Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
Intel Arc A380 Performs Pretty Bad with AMD CPUs
A recent set of benchmarks found on bilibili, Intel's Arc A380 cards perform more rancid with an AMD Ryzen 5 5600 than with an Core i5-12400 CPU. The card was tested on an ASUS TUF B550M motherboard with 16 GB of DDR4 3600 MHz RAM.
Both test platforms enable auto-resizable BARs and 4G decoding. Both machines were running Windows 11 21H2. With the exception of League of Legends, AMD trailed Intel by 1% to 15% in every of the 10 gamer. Forza Horizon 5 and Total War: Three Kingdoms trailed by 14 to 15%. League of Legends, Dota 2, Rainbow 6 Extraction, Watch Dogs Legions, Far Cry 6, Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Total War Three Kingdoms,
Shadow of the Tomb Raider, CS:GO, and Forza Horizon 5 were all put through rigorous testing. An NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 was also tested, but solely on the Intel-based machine, and the Arc A380 outperformed it by 7% in Total War Three Kingdoms. Combining Intel Arc graphics cards and AMD processors appears to be a bad idea (for the time being).
The Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU seems not as good at gaming as it is in benchmarks - 06/22/2022 08:36 AM
The Intel Arc A380 graphics card for desktops is widely available in China. The RX 6500 XT from AMD and the GTX 1650 from NVIDIA are both better. In DirectX 11 tests, the A380 is 22 to 26 percent slow...
Intel Arc A380 custom card debuts at roughly 595 USD - 06/20/2022 09:19 AM
The GUNNIR Intel ARC A380 graphics card that was announced last week in Asia is priced at 3999 RMB, which is 595 USD as spotted on the Intel JD website. ...
Intel Arc A380 with 6GB memory launches (updated) - 06/15/2022 08:54 AM
Specifications and gameplay performance of the Intel Arc A380 desktop graphics card are disclosed. The info leaked by displaying a gaming PC with an Intel Core i5-12400F and the Arc A380 in China, the...
Intel Arc A730M Game Tests; gaming performance differs from synthetic performance. - 06/07/2022 02:03 PM
Yesterday's report regarding the Intel Arc A730M GPU's 3DMark Time Spy score sounded good, today some game perf has leaked...
In 3DMark, the Intel Arc A730M outperformed the RTX 3070 Mobile - 06/06/2022 06:18 PM
A Twitter user known as (translated) "Golden Pig Upgrade" posted a result from a 3DMark Time Spy benchmark test with a 10138 GPU Score. ...
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 18890
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 18890
Joined: 2008-08-28
#6028005 Posted on: 06/24/2022 09:21 AM
Intel making all the wrong choices when it comes to Arc. This is going downhill very rapidly.
Intel making all the wrong choices when it comes to Arc. This is going downhill very rapidly.
asturur
Senior Member
Posts: 1211
Joined: 2010-05-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1211
Joined: 2010-05-12
#6028008 Posted on: 06/24/2022 09:39 AM
I don't think is on purpose.
But i bet that the priority assignment to amd related optimization will be always low.
Also isn't 1-10% the generic edge higher speed clocked intels have on amd?
I don't think is on purpose.
But i bet that the priority assignment to amd related optimization will be always low.
Also isn't 1-10% the generic edge higher speed clocked intels have on amd?
asturur
Senior Member
Posts: 1211
Joined: 2010-05-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1211
Joined: 2010-05-12
#6028009 Posted on: 06/24/2022 09:39 AM
Also without knowing how the gtx1650 is doing on both cpu seems pointless.
Also without knowing how the gtx1650 is doing on both cpu seems pointless.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 18890
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 18890
Joined: 2008-08-28
#6028011 Posted on: 06/24/2022 10:02 AM
Its doing the same on both.
Also without knowing how the gtx1650 is doing on both cpu seems pointless.
Its doing the same on both.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2945
Joined: 2013-03-10
If this is on purpose, I can't see it as a good decision. Intel discrete GPUs aren't in a strong position (actually in no position for the time being), so Intel should do everything within their power to make sure they are as attractive to every single customer as possible. Although if Intel plans to have them found only inside prebuilt OEM PCs, it doesn't matter so much. It's a foregone conclusion the OEMs would get better deals with both the CPU and GPU from Intel. However, with potential customers with an existing PC they are otherwise happy with but only want to upgrade the graphics card, this would be a bad game plan. You never know, but I guess this is just one sign of the Intel drivers being in a bad shape, which would be one more reason for the repeated postponement of the release. If Intel can't get the drivers up to the expected functionality on their own Intel PCs, getting them there on AMD PCs would be a secondary priority.