Intel acquires maker of Killer chips Rivet Networks
Rivet will become part of the Wireless Solutions Group within Intel's Client Computing Group, the chipmaker will continue to offer the Killer software to its customers, mostly known for its gaming packet prioritation.
Intel announced the acquisition of Rivet Networks which handles network technologies such as the "Killer" brand for gamers. Financial terms of the acquisition have not been disclosed. Rivet Networks is a terrific complement to our existing Wi-Fi products and helps us further our vision of delivering PC platforms that power every person’s greatest contribution. Rivet Networks’ products deliver speed, intelligence and control for gamers and performance users. Its products maximize Wi-Fi bandwidth utilization and optimize the wireless network connection on your platform. In addition, Rivet Networks’ products can also utilize the combination of Ethernet and Wi-Fi to prioritize traffic over both connections.
Its team will join our Wireless Solutions Group within the Client Computing Group. Rivet Networks’ key products, including its Killer brand, will integrate into Intel’s broader PC Wi-Fi portfolio. With the addition of Rivet Networks’ software, we will license its software to customers and develop new solutions for broader PC connectivity enhancement. With Rivet Networks’ and Intel’s leading Wi-Fi products, we can scale our PC Wi-Fi portfolio to better serve our customers, ecosystem and channel partners.
In addition to an expanding portfolio of Wi-Fi solutions for PC Platforms, we continue to advocate for Wi-Fi standards, contribute to the developer ecosystem and deliver new value for our PC OEM customers. More specifically:
- Leading the development and testing of 801.11ax (Wi-Fi 6): Intel took a lead role in the industry to define and deliver Wi-Fi 6 to the market. Our products were ahead of the competition and were selected as the “test bed” for Wi-Fi 6 certification. We also delivered the world’s first Wi-Fi 6 client for PCs, delivering over 1.2 Gbps throughput. But even more important, Intel led the ecosystem in conducting interoperability testing with Cisco, Aruba, Broadcom, Qualcomm and Microsoft to ensure great user experiences in new Wi-Fi 6 and legacy network implementations.
- Advocating for Wi-Fi Standards: We are strong advocates for Wi-Fi 6 and beyond, having worked closely with the FCC, ecosystem and standards bodies to ensure interoperability, to drive new and innovative capabilities into the standards, and to advocate for spectrum and certification policy issues. Most recently, the FCC opened 1200 MHz of 6 GHz spectrum to unlicensed Wi-Fi use, which will significantly improve Wi-Fi for all Americans. Opening this band will enable significant new capacity and ensure more opportunities for the Wi-Fi ecosystem that is relied on by millions of people and businesses.
- Developing the Best PC and Connectivity Experiences:
- Wi-Fi 6 Desktop Developer Kit: We launched an Intel Wi-Fi 6 Desktop developer kit to bring Gigabit+ wireless speeds to new and existing desktop PCs. The kit can be installed in less than 10 minutes and provides a max wireless speed of 2.4 Gbps, which is nearly three times faster than the standard AC 2×2 module with 80 MHz channels and 75 percent lower latency for gaming and video conferencing. It also allows for four times greater capacity of devices on a network. This kit was designed with DIYers and small- to medium-size businesses.
- Project Athena: Project Athena is a multiyear innovation program designed to deliver a new class of advanced laptops. The program is rooted in user insights and real-life situations. Together with our OEM partners, we’ve leveraged these insights to build PCs that fit at least six criteria that enable the most seamless PC experiences. One of the central features of Project Athena is to create devices that include a fast and persistent connection with Intel® Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) and optional Gigabit LTE. We have verified more than 40 devices that meet the Project Athena specification.
We are committed to enabling our customers to deliver the best PC experiences, especially when we have become more reliant on technology. We know how important connectivity is in enriching our lives. We will keep you updated on our progress and look forward to having the Rivet Networks team as part of the Intel family, developing technologies that matter to you.
Intel accidentally posts 9th gen H-series specs online - 02/17/2019 10:37 AM
Intel had a bit of a boo-boo moment yesterday as they published the specifications for the 9th generation Core series H processors. The Core i9-9980HK will be the flagship model, but will also be the...
Intel acquires LSI Axxia Networking Business - 08/14/2014 09:04 AM
Avago Technologies Limited and Intel Corporation today announced the signing of a definitive agreement for Intel to acquire LSI's Axxia Networking Business and related assets for $650 million in cash...
Senior Member
Posts: 6691
Joined: 2012-11-10
I also don't really understand what Intel would get out of this. Intel is actually pretty damn good at writing drivers, so I don't know why they'd want to associate with a brand that is known for poor drivers. As others pointed out, Intel owns the chipsets, so they're not gaining new electrical technology. I'm sure Intel could come up with their own in-house solution to compete with the improved performance.
What I do know is this will only be good news for us. Intel will either:
A. Axe the brand, so we no longer have this expensive mediocre nonsense.
B. Make it cheaper, since they're basically cutting out the middle-man (yes people, Intel does make hardware that's a good/cheap price)
C. Bring the driver standards up to their level
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Joined: 2017-12-21
what "Intel Nics" doesn’t know how to do is manage the network layers... anyone studying network systems knows that "Ms-Windows" is the OS-Mazes of network flow par excellence... from where I connect... I had +200 ms in online games and since I adopted it "Killer" and now I have 30-40 ms.
But I think the knowledge of Intel and the Killer system could do some good work... ... for us...
I am well aware of the problems of the Killer Control Center, but tell me... what is the hardware/software developer who does things perfectly!?
Junior Member
Posts: 22221
Joined: 2008-07-14
what "Intel Nics" doesn’t know how to do is manage the network layers... anyone studying network systems knows that "Ms-Windows" is the OS-Mazes of network flow par excellence... from where I connect... I had +200 ms in online games and since I adopted it "Killer" and now I have 30-40 ms.
But I think the knowledge of Intel and the Killer system could do some good work... ... for us...
I am well aware of the problems of the Killer Control Center, but tell me... what is the hardware/software developer who does things perfectly!?
Sounds like you have/had a configuration issue.... I'm running an Intel I219V on my MSI Z170A Gaming Pro and Intel 82574L with my MSI B350 Tomahawk and neither have seen latency anywhere close to 200ms.... I'm generally in the 30-60ms range. Even with my integrated RTL8111H, I don't get close to 200ms, and Realtek is the king of excessively high latency.
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2020-05-21
My standard question when friends or gaming buddies have connection issues is: "Do you have a killer lan onboard?'' and 9 out of 10 that usually is the culprit, updating the driver also fixes it 9 out of 10 times.
To me they feel no worse or better then Intel nics when they're working fine, their drivers just suck sometimes, reminding me of creative's driver mess back in the day.
So me and my friends tend to avoid them when choosing new mobo's and always try to get an Intel nic, even on the AMD boards

Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-02-14
I don't post often but I am coming out of the woodwork to say Killer NICs sucked. Their software was awful and the performance of their hardware was poor. I say this sitting next to a PC with a PCI-E Intel NIC in it because the onboard Killer NIC stunk.
I am sure Intel is purchasing them just for the name and not for the tech.
I agree. My MB has both killer and Intel chips and I use Intel. Maybee Intel wanted patents since Rivet was a spin off from Qualcomm there could be some much needed patents lying around? Maybee they wanted the packet prioritization tech which did have a silicon component that rivet would licence to others? Not sure but it does seem a bit odd unless Intel picked them up cheap.