ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review
MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO review
Guru3D Q1 Winter 20/21 PC Buyer Guide
AOC CU34G2X monitor review
Intel 22nm smartphone SoC delayed to 2014
It's interesting to see how many Intel slide decks have surfaced e.g. leaked on the web this week. Here's another one, Intel slides show that the company's 22nm smartphone chip are delayed to Q1 2014 at the earliest. The lowest-power ValleyView chip is likely to be the Bay Trail-T, which offers a sub-3W TDP. The Bay Trail-M has a sub-4W to 6.5W TDP, while Bay Trail-D offers a sub-12W TDP. These chips are aimed towards tablets and budget notebooks.
Full details can be read at DailyTech BTW. To be fair, it did seem overly ambitious to somehow be able to jam out ValleyView/Silvermont in 2013. Not only is the release a die shrink, which adds the FinFET "3D" transistor design first employed in 2012's Ivy Bridge personal computer chip release, but it also adds other features like a seventh generation graphics core (with DirectX 11 support). Also added is support for DDR3L (the low powered version of DDR3 for mobile devices), USB 3.0, and on-die security/authentication features.
The chip also undergoes important structural changes; most notably, the current CedarView is comprised of 2 SoCs (processor+chipset), while the ValleyView brings the chipset onto the processor die, unifying the two chips into a single die. The chip will also be the first Atom to be offered in a quad-core variety.
MSI's Z68 (G3)/H61 (G3) Series Mobo support Intel 22 nm Processors - 02/23/2012 11:37 PM
Great news for the ones that bought a MSI's Z68 (G3)/H61 (G3) Series Mobo as these motherboards will support Intel 22 nm Processors. MSI announces today that MSI's Z68 (G3)/H61 (G3) series of motherb...
Intel 22nm Ivy Bridge benchmarks surface - 07/06/2011 09:24 AM
Some benchmark results of Intel's 22nm Ivy Bridge processor with 1155-pin socket have surfaced on the web, you can check it out at Asian tech site Coolaler. The results were published by overclocker C...
Intel 22nm Ivy Bridge further delayed to March 2012 - 06/22/2011 09:10 AM
Word from DigiTimes is that Intel has decided to postpone to arrival of its 22nm Ivy Bridge processors to March 2012. These chips were originally expected by the end of this year, but the chip giant h...
PhazeDelta1
Moderator
Posts: 15616
Joined: 2010-09-12
Moderator
Posts: 15616
Joined: 2010-09-12
#4494242 Posted on: 01/06/2013 01:09 AM
im al for branching out. But maybe intel should stay out of the cell phone market.
im al for branching out. But maybe intel should stay out of the cell phone market.
JohnMaclane
Senior Member
Posts: 4824
Joined: 2004-05-20
Senior Member
Posts: 4824
Joined: 2004-05-20
#4494321 Posted on: 01/06/2013 03:16 AM
With the traditional PC market shrinking it's not a matter of branching out, it's a matter of surviving in the mobile world.
Without mobile products which bring tangible benefits x86 will become irrelevant. The future of Intel rests on delivering tangibly better chips (with better margins Intel is accustomed to) then ARM competitors.
im al for branching out. But maybe intel should stay out of the cell phone market.
With the traditional PC market shrinking it's not a matter of branching out, it's a matter of surviving in the mobile world.
Without mobile products which bring tangible benefits x86 will become irrelevant. The future of Intel rests on delivering tangibly better chips (with better margins Intel is accustomed to) then ARM competitors.
orion24
Senior Member
Posts: 836
Joined: 2005-09-17
Senior Member
Posts: 836
Joined: 2005-09-17
#4494364 Posted on: 01/06/2013 05:25 AM
They would still survive with traditional PC. I'd rather say it is profitability that makes them enter the promising smartphone market.
With the traditional PC market shrinking it's not a matter of branching out, it's a matter of surviving in the mobile world
They would still survive with traditional PC. I'd rather say it is profitability that makes them enter the promising smartphone market.
JohnMaclane
Senior Member
Posts: 4824
Joined: 2004-05-20
Senior Member
Posts: 4824
Joined: 2004-05-20
#4494414 Posted on: 01/06/2013 06:52 AM
Not really, ARM may sell more chips but device manufacturers have crappy margins since a typical SoC will sell for 20$ while Intel has huge margins on desktop parts which run into hundreds of dollars.
Intel would be very happy if the traditional PC market wasn't shrinking and that they could ignore smartphones. The reality is different and technology is moving towards device integration, this means Intel needs to figure out how to make money in the soc market.
They would still survive with traditional PC. I'd rather say it is profitability that makes them enter the promising smartphone market.
Not really, ARM may sell more chips but device manufacturers have crappy margins since a typical SoC will sell for 20$ while Intel has huge margins on desktop parts which run into hundreds of dollars.
Intel would be very happy if the traditional PC market wasn't shrinking and that they could ignore smartphones. The reality is different and technology is moving towards device integration, this means Intel needs to figure out how to make money in the soc market.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 19051
Joined: 2009-01-25
It's interesting to see how many Intel slide decks have surfaced e.g. leaked on the web this week. Here's another one,Â*Â*Intel slides show Â*that the company's 22nm smartphone chip are delayed to ...
Intel 22nm smartphone SoC delayed to 2014
This might actually give ARM a bit of breathing space which may hurt Intel by the time they release this in 2014... If Intel wants to stay competitive, they need the chip out by end of 2013.
deltatux