Synology DS620slim Gigabit NAS Review
Fractal Design Vector RS review
Corsair iCUE 465X review
be quiet! Pure Base 500 review
Borderlands 3: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Swiftech H240 X3 AIO review
Promo: URCDKey Autumn Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Corsair HS35 Stereo Gaming Headset Review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X review
Gears of War 5: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Intel also launches Coffee Lake Desktop Refresh processors
New additions to the 9th Gen Intel Core desktop processor family were also introduced today, coffee lake.
The 9th Gen Intel Core desktop processor lineup now includes more than 25 total products with options ranging from Intel Core i3 up to Intel Core i9 with amazing performance and flexibility to meet a range of consumer needs from everyday productivity to gaming to content creation. The family also brings Pentium Gold and Celeron products to market for entry-level computing, giving consumers even more options to find the right desktop to fit their specific need and budgets. New capabilities include:
- Up to 47% more FPS while gaming.15
- Up to 2.1 times faster video editing compared with a 5-year old PC for 4K and 360 video editing experiences.16
- Intel Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) with gigabit Wi-Fi speeds delivering almost three times faster than standard 2×2 AC, and 40% faster than Intel® Wireless-AC (Gigabit).17
- Up to 8 cores and 16 threads, up to 5 GHz maximum turbo frequency, up to 16 MB Intel Smart Cache and up to 40 platform PCIe lanes.
Intel Also Announces Xeon E-2100 Series processors - 11/05/2018 09:58 AM
The Xeon E-2100 processor is targeted at small- and medium-size businesses and cloud service providers. The processor supports workloads suitable for entry-level servers....
Intel Also Reports Third-Quarter 2018 Financial Results - 10/26/2018 09:00 AM
Intel Corporation today reported third-quarter 2018 financial results. Third-quarter revenue of $19.2 billion was an all-time record, up 19 percent YoY driven by broad business strength and customer p...
Intel Alpine Ridge Thunderbolt 3 - does 40 Gbps - 06/05/2015 01:04 PM
Intel released information on Thunderbolt 3. Now if you have followed our Computex news, you would have noticed that some motherboards offer support through USB 3.1 (10Gbps) through a Thunderbolt chip...
Intel Alpine Ridge ThunderBolt can do 40 Gbps - 04/21/2014 09:09 AM
A slide from an Intel presentation leaked today, and it is showing some interesting developments for thunderbolt. The WAAAAY too expensive connector keeps on progressing in performance though. The lat...
Intel also plans SSD price cuts in August - 07/13/2012 11:10 AM
Intel is planning to cut prices of its SSD 320, SSD 330 and SSD 520 series in August. The chip giant will cut prices by up to 37 percent, but pricing of some models like the SSD 320 series' lower-capa...
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9682
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9682
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5662660 Posted on: 04/23/2019 07:25 PM
Saves you time going into BIOS to disable it.
What exactly is the point of having a version without an igpu, that costs exactly the same?
Saves you time going into BIOS to disable it.
ezpzTP
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2015-10-06
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2015-10-06
#5662756 Posted on: 04/24/2019 12:31 AM
Is this the new stepping I've been hearing about?
Is this the new stepping I've been hearing about?
Andrew LB
Senior Member
Posts: 1046
Joined: 2012-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1046
Joined: 2012-05-22
#5662893 Posted on: 04/24/2019 11:34 AM
Initial testing seems to look like it clocks better than the GPU enabled version.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-9900kf-vs-9900k-overclock-comparison,6038.html
What exactly is the point of having a version without an igpu, that costs exactly the same?
Initial testing seems to look like it clocks better than the GPU enabled version.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-9900kf-vs-9900k-overclock-comparison,6038.html
__hollywood|meo
Senior Member
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2005-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2005-09-27
#5662919 Posted on: 04/24/2019 12:59 PM
nice of them to charge us for silicon that isnt even on the chip, huh?
nice of them to charge us for silicon that isnt even on the chip, huh?
TalentX
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 2019-04-10
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 2019-04-10
#5662926 Posted on: 04/24/2019 01:16 PM
what's more ridiculous is that they think people are willingly ready to upgrade their CPU several times every year. I always hated intel's bs called "tick-tock" model, which is more like a tick-tock-tock-tock-tock now.
Besides, they still have problems solving their hardware security vulnerabilities. What's the point of selling "refreshes" of broken chips, that are still broken?
what's more ridiculous is that they think people are willingly ready to upgrade their CPU several times every year. I always hated intel's bs called "tick-tock" model, which is more like a tick-tock-tock-tock-tock now.
Besides, they still have problems solving their hardware security vulnerabilities. What's the point of selling "refreshes" of broken chips, that are still broken?
user1
Senior Member
Posts: 1360
Joined: 2016-01-29
Senior Member
Posts: 1360
Joined: 2016-01-29
#5662934 Posted on: 04/24/2019 01:46 PM
Initial testing seems to look like it clocks better than the GPU enabled version.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-9900kf-vs-9900k-overclock-comparison,6038.html
That Probably has more to do with the new r0 stepping , than the sku.
I'd wager you'll probably see newer 9900k's that are based off the same stepping.
if anything, these new chips are an attempt to salvage more broken sillicon, since they are production limited.
pretty piss poor value regardless, not that the igpu really helps all that much.
Initial testing seems to look like it clocks better than the GPU enabled version.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-9900kf-vs-9900k-overclock-comparison,6038.html
That Probably has more to do with the new r0 stepping , than the sku.
I'd wager you'll probably see newer 9900k's that are based off the same stepping.
if anything, these new chips are an attempt to salvage more broken sillicon, since they are production limited.
pretty piss poor value regardless, not that the igpu really helps all that much.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11586
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11586
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5662935 Posted on: 04/24/2019 01:49 PM
No igpu and 100mhz higher overclock, Intel - 100$ more over 9900k please.
No igpu and 100mhz higher overclock, Intel - 100$ more over 9900k please.
Venix
Senior Member
Posts: 902
Joined: 2016-08-01
Senior Member
Posts: 902
Joined: 2016-08-01
#5663203 Posted on: 04/25/2019 05:39 AM
While most people would gladly forfeit the igpu for a cheaper price i do not think they will for equal or greater price even as a graphics card being almost useless in gaming it comes in handy troubleshooting and quick synch is nice to have! So well if i am to buy an intel cpu ....no thank you i will pay less and keep the benefits even if there is a chance i would never use em!
While most people would gladly forfeit the igpu for a cheaper price i do not think they will for equal or greater price even as a graphics card being almost useless in gaming it comes in handy troubleshooting and quick synch is nice to have! So well if i am to buy an intel cpu ....no thank you i will pay less and keep the benefits even if there is a chance i would never use em!
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 5237
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 5237
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5663218 Posted on: 04/25/2019 07:11 AM
Exactly this.
And I think we need technology that utilizes iGPU when in desktop or browsing and fully puts GPU to sleep, no wasted energy.
EDIT: wait, you can't put dGPU to sleep if monitor connected to it...
While most people would gladly forfeit the igpu for a cheaper price i do not think they will for equal or greater price even as a graphics card being almost useless in gaming it comes in handy troubleshooting and quick synch is nice to have! So well if i am to buy an intel cpu ....no thank you i will pay less and keep the benefits even if there is a chance i would never use em!
Exactly this.
And I think we need technology that utilizes iGPU when in desktop or browsing and fully puts GPU to sleep, no wasted energy.
EDIT: wait, you can't put dGPU to sleep if monitor connected to it...
Venix
Senior Member
Posts: 902
Joined: 2016-08-01
Senior Member
Posts: 902
Joined: 2016-08-01
#5663324 Posted on: 04/25/2019 01:37 PM
EDIT: wait, you can't put dGPU to sleep if monitor connected to it...
well you can pass-through the signal threw the igpu if you want with out any hit on performance .... but when i had igpu i just had one monitor on each .... when the main screen went off ! ((rip my gtx 770 !)) my 2ndary monitor still was working fine so i was able to diagnose fast .
i am not sure if you can put the d.gpu to completely shut off though ... never tried like that .
EDIT: wait, you can't put dGPU to sleep if monitor connected to it...
well you can pass-through the signal threw the igpu if you want with out any hit on performance .... but when i had igpu i just had one monitor on each .... when the main screen went off ! ((rip my gtx 770 !)) my 2ndary monitor still was working fine so i was able to diagnose fast .
i am not sure if you can put the d.gpu to completely shut off though ... never tried like that .
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 10628
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 10628
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5663325 Posted on: 04/25/2019 01:45 PM
While you are right, the issue is that actually, CPUs without the iGPU should be cheaper. That they are not gives your argument strength, when in reality, it could be otherwise.
It's just because Intel doesn't fabricate CPUs without the iGPU in the first place, it's probably still on the chip and just laser cut, no? If they'd make (smaller!) chips without the iGPU they'd be cheaper and with higher yields... it's just Intel's plan to make things that do less cost more so Intel themselves have an easier life.
And honestly, I did not ever use an iGPU besides my Ryzen 2400G because it's the HTPC which does not need much GPU power at all. Other than that, I will gladly skip any CPU with an iGPU. But that's a thing of point of view, especially with Intel's twisted pricing due to their fabrication choices.
While most people would gladly forfeit the igpu for a cheaper price i do not think they will for equal or greater price even as a graphics card being almost useless in gaming it comes in handy troubleshooting and quick synch is nice to have! So well if i am to buy an intel cpu ....no thank you i will pay less and keep the benefits even if there is a chance i would never use em!
While you are right, the issue is that actually, CPUs without the iGPU should be cheaper. That they are not gives your argument strength, when in reality, it could be otherwise.
It's just because Intel doesn't fabricate CPUs without the iGPU in the first place, it's probably still on the chip and just laser cut, no? If they'd make (smaller!) chips without the iGPU they'd be cheaper and with higher yields... it's just Intel's plan to make things that do less cost more so Intel themselves have an easier life.
And honestly, I did not ever use an iGPU besides my Ryzen 2400G because it's the HTPC which does not need much GPU power at all. Other than that, I will gladly skip any CPU with an iGPU. But that's a thing of point of view, especially with Intel's twisted pricing due to their fabrication choices.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1360
Joined: 2016-01-29
What exactly is the point of having a version without an igpu, that costs exactly the same?