MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Guru3D.com »
News »
Intel Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 Cinebench Scores Spotted, compared with Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100
Intel Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 Cinebench Scores Spotted, compared with Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100
Yeah, that's four CB20 benchmark scores from four unleased processors. Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 are of course Comet lake, socket LGA1200 processors with 4-cores/8-threads, and SMT hyper-threading).
The i3-10100 is an entry-level part that clocks in at 3.60 GHz and gets a 4.30 GHz boost; the i3-10300 is clocked at 3.70 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. Both at a 65 W TDP. L3 cache is different for each. the i3-10100 has 6 MB, the i3-10300 has 8 MB. Cinebench R20 scores of the two chips got leaked to the web through CPU-Monkey and then posted at 3DCenter. Check out the results table comparing top last weeks announced (but unreleased Ryzen 3000 Series 3 3100 and 3300X.
That difference is tight/marginal at best alright.
technology | CB20 ST | CB20 MT | source | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen 3 3300X | AMD Zen 2, 4C / 8T, 3.8 / 4.3 GHz, 65W | 491 | 2341 | CPU monkey |
Ryzen 3 3100 | AMD Zen 2, 4C / 8T, 3.6 / 3.9 GHz, 65W | 444 | 2154 | CPU monkey |
Ryzen 5 1500X | AMD Zen 1, 4C / 8T, 3.5 / 3.7 GHz, 65W | 341 | 1811 | CPU monkey |
Core i3-10300 | Intel Comet Lake, 4C / 8T, 3.7 / 4.4 GHz, 65W | 457 | 2330 | CPU monkey |
Core i3-10100 | Intel Comet Lake, 4C / 8T, 3.6 / 4.3 GHz, 65W | 448 | 2284 | CPU monkey |
Core i7-7700K | Intel Kaby Lake, 4C / 8T, 4.2 / 4.5 GHz, 95W | 466 | 2257 | CPU monkey |
« Gigabyte outs AORUS K1 Mechanical Gaming Keyboard · Intel Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 Cinebench Scores Spotted, compared with Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100
· Samsung T7 external SSD without fingerprint scanner spotted »
Intel Core i7-10700K and i5-10600K Benchmarks in Geekbench - 04/20/2020 03:33 PM
You have to wonder if there's anything let to report after Intel actually launches their Comet lake series desktop processors. Today you can add numbers for Core i7-10700K and i5-10600K, which seem ...
Steam Shows Intel Core CPUs Gaining ground on the processor install base over AMD Ryzen - 04/07/2020 08:43 AM
It has been an incredible dynamic few years on the processor front. AMD recaptured processor momentum ever since they released Ryzen processors. I mean just where they are now and where they were four...
10th Gen Intel Comet Lake-H for notebooks specs leak onto the web - 03/31/2020 08:35 AM
Intel will launch its new Intel Comet Lake-H processors for laptops, and a leak occurred on the web, showing all final specifications from twhat seem to be official Intel slides....
Intel Comet Lake successor Rocket Lake to get PCIe Gen 4.0 Support - 03/22/2020 03:04 PM
So the story goes like this, Comet Lake, the pending to be released Intel desktop processors up-top 10 cores, originally had a PCIe Gen4 design, but with signal validation issues, Intel is sticking to...
Intel Comet Lake-S Desktop process pricing starts to leak - 03/10/2020 12:55 PM
Comet lake is the next-gen processor series froM intel for desktop. We've discussed these many times and as it seems, not a day goes by with some sort of leak. Well, today another one, a Dutch etaile...
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11527
Joined: 2012-07-20
I have Ryzen 3600 and Ryzen 3900x, and these cpu's is slower than 7700k with 4000mhz memory in most games,
except some games that uses 12 threads. 3300x is not faster than 3900x, that is for shure
PS: "No one" is using 7700k @ stock and 2133mhz memory.
Will read again just for laughs. That 4000MHz memory price at time of purchase of 7700K must have been great.
And know quite a few people who did pair intel-"K" CPU with lower than top chipset which means, they could not OC their "unlocked" chip. Not everyone had money to pay extra for MB and definitely not for memories in those years.
(That much for "No one".)
Side note: Most of the people get pre-built systems which happen to have slower memories and boards that do not support OC. And those shops will put "K" CPUs on them.