Corsair M55 RGB PRO gaming mouse review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Lexar NM600 NVMe M.2. SSD (480GB) review
Tech preview: Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT
Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - 7nm ZEN2
Patriot Viper VPN100 M2 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe M.2. SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - May 2019
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
DeepCool Matrexx 70 Chassis review
Intel cancels WiGig cards and 802.11ad docking parts
Intel is halting production for 60 GHz 802.11ad WIFI on their laptop and thus other add-in modules. The AD WIFI connection uses the 60hz band, and in a direct line of sight you can reach 7 Gbit/s on short distances through docking two devices.
As it seems, the market has very little interest in the new AD spec, few docking stations have been sold. Only a few 802.11ad docking stations have been released. And it likely all has to do with the adoption rate of Intel's Thunderbolt 3 release with USB Type-C allowing you to dock laptops over a wire (at speeds up to 40 Gbit/s).
Manufacturers can place orders for AD compatible add-in cards up-to September 29th, after which deliveries will take place until the end of the year, but after that, AD WIFI is no longer a thing for Intel laptops. Intel might continue to support the 802.11ad spec for other applications though, like wireless-control of VR headsets.
Intel Cancels Intel Developer Forum - 04/18/2017 08:08 AM
And that's now and in the future. We are a bit puzzled as to what is going on with Intel these days, last year here in the Netherlands and well, many other spots in the EU, they cancelled all press-a...
Intel Cannon Lake Mobile Processors This Year? - 04/05/2017 08:59 PM
While it's not exactly a surprize as we mentioned this a couple of times already Intel last week confirmed it on their technology and manufacturing day, their new 14nm ++ process. Intel also announce...
Next Gen Intel Cannon Lake 15% faster and again a 14nm processor - 02/10/2017 06:37 PM
Intel held an investor day briefing yesterday in which it made some claims on the next generation desktop processors. The CPUs next in line will be based on Cannon Lake, interesting to see it that it...
Intel cancels Kaby Lake-H - Kaby Lake Refresh will be Core ix 8000 series - 12/28/2016 11:01 AM
A new road-map from Intel surfaced on the web with the Kaby lake refresh processors, these were called Kaby Lake-H. The new Kaby Lake Refresh models however will be called the Core ix 8000 series and...
Intel cancels Larrabee 1st consumer graphics chip - 12/05/2009 11:59 AM
A massive developing story today as Larrabee in pure GPU has been canceled. The world
SweenJM
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2017-09-10
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2017-09-10
#5470878 Posted on: 09/10/2017 08:12 PM
As I understand it, interference nor range is not the problem so much as a lack of penetration through obstacles. 60ghz (and even 5ghz) has wonderful line of sight range, but can barely go through a wall. The latency on my AirFiber bridges is nearly as good as hardwire, and they are well over a kilometer away from each other. 60ghz has an even harder time going through things than 5ghz does, and this whole beamforming thing where they bounce the signal off and around obstacles is proving to be quite difficult to make work in practice. I believe it is also one of the big reasons holding up the mass roullout of 5G celluar networks.
As I understand it, interference nor range is not the problem so much as a lack of penetration through obstacles. 60ghz (and even 5ghz) has wonderful line of sight range, but can barely go through a wall. The latency on my AirFiber bridges is nearly as good as hardwire, and they are well over a kilometer away from each other. 60ghz has an even harder time going through things than 5ghz does, and this whole beamforming thing where they bounce the signal off and around obstacles is proving to be quite difficult to make work in practice. I believe it is also one of the big reasons holding up the mass roullout of 5G celluar networks.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3992
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 3992
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5470881 Posted on: 09/10/2017 08:23 PM
You're right - penetration is mostly the problem. But from what I recall, current ad technology doesn't have that great of range. None of that really matters in a VR environment, though. You're still probably going to want to use the headset in the same room as the receiver, so it ought to work just fine. Wearers of the headset could have a sort of halo above their head that acts as the antenna, so it doesn't matter what direction they face in. VR headsets already require line-of-sight to things like the base stations, so the wireless transmitter could be combined on one of them. To me, all of this seems like a no-brainer.
As I understand it, interference nor range is not the problem so much as a lack of penetration through obstacles. 60ghz (and even 5ghz) has wonderful line of sight range, but can barely go through a wall. The latency on my AirFiber bridges is nearly as good as hardwire, and they are well over a kilometer away from each other. 60ghz has an even harder time going through things than 5ghz does, and this whole beamforming thing where they bounce the signal off and around obstacles is proving to be quite difficult to make work in practice. I believe it is also one of the big reasons holding up the mass roullout of 5G celluar networks.
You're right - penetration is mostly the problem. But from what I recall, current ad technology doesn't have that great of range. None of that really matters in a VR environment, though. You're still probably going to want to use the headset in the same room as the receiver, so it ought to work just fine. Wearers of the headset could have a sort of halo above their head that acts as the antenna, so it doesn't matter what direction they face in. VR headsets already require line-of-sight to things like the base stations, so the wireless transmitter could be combined on one of them. To me, all of this seems like a no-brainer.
SweenJM
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2017-09-10
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2017-09-10
#5470883 Posted on: 09/10/2017 08:30 PM
I agree. VR headsets, wireless scanners, wireless displays.......all great applications for 60ghz.
I agree. VR headsets, wireless scanners, wireless displays.......all great applications for 60ghz.
MasterBash
Senior Member
Posts: 813
Joined: 2003-07-11
Senior Member
Posts: 813
Joined: 2003-07-11
#5470918 Posted on: 09/11/2017 01:22 AM
I wish there would be such a thing as wireless displayport that supports1080p @ 144hz or even 240hz :p I would definitely run my second monitor wirelessly.
I wish there would be such a thing as wireless displayport that supports1080p @ 144hz or even 240hz :p I would definitely run my second monitor wirelessly.
Mufflore
Senior Member
Posts: 11089
Joined: 2010-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 11089
Joined: 2010-05-22
#5471200 Posted on: 09/11/2017 11:09 PM
Ah that will be the new Ultra Low B/W spec for dieters.
The AD WIFI connection uses the 60hz band...
Ah that will be the new Ultra Low B/W spec for dieters.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3992
Joined: 2012-11-10
I personally feel ad will never and should never take off, as a generic WiFi standard. I feel it makes for the perfect opportunity to make vr headsets wireless. Currently, widi is oberall a failure, because there is too much interference (which worsens latency), and if you're sharing a network then you lose a lot of bandwidth. If ad were used for widi, it could work for ad-hoc connections with little interference. The range issue would mostly be irrelevant, since you'd probably be in the same room anyway.