Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
High-Speed DDR5-6400 low latency CL32 Kit from G.SKILL is now available
G.SKILL is very excited to be releasing the DDR5-6400 CL32 32GB (2x16GB) memory kit. It's already in stores.
G.SKILL is delighted to announce the launch of an extremely low-latency, high-speed DDR5-6400 CL32 32GB (2x16GB) memory kit under the Trident Z5 family memory series, designed for the latest 12th Gen Intel® Core™ desktop processors and Intel® Z690 chipset motherboards.
Extreme Low Latency CL32 at DDR5-6400
Dedicated to developing ever-faster memory modules, G.SKILL is launching an ultra-low latency DDR5-6400 CL32-39-39-102 memory kit at 1.40V with 32GB (2x16GB) kit capacity. Equipped with exceptionally tight timings, this extreme memory specification represents the next step of the Trident Z5 family flagship performance. The screenshot below shows this memory kit validated on the Intel® Core™ i7-12700K processor and ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero motherboard.
Availability
The DDR5-6400 CL32 32GB (2x16GB) memory kits under the Trident Z5 and Trident Z5 RGB series is available now via G.SKILL worldwide distribution partners.
iiyama introduces two game LCDs that allow high-speed drawing at a rate of 165Hz / 0.5ms. - 09/15/2021 08:44 AM
Manufactured by the iiyama brand and has a refresh rate of 165Hz and response time of 0.5ms, making it prototypical for gaming. The LCD panel in both cases is a non-glare IPS system, and they are bot...
With PCIe Gen 5.0 Components, Phison Enters the High-Speed IC Market - 08/12/2021 08:53 AM
Phison entered into the high-speed interface IC market with the introduction of its PS7101, a PCIe 5.0 Redriver IC with high gain and high linearity, which solves the signal attenuation caused by the ...
PNY adds 4,00MHz ultra-high-speed model to XLR8 Gaming EPIC-X RGB OC memory - 07/23/2021 08:48 AM
A high clock frequency model has been added to the DDR4 overclocking memory "XLR8 Gaming EPIC-X RGB" equipped with an illumination function using addressable RGB LEDs....
TEAMGROUP Launches the High-speed T-FORCE CARDEA Z44Q PCIe4.0 SSD with up-to 4 TB Capacity - 06/24/2021 09:46 AM
TEAMGROUP unveils the T-FORCE CARDEA Z44Q PCIe4.0 SSD with two patented cooling modules, QLC Flash, and PCIe Gen4x4 interface that supports the latest NVMe1.4 standard and provides a massive capacity ...
Glorious "Model D Wireless", a high-speed wireless mouse - 06/03/2021 08:18 AM
Glorious Model D Wireless, a high-speed wireless mouse with a 69g lightweight body and low-latency sensor....
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 8220
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 8220
Joined: 2020-08-03
#5988043 Posted on: 01/29/2022 03:44 PM
Do you have an example of things that scale well?
Anandtech shows very bad scaling with Mem speed.
Winrar is 10% boost when compressing, from 4800 CL36 to 6400 CL36 (Good but expensive boost). Decompressing does not scale well and is generally slower then a Ryzen 5950x.
Blender, Cinebench and a 3d particle benchmark shows results within margin of error (less then 1%)
They test games with a GTX1080 at 720P, I am going to ignore that result.
Techspot shows 4% difference in work related things between DDR4 3600 cl16 and DDR5 6000 cl36
Blender and Cinebench is still less then 1%.
I am going to ignore 720p game test results.
between DDR4 3600 cl16 and DDR5 6000 cl36
1080p
Battlefield V +7 FPS
Borderlands 3 no difference
CS GO +4 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077 +1 FPS
Doom Ethernal -4 FPS
Farcry 5 -1 FPS
Metro exodos no difference
Red dead 2 +7 FPS
Shadow of the tomb raider +1 FPS
1440P
Red dead 2 +6 FPS
The other games from the 1080P list are within margin of error (less then 1 FPS)
4k
Red dead 2 +4 FPS
The other games from the 1080P list are within margin of error (less then 1 FPS)
https://www.purepc.pl/test-pamieci-ram-ddr5-g-skill-trident-z5-rgb-6000-mhz-cl36-z-procesorem-intel-core-i9-12900k-najszybsza-kombinacja-na-swiecie?page=0,24
1080p in cpu intensive parts of games.
5400 c38 to 6400 c36 is under 10%,around 6-7% most likely.
a 3800 c15 kit will match or outperform a 5200/5400 c38 one
you need at least ddr5 6000 to see any difference
in general, 12600kf+ddr4 is a better pairing than 12400f+ddr5
best value: F-sku with fast ddr4
balanced option: K-sku with fast ddr4
best performance: K-sku with ddr5 over 6000MHz
.... and purchased. Thanks to the person who identified them as Hynix - My Samsung DDR5 6000s were holding me back. As for the welfare recipients who think DRR4 is even close to what DDR5 offers even in this early stage - well - don't forget to pick up your government cheese.
yeah keep telling that to yourself,it'll make the ddr5 system run even faster.
Do you have an example of things that scale well?
Anandtech shows very bad scaling with Mem speed.
Winrar is 10% boost when compressing, from 4800 CL36 to 6400 CL36 (Good but expensive boost). Decompressing does not scale well and is generally slower then a Ryzen 5950x.
Blender, Cinebench and a 3d particle benchmark shows results within margin of error (less then 1%)
They test games with a GTX1080 at 720P, I am going to ignore that result.
Techspot shows 4% difference in work related things between DDR4 3600 cl16 and DDR5 6000 cl36
Blender and Cinebench is still less then 1%.
I am going to ignore 720p game test results.
between DDR4 3600 cl16 and DDR5 6000 cl36
1080p
Battlefield V +7 FPS
Borderlands 3 no difference
CS GO +4 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077 +1 FPS
Doom Ethernal -4 FPS
Farcry 5 -1 FPS
Metro exodos no difference
Red dead 2 +7 FPS
Shadow of the tomb raider +1 FPS
1440P
Red dead 2 +6 FPS
The other games from the 1080P list are within margin of error (less then 1 FPS)
4k
Red dead 2 +4 FPS
The other games from the 1080P list are within margin of error (less then 1 FPS)
https://www.purepc.pl/test-pamieci-ram-ddr5-g-skill-trident-z5-rgb-6000-mhz-cl36-z-procesorem-intel-core-i9-12900k-najszybsza-kombinacja-na-swiecie?page=0,24
1080p in cpu intensive parts of games.
5400 c38 to 6400 c36 is under 10%,around 6-7% most likely.
a 3800 c15 kit will match or outperform a 5200/5400 c38 one
you need at least ddr5 6000 to see any difference
in general, 12600kf+ddr4 is a better pairing than 12400f+ddr5
best value: F-sku with fast ddr4
balanced option: K-sku with fast ddr4
best performance: K-sku with ddr5 over 6000MHz
.... and purchased. Thanks to the person who identified them as Hynix - My Samsung DDR5 6000s were holding me back. As for the welfare recipients who think DRR4 is even close to what DDR5 offers even in this early stage - well - don't forget to pick up your government cheese.
yeah keep telling that to yourself,it'll make the ddr5 system run even faster.
MegaFalloutFan
Senior Member
Posts: 1029
Joined: 2015-06-27
Senior Member
Posts: 1029
Joined: 2015-06-27
#5988144 Posted on: 01/30/2022 07:05 AM
Do you have an example of things that scale well?
Anandtech shows very bad scaling with Mem speed.
Winrar is 10% boost when compressing, from 4800 CL36 to 6400 CL36 (Good but expensive boost). Decompressing does not scale well and is generally slower then a Ryzen 5950x.
Blender, Cinebench and a 3d particle benchmark shows results within margin of error (less then 1%)
They test games with a GTX1080 at 720P, I am going to ignore that result.
Techspot shows 4% difference in work related things between DDR4 3600 cl16 and DDR5 6000 cl36
Blender and Cinebench is still less then 1%.
I am going to ignore 720p game test results.
between DDR4 3600 cl16 and DDR5 6000 cl36
1080p
Battlefield V +7 FPS
Borderlands 3 no difference
CS GO +4 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077 +1 FPS
Doom Ethernal -4 FPS
Farcry 5 -1 FPS
Metro exodos no difference
Red dead 2 +7 FPS
Shadow of the tomb raider +1 FPS
1440P
Red dead 2 +6 FPS
The other games from the 1080P list are within margin of error (less then 1 FPS)
4k
Red dead 2 +4 FPS
The other games from the 1080P list are within margin of error (less then 1 FPS)
Thats the whole point, you only see the benefit of DDR5 when you go high, we are not there yet, it has to go faster, but at least we can see that it helps
overclockers has XPG Lancer review and FarCry 6 gained 5-6fps from OC to 5600
F1 gained 4fps from 4800 to 5600
The AIDA RAM speed benchmarks show fast read, write and copy, yeah its just numbers but its faster
Do you have an example of things that scale well?
Anandtech shows very bad scaling with Mem speed.
Winrar is 10% boost when compressing, from 4800 CL36 to 6400 CL36 (Good but expensive boost). Decompressing does not scale well and is generally slower then a Ryzen 5950x.
Blender, Cinebench and a 3d particle benchmark shows results within margin of error (less then 1%)
They test games with a GTX1080 at 720P, I am going to ignore that result.
Techspot shows 4% difference in work related things between DDR4 3600 cl16 and DDR5 6000 cl36
Blender and Cinebench is still less then 1%.
I am going to ignore 720p game test results.
between DDR4 3600 cl16 and DDR5 6000 cl36
1080p
Battlefield V +7 FPS
Borderlands 3 no difference
CS GO +4 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077 +1 FPS
Doom Ethernal -4 FPS
Farcry 5 -1 FPS
Metro exodos no difference
Red dead 2 +7 FPS
Shadow of the tomb raider +1 FPS
1440P
Red dead 2 +6 FPS
The other games from the 1080P list are within margin of error (less then 1 FPS)
4k
Red dead 2 +4 FPS
The other games from the 1080P list are within margin of error (less then 1 FPS)
Thats the whole point, you only see the benefit of DDR5 when you go high, we are not there yet, it has to go faster, but at least we can see that it helps
overclockers has XPG Lancer review and FarCry 6 gained 5-6fps from OC to 5600
F1 gained 4fps from 4800 to 5600
The AIDA RAM speed benchmarks show fast read, write and copy, yeah its just numbers but its faster
Adnan008
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2020-06-06
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2020-06-06
#5988171 Posted on: 01/30/2022 11:41 AM
ddr5 6400 mhz cl32 latency is basically same as ddr4 3200mhz cl16 latency, very good indeed
ddr5 6400 mhz cl32 latency is basically same as ddr4 3200mhz cl16 latency, very good indeed
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 8220
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 8220
Joined: 2020-08-03
#5988177 Posted on: 01/30/2022 12:41 PM
it's faster,at least 10%.probably 15%
it would take 4000 c16 to get close to 6400 c32,as long as you run them in gear1 of course
where did you see them the same ?
ddr5 6400 mhz cl32 latency is basically same as ddr4 3200mhz cl16 latency, very good indeed
it's faster,at least 10%.probably 15%
it would take 4000 c16 to get close to 6400 c32,as long as you run them in gear1 of course
where did you see them the same ?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 81
Joined: 2006-04-12
.... and purchased. Thanks to the person who identified them as Hynix - My Samsung DDR5 6000s were holding me back. As for the welfare recipients who think DRR4 is even close to what DDR5 offers even in this early stage - well - don't forget to pick up your government cheese.