miraculous increase. On LN2 they've hit well over 7ghz.
^ Yeah... until we know what cooling it had, I wouldn't trust that benchmark to not be made with LN2 or a chiller... it's not like we haven't had that already.
Why? Intels have boosted to 5ghz right out of the box for a while now. 5.3ghz is not a miraculous increase. On LN2 they've hit well over 7ghz.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 2017-12-19
TDP 0 (Meltdown ERROR... ERROR... Kaboom)