Fractal Design Focus 2 chassis review
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
GTA 6 will have amazing graphics ahead of their time thanks to Rage Game Engine 9
According to a recent revelation from Chris Klippel, an industry insider and the creator of Rockstar Magazine and Naughty Dog, the next incarnation of the Grand Theft Auto franchise, GTA 6 might be absolutely great.
What is remarkable is Chris's remark that we are looking at an engine that is ahead of its time, which sounds fantastic. This means that GTA 6 may have better visuals than any other game this generation, which would be quite an achievement.
"The new version of the Rockstar Games graphics engine (RAGE9) that will be used for GTA 6 will be incredible," Chris Klippel begins in the tweet, adding: "I have been able to get very positive feedback, we really should not worry about this aspect" . In addition, the insider has defined this new version of the engine as a completely innovative tool: " We are talking about an engine ahead of its time."
On the other hand, if we look at Rockstar's past and bring out some Remasters, and put on Red Dead Redemption 2 or Grand Theft Auto V, we're confident it'll be quite great, to say the least. Rockstar is noted for these accomplishments, exceeding quality standards and serving as a model for the video game industry. On the other hand, consider the release of GTA 5, which was unquestionably one of the most appealing games on all platforms. Rockstar's efforts appear even better when you consider it's a large open world. In fact, over a decade after its debut, GTA 5 looks better than other newly released open world games. Furthermore, Rockstar has managed to improve the previously optimized.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 4808
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 4808
Joined: 2008-09-07
#6012180 Posted on: 04/25/2022 09:53 PM
Well...I think you are wrong, but, let me offer a branch of the olive tree I planted some years ago.
DX12U and it's use of mesh shaders is really changing game engines, and you are partially right as these render paths can be used by any developer worth their salt.
So...I guess what you are possibly saying is something along the lines of "UE5 mealy uses the same render paths which are available to anyone and so visually would not be any better or worse than anything anyone else can create".
Which is stating the obvious.
That being said, I do think that one of the greatest pieces of coding ever done is GTAV for the XB360 and the PS3, because, the difference graphically between GTAIV and GTAV is astonishing for those two platforms, and I really do think that game looks incredible and was a real swan-song for those platforms. For realises, credit where it is due and I would be the biggest idiot to state R* is someone you should ignore.
I do think, however - unless they switch out their insistence on using PBR and not paying attention to the glancing angles and having the base color of all metal to be white, instead of the color of the metal is where they will run into the same problems they ran into for RDR2, because grass is not white when the sun hits it.
UE5 is powerful, not because of Epic Games, but because of two simple things: the massive community fixing the bugs, and, the SDK's from Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD & every third party pipeline tool on the planet, like autodesk, adobe, foundry etc.
LMAO this UE5 fanboyism based on a couple of tech demos (with very limited scope and terrible performance). No actual UE5 games shipped yet. UE is known for terrible shader stuttering on PC. Yeah, can't share the same optimism as other posters here. UE graphics also don't age very well. GTA5 still looks great and how many years has it been? If you take UE engine game from the same period of time it looks so dated now. And this isn't even talking about RDR2, which no UE game can even come close to in visuals complexity and scale.
Well...I think you are wrong, but, let me offer a branch of the olive tree I planted some years ago.
DX12U and it's use of mesh shaders is really changing game engines, and you are partially right as these render paths can be used by any developer worth their salt.
So...I guess what you are possibly saying is something along the lines of "UE5 mealy uses the same render paths which are available to anyone and so visually would not be any better or worse than anything anyone else can create".
Which is stating the obvious.
That being said, I do think that one of the greatest pieces of coding ever done is GTAV for the XB360 and the PS3, because, the difference graphically between GTAIV and GTAV is astonishing for those two platforms, and I really do think that game looks incredible and was a real swan-song for those platforms. For realises, credit where it is due and I would be the biggest idiot to state R* is someone you should ignore.
I do think, however - unless they switch out their insistence on using PBR and not paying attention to the glancing angles and having the base color of all metal to be white, instead of the color of the metal is where they will run into the same problems they ran into for RDR2, because grass is not white when the sun hits it.
UE5 is powerful, not because of Epic Games, but because of two simple things: the massive community fixing the bugs, and, the SDK's from Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD & every third party pipeline tool on the planet, like autodesk, adobe, foundry etc.
Ghosty
Senior Member
Posts: 6879
Joined: 2003-07-23
Senior Member
Posts: 6879
Joined: 2003-07-23
#6012181 Posted on: 04/25/2022 10:00 PM
Well...I think you are wrong, but, let me offer a branch of the olive tree I planted some years ago.
DX12U and it's use of mesh shaders is really changing game engines, and you are partially right as these render paths can be used by any developer worth their salt.
So...I guess what you are possibly saying is something along the lines of "UE5 mealy uses the same render paths which are available to anyone and so visually would not be any better or worse than anything anyone else can create".
Which is stating the obvious.
That being said, I do think that one of the greatest pieces of coding ever done is GTAV for the XB360 and the PS3, because, the difference graphically between GTAIV and GTAV is astonishing for those two platforms, and I really do think that game looks incredible and was a real swan-song for those platforms. For realises, credit where it is due and I would be the biggest idiot to state R* is someone you should ignore.
I do think, however - unless they switch out their insistence on using PBR and not paying attention to the glancing angles and having the base color of all metal to be white, instead of the color of the metal is where they will run into the same problems they ran into for RDR2, because grass is not white when the sun hits it.
UE5 is powerful, not because of Epic Games, but because of two simple things: the massive community fixing the bugs, and, the SDK's from Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD & every third party pipeline tool on the planet, like autodesk, adobe, foundry etc.
It all depends on the game. UE5 is excellent for mobile development because it saves a lot of time, not least because of the small form factor. Bigger games might or might not be beneficial to be custom engine made. Time saved can be served in other areas that sometime get overlocked during development because of time constraints.
Well...I think you are wrong, but, let me offer a branch of the olive tree I planted some years ago.
DX12U and it's use of mesh shaders is really changing game engines, and you are partially right as these render paths can be used by any developer worth their salt.
So...I guess what you are possibly saying is something along the lines of "UE5 mealy uses the same render paths which are available to anyone and so visually would not be any better or worse than anything anyone else can create".
Which is stating the obvious.
That being said, I do think that one of the greatest pieces of coding ever done is GTAV for the XB360 and the PS3, because, the difference graphically between GTAIV and GTAV is astonishing for those two platforms, and I really do think that game looks incredible and was a real swan-song for those platforms. For realises, credit where it is due and I would be the biggest idiot to state R* is someone you should ignore.
I do think, however - unless they switch out their insistence on using PBR and not paying attention to the glancing angles and having the base color of all metal to be white, instead of the color of the metal is where they will run into the same problems they ran into for RDR2, because grass is not white when the sun hits it.
UE5 is powerful, not because of Epic Games, but because of two simple things: the massive community fixing the bugs, and, the SDK's from Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD & every third party pipeline tool on the planet, like autodesk, adobe, foundry etc.
It all depends on the game. UE5 is excellent for mobile development because it saves a lot of time, not least because of the small form factor. Bigger games might or might not be beneficial to be custom engine made. Time saved can be served in other areas that sometime get overlocked during development because of time constraints.
asturur
Senior Member
Posts: 1225
Joined: 2010-05-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1225
Joined: 2010-05-12
#6012182 Posted on: 04/25/2022 10:01 PM
is ahead of its time like any other game in the works now, but released in 2024.
is ahead of its time like any other game in the works now, but released in 2024.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 4808
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 4808
Joined: 2008-09-07
#6012185 Posted on: 04/25/2022 10:13 PM
True, but I was trying to keep it on topic with R*
It all depends on the game. UE5 is excellent for mobile development because it saves a lot of time, not least because of the small form factor. Bigger games might or might not be beneficial to be custom engine made. Time saved can be served in other areas that sometime get overlocked during development because of time constraints.
True, but I was trying to keep it on topic with R*
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6879
Joined: 2003-07-23