Kingston KC3000 PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
EnGenius ECS2512FP. 8-port 2.5G Cloud Switch review
Deepcool CG560 chassis review
Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
Intel adds new performance Mobile CPUs like Core i7-4940MX
Intel just releases a price-list marking no less then 10 new Mobile CPUs, out of which half of them are beefy alright. You'll five Core i7 models, four Core i5s and also a Celeron chip. The most high-end model is the Core i7-4940MX that comes with a good 4 cores and is clocked at 3.1 GHz.
The whopping price for the 4940 is $1,096 (!). Other mobile processors are the 4910MQ abd 4810, but also three ultra-low voltage CPUs namely the Core i5-4360U, i5-4310U and then that Celeron 2980U. Prices vary widely, but have a peek at that overview as listed below I'd say:
Intel adds four 17W mobile Sandy Brige CPUs - 06/22/2011 10:07 AM
Intel has released out four new Sandy Bridge laptop processors with a TDP of just 17W. All four offerings have 17W thermal envelopes and FCBGA1023 ball-grid-array packages, so they're sure to show up ...
Intel adds three CPUs (silently) to lineup - 01/20/2010 01:08 PM
Apparently Intel has added three LGA775 processors to its lineup. Priced at $183 you will spot the Q9500, a quad-core processor with its
Intel adds embedded quad-core CPU to its line-up - 10/22/2008 07:55 AM
Intel unveiled a new Core 2 Quad Q9400 processor designed for "embedded" applications. This chip gets seven years of support and is validated with Intel Q45 and Intel 3210 chipsets. Doug Dav...
Ven0m
Senior Member
Posts: 1813
Joined: 2005-08-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1813
Joined: 2005-08-12
#4747147 Posted on: 01/20/2014 11:01 AM
Geeze, $1096 for a mobile CPU !
The i7-4910MQ @ +- half the price is a better option imo.
While I'd rather opt for i7-4910MQ over i7-4940MX, as you suggested, I can still see it as a viable option.
Extreme CPU, while overpriced, allow overclocking. So if a laptop manufacturer opts for mobo, bios, and cooling that allow overclocking, it may have sense. If I remember correctly, some Alienware (and perhaps other) laptops allowed quite a lot of OC. In such case, you pay for computing power significantly greater than specs would suggest.
Geeze, $1096 for a mobile CPU !
The i7-4910MQ @ +- half the price is a better option imo.
While I'd rather opt for i7-4910MQ over i7-4940MX, as you suggested, I can still see it as a viable option.
Extreme CPU, while overpriced, allow overclocking. So if a laptop manufacturer opts for mobo, bios, and cooling that allow overclocking, it may have sense. If I remember correctly, some Alienware (and perhaps other) laptops allowed quite a lot of OC. In such case, you pay for computing power significantly greater than specs would suggest.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1570
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1570
Joined: 2012-10-07
#4747154 Posted on: 01/20/2014 11:17 AM
Yeah, high end CPU's are always super expensive, it almost seems exponential! It's never the value purchase.
Yeah, high end CPU's are always super expensive, it almost seems exponential! It's never the value purchase.
V@IO
Senior Member
Posts: 494
Joined: 2010-04-12
Senior Member
Posts: 494
Joined: 2010-04-12
#4747156 Posted on: 01/20/2014 11:23 AM
While I'd rather opt for i7-4910MQ over i7-4940MX, as you suggested, I can still see it as a viable option.
Extreme CPU, while overpriced, allow overclocking. So if a laptop manufacturer opts for mobo, bios, and cooling that allow overclocking, it may have sense. If I remember correctly, some Alienware (and perhaps other) laptops allowed quite a lot of OC. In such case, you pay for computing power significantly greater than specs would suggest.
Aah yes i forgot that the "X" is an extreme edition which i obviously the main reason for the huge price difference. In that case then yes it might be worth it for some, personally i think it will be very challenging to keep that chip cool on a high over-clock though.
While I'd rather opt for i7-4910MQ over i7-4940MX, as you suggested, I can still see it as a viable option.
Extreme CPU, while overpriced, allow overclocking. So if a laptop manufacturer opts for mobo, bios, and cooling that allow overclocking, it may have sense. If I remember correctly, some Alienware (and perhaps other) laptops allowed quite a lot of OC. In such case, you pay for computing power significantly greater than specs would suggest.
Aah yes i forgot that the "X" is an extreme edition which i obviously the main reason for the huge price difference. In that case then yes it might be worth it for some, personally i think it will be very challenging to keep that chip cool on a high over-clock though.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6204
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6204
Joined: 2012-11-10
#4747281 Posted on: 01/20/2014 03:53 PM
What gain does intel have with price points like these? These prices aren't attractive to anyone - if they want to help declining PC sales, maybe they need to stop beating the dead horse that is AMD and start giving people reasons to buy x86 over ARM. With quad and octa core tablets and phones, the average person doesn't need anything much better. Intel is in their own idiotic world if they think they're going to "win" by acting like their price point is reasonable - $9 billion in PROFITS clearly shows they don't even know what to do with the money. For a company that prides in being "innovators of tomorrow", proportionate to their income, they're by far the least innovative of their competitors. AMD, nvidia, Samsung, TI, and arguably even VIA have all done something to change their strategy to meet with the new age of products, but Intel continues to tread the exact same path with minor tweaks for years. Then, they whine about why nobody wants to use them for phones and tablets.
What gain does intel have with price points like these? These prices aren't attractive to anyone - if they want to help declining PC sales, maybe they need to stop beating the dead horse that is AMD and start giving people reasons to buy x86 over ARM. With quad and octa core tablets and phones, the average person doesn't need anything much better. Intel is in their own idiotic world if they think they're going to "win" by acting like their price point is reasonable - $9 billion in PROFITS clearly shows they don't even know what to do with the money. For a company that prides in being "innovators of tomorrow", proportionate to their income, they're by far the least innovative of their competitors. AMD, nvidia, Samsung, TI, and arguably even VIA have all done something to change their strategy to meet with the new age of products, but Intel continues to tread the exact same path with minor tweaks for years. Then, they whine about why nobody wants to use them for phones and tablets.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 494
Joined: 2010-04-12
Geeze, $1096 for a mobile CPU !
The i7-4910MQ @ +- half the price is a better option imo.