Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review

New Downloads
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0


New Forum Topics
RTSS 6.7.0 beta 1 NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2021 GeForce 461.72 WHQL drivers: download & discussion AMD announces Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB at 479 USD, launches on March 18th MSI has released Motherboard BIOS's for AGESA 1.2.0.0 Intel Re-Confirms March 30 for Rocket Lake-S Launch AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.2.3 [Mod Driver] NimeZ Radeon Software - Signature Edition GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download Review: MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO




Guru3D.com » News » Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400

Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/12/2020 02:51 PM | source: videocardz.com | 24 comment(s)
Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400

Processors like these could be good gaming CPUs, and yes once again in Asia on the ChipHell forums a leak occurred. This round the Core i5-10400 processor (6c/12t) listed for USD $184indicates it could be a sweet spot mid-range product.

Its predecessors are the Core i5-9400F and the i5-8400.  Core i5-10400 comes with 6-cores/12-threads and has 12 MB of shared L3 cache with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a turbo to 4.30 GHz.

Tested on an MSI MAG Z490 Tomahawk the results have been compared with an i5-9400F with Cinebench R15 and R20, CPU-Z and SuperPi. The processor posts is merely 2-5% faster in a single-threaded test. With multi-threaded tests, the i5-10400 starts to shine thanks to HyperThreading and is yielding a ~40% performance increase in CPU-Z bench multi-threaded; with similar results in Cinebench R20. The results show that the processor is in close reach of the Ryzen 5 3600X in multi-threaded Cinebench tests.

 



Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400




« Sid Meiers Civilization VI - New Frontier Pass Set to Deliver Bimonthly New Content Beginning May 21, 2020 · Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 · Video: NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang is baking something in that oven, Ampere? »

Related Stories

Intel Core i9-10900K at defaults stressed, Power Consumption Reads 235W, Temperatures hits 93°C - 05/12/2020 07:21 AM
In the land far East (Asia) some leaks have been occurring, a new one is interesting as it shows a stock clocked Intel Core i9-10900K 10-core processor running an AIDA FPU stress test. And it shows th...

ASRock Z490 Server Motherboard Ready for 10th Gen Intel Core Processors - 05/11/2020 07:44 AM
ASRock Rack, - Cloud-computing server leading manufacturer ASRock Rack announced its new micro-ATX server motherboard solution; the Z490D4U-2L2T supports the latest 10th Gen Intel Core processors and ...

MSI tries some Intel Comet Lake-S processors binning and tweaking - 05/07/2020 08:09 AM
In one of their regular live streams MSI Netherlands talks about binning Comet Lake-S processors and ties some conclusions to that. I say this with a bit of skepticism as MSI has been provided the pro...

Intel Core i9-10900K spotted overclocked at 5.4 GHz, incl Cinebench CB15 benchmark score - 05/06/2020 04:23 PM
As review kits are shipped and a lot of testing is going on, more and more preliminary leaks and info will come out. This round a Core i9-10900K is spotted being overclocked to a whopping 5.4 GHz, it...

Intel Comet Lake-S Review Kit Gets Unboxed, shows Core i9-10900K and Core i5-10600K - 05/06/2020 09:42 AM
The Comet Lake-S reviews aha 10th generation Core processors for desktop is getting closer. The announcements have been made and reviews will follow at some point in the next few weeks. In Asia some m...


5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


toyo
Senior Member



Posts: 379
Joined: 2008-10-15

#5787885 Posted on: 05/12/2020 07:44 PM
Not bad, basically a slowed down 8700K. If it was unlocked you'd likely get it to 5GHz.

Undying
Senior Member



Posts: 14884
Joined: 2008-08-28

#5787889 Posted on: 05/12/2020 07:55 PM
Not bad, basically a slowed down 8700K. If it was unlocked you'd likely get it to 5GHz.


When you think about 8700k isnt that fast anymore. I dont think this is worth 280$ and need a new board. Again what amd offers with 3600 is a better choise.

metagamer
Senior Member



Posts: 1866
Joined: 2018-04-10

#5787896 Posted on: 05/12/2020 08:17 PM
When you think about 8700k isnt that fast anymore. I dont think this is worth 280$ and need a new board. Again what amd offers with 3600 is a better choise.

The 10400 is going to be $280?

oxidized
Senior Member



Posts: 234
Joined: 2017-08-22

#5787903 Posted on: 05/12/2020 08:41 PM
When you think about 8700k isnt that fast anymore. I dont think this is worth 280$ and need a new board. Again what amd offers with 3600 is a better choise.


Same thing AMD is asking for their new CPUs, and he might need to buy a new motherboard anyway. Besides this'll probably be better in everything compared to a 3600x, will probably draw more power and have higher temps tho. A 4600x could be better but again, anyone or almost, would need a new motherboard regardless. Also how do you know this is going to cost that much, xx400 class i5 should be the mid low i5s...

coth
Senior Member



Posts: 483
Joined: 2005-02-23

#5787905 Posted on: 05/12/2020 08:43 PM
If you have 8700K you still have to buy a new board to get AMD CPU.

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021