Intel Core i5 11400F processor review
Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 3600 MHz 32GB review
ASRock Z590 Extreme review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
Intel adds new performance Mobile CPUs like Core i7-4940MX
Intel just releases a price-list marking no less then 10 new Mobile CPUs, out of which half of them are beefy alright. You'll five Core i7 models, four Core i5s and also a Celeron chip. The most high-end model is the Core i7-4940MX that comes with a good 4 cores and is clocked at 3.1 GHz.
The whopping price for the 4940 is $1,096 (!). Other mobile processors are the 4910MQ abd 4810, but also three ultra-low voltage CPUs namely the Core i5-4360U, i5-4310U and then that Celeron 2980U. Prices vary widely, but have a peek at that overview as listed below I'd say:
« Philips 284E5QHAD 28-Inch MHL-Ready Full HD Monitor · Intel adds new performance Mobile CPUs like Core i7-4940MX
· Club 3D R7 260 royalQueen Graphics Card »
Intel adds four 17W mobile Sandy Brige CPUs - 06/22/2011 10:07 AM
Intel has released out four new Sandy Bridge laptop processors with a TDP of just 17W. All four offerings have 17W thermal envelopes and FCBGA1023 ball-grid-array packages, so they're sure to show up ...
Intel adds three CPUs (silently) to lineup - 01/20/2010 01:08 PM
Apparently Intel has added three LGA775 processors to its lineup. Priced at $183 you will spot the Q9500, a quad-core processor with its
Intel adds embedded quad-core CPU to its line-up - 10/22/2008 07:55 AM
Intel unveiled a new Core 2 Quad Q9400 processor designed for "embedded" applications. This chip gets seven years of support and is validated with Intel Q45 and Intel 3210 chipsets. Doug Dav...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5749
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5749
Joined: 2012-11-10
#4747324 Posted on: 01/20/2014 05:08 PM
I see Intel is continuing their confusing naming scheme for their mobile processors.
Desktop i7 49xx model = 6 cores with HT
Dekstop i7 48xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 49xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 48xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 46xx model = 2 cores with HT
Laptop i5 43xx model = 2 cores with HT
Laptop Celeron 29xx model = 2 cores.
Any time I order laptops, I always have to go look up the specific CPU model numbers because the naming scheme of the laptop processors is so retarded.
The numbering scheme should be the same across Desktop and Laptop processors.
The naming scheme is based on instructions, not number of cores. The number scheme... I have no idea - I too find it asinine. A laptop dual core i7 has the same instruction sets as a desktop 6 core, even though it could be slower than a desktop i3. The only thing that doesn't make sense to me is I thought HT was technically a special instruction, so I'm not sure why the mobile i5 has HT while the desktop version doesn't.
Anyway that being said, assuming you have a laptop with a discrete GPU, you can probably get nearly equal performance out of a dual core i3 with HT as you can with a dual core i7 with HT. Most (not all) laptops can't really take advantage of an i7's bonus instructions.
I see Intel is continuing their confusing naming scheme for their mobile processors.
Desktop i7 49xx model = 6 cores with HT
Dekstop i7 48xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 49xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 48xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 46xx model = 2 cores with HT
Laptop i5 43xx model = 2 cores with HT
Laptop Celeron 29xx model = 2 cores.
Any time I order laptops, I always have to go look up the specific CPU model numbers because the naming scheme of the laptop processors is so retarded.
The numbering scheme should be the same across Desktop and Laptop processors.
The naming scheme is based on instructions, not number of cores. The number scheme... I have no idea - I too find it asinine. A laptop dual core i7 has the same instruction sets as a desktop 6 core, even though it could be slower than a desktop i3. The only thing that doesn't make sense to me is I thought HT was technically a special instruction, so I'm not sure why the mobile i5 has HT while the desktop version doesn't.
Anyway that being said, assuming you have a laptop with a discrete GPU, you can probably get nearly equal performance out of a dual core i3 with HT as you can with a dual core i7 with HT. Most (not all) laptops can't really take advantage of an i7's bonus instructions.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2006-11-10
I see Intel is continuing their confusing naming scheme for their mobile processors.
Desktop i7 49xx model = 6 cores with HT
Dekstop i7 48xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 49xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 48xx model = 4 cores with HT
Laptop i7 46xx model = 2 cores with HT
Laptop i5 43xx model = 2 cores with HT
Laptop Celeron 29xx model = 2 cores.
Any time I order laptops, I always have to go look up the specific CPU model numbers because the naming scheme of the laptop processors is so retarded.
The numbering scheme should be the same across Desktop and Laptop processors.