Haswell versus Ivy Bridge clock for clock performance
The rumor mill already indicated that the upcoming Haswell processors from Intel would not offer a massive gain in performance based on the architecture when you look at it clock-for-clock opposed to the current generation Ivy bridge processors. A Russian website called OClab however was able to test an engineering sample of quad-core Intel Haswell processor clocked at 2.80GHz. The chip was tested with SuperPi 1M&32M, PiFast, wPrime 32M&1024M at at unknown platform whilst running Microsoft Windows 7 64-bit operating system. The obtained benchmark results could be very dodgy of course.
The Haswell architecture seems actually to be slightly slower than Ivy Bridge on the same clock-speed in single-threaded SuperPi 1M. Interesting is that it is faster (11 minutes 27.505 seconds) compared to its Ivi bridge (11 minutes 49.094 seconds) in the long run SuperPi 32M.
In the threaded PiFast benchmark Intel Haswell (24.01 seconds) reportedly again managed to leave Ivy Bridge (25.5 seconds) behind while operating at the same clock-speed of 2.80GHz. In wPrime 32M the Haswell chip showed better (13.86 seconds) results than the down-clocked Ivy Bridge chip (13.97 seconds); the results in longer wPrime 1024M benchmark were predictable: Haswell chip managed to finish the job in 431.171 seconds, less than a second faster than the Core i7-3770K at 2.8GHz.
Not exactly massive differences alright. Obviously we do not know the final clock frequencies and turbo modes 100% just yet, to the final performance numbers will look completely different from clock-for-clock ones.
Via Xbitlabs via oclab.ru:
Intel to announce Haswell processors at Computex 2013 - 01/21/2013 06:50 PM
Intel is set to host a conference prior to Computex 2013 in June announcing its upcoming Haswell series processors jointly with downstream partners, according to sources from PC players reports DigiTi...
More Intel Haswell processor model numbers surface - 12/31/2012 02:59 PM
The guys and gals at Arctic cooling must have a had a whoops moment as they accidentally leaked a bunch of processor model numbers of Intel's upcoming Haswell-based LGA1150 processors. The list belo...
Launch Of Intel Haswell Reportedly Delayed Till June - 12/28/2012 10:21 AM
More Haswell news today. ‘Haswell’ is the name of Intel’s next-generation processors as you guys know by now. Last week we already we reported some of the key details of...
Intel Haswell to Include Integrated Voltage Regulator - 12/28/2012 10:18 AM
Intel Corp.’s next-generation code-named Haswell microprocessors will feature a secret weapon: integrated voltage regulator module (VRM). The latter will allow to improve granularity of powe...
More Intel Haswell Core i7 laptop CPU specifications leak - 12/20/2012 10:57 AM
Last week we already showed you a detailed presentation slide on upcoming Haswell processors, today more another slide has leaked. The Chinese version of VR Zone scored another exclusive, this time t...
Senior Member
Posts: 7264
Joined: 2008-03-06
Idk,only reason i might consider to upgrade is power consumption.
Senior Member
Posts: 3122
Joined: 2008-01-06
Can see me running my 3570K for at least 2-3 years, I'll probably upgrade my rig with either Broadwell or Skylake
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Joined: 2010-11-10
Give me more of a reason Intel, maybe you should get in touch with some game devs and teach them that it's Ok to use all the cores tucked away in your cpus, and that its not going to cause the universe to cave in on itself.
Senior Member
Posts: 13599
Joined: 2005-08-13
No need to upgrade to this. I might skip Haswell and its die shrink.