GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX White review
Cougar Terminator gaming chair review
G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
GeForce RTX 4090 running at 3.0 GHz and 616 Watt running GPU stress tool
NVIDIA's latest flagship GPU is 3.0 GHz, MSI's Kombustor GPU stress tool used. The RTX 4090 can run at very high clocks with NVIDIA's new Ada Lovelace architecture. NVIDIA has shown already the card can run at 2.85 GHz with factory settings.
Gamers and overclockers can reach 3.0 GHz with Kombustor. The RTX 4090 can operate at 3.0 GHz / 615.8W or at defaults 425.6W / 2.64 GHz, according to Bilibili screenshots.
The Leaker reported only GPU temperature and memory hot spots were missing. GeForce RTX 4090 has a 450W TDP. Most custom models are similar. Most cards have "OC" or "Gaming" modes with TDPs above 500W. Founder Edition GPUs have a power limit of 600W, which may explain why this test used a 600W card.
Assumed NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB 3DMark performance benchmarks leaked - 10/06/2022 09:22 AM
While we're unsure how anyone can measure 3Dmark on an unreleased card ( NVIDIA does not deliver full drivers even to board partners), some numbers are up....
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founder Edition and + AIB Custom Design Unboxing photos - 10/05/2022 03:15 PM
Today we can show some unboxing goodness, next week NVIDIA will lift the GeFroce RTX 4090 embargo. Many 4090 graphics card are arriving still, in the below snippet a few photos of what NVIDIA and the ...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 tested in benchmark; 60% faster than RTX 3090 Ti - 10/02/2022 10:43 AM
In regular tests, we do not know how much quicker the RTX 4090 can be than the RTX 3090 Ti. As it turns out, the card was previously evaluated with the Geekbench CUDA benchmark, with the GPU scoring a...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Starts Listing stock in Europe, priced at 1999 to 2549 EUR - 09/30/2022 02:53 PM
GeForce RTX 4090 is listing at Europe based retailer, Proshop. The shop has more models available than the American colleagues at Newegg....
GeForce RTX 4090 is listing at Newegg for 1,599 up to $1,999. - 09/30/2022 08:56 AM
Nvidia's top-of-the-line GeForce RTX 4090 graphics cards on October 12, U.S. retailers are listing custom GeForce RTX 4090 24GB graphics boards from Nvidia's partners. Some RTX 4090 products cost $1...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 7255
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7255
Joined: 2012-11-10
#6058344 Posted on: 10/07/2022 03:12 PM
I love this idea/concept.
For me, Intel AMD and Nvidia should sit together and agree on maximum thermals values that could be used by their CPUs and GPUs.
And if anyone breached that values, that would have to pay a penalty to the others, if they managed to say within the agreed values.
I know this is almost impossible to happen, but it would be really good.
@Ven0m I thought it was the Japanese government that was cracking down on them? That's why kei vehicles are so weird, because the restrictions were put on by the government and manufacturers tried to make the most of those restrictions. The Subaru Sambar is possibly the best example of this.
In any case, the biggest difference here is that those car manufacturers made pretty much everything in their cars. AMD and Nvidia pretty much just make the chips themselves but none of the rest of the PC. They have no incentive to agree upon such things. The market determines the demand and being a duopoloy, one of them just has to be only slightly better than the other (Nvidia has a better overall platform, AMD has better prices) and if you don't like it then that sucks for you. PSU and motherboard manufacturers aren't going to care because it just helps drive sales of more valuable components. OEMs are probably thrilled about it because by cheaping out on cooling, the parts will surely prematurely die, which means people will be forced to buy upgrades/replacements sooner.
So, I think a large government will have to step in, and basically tax the AIB manufacturer for making components that exceed a certain performance-per-watt. Since the AIB partners have razor thin margins, any additional costs would incentivize them to either optimize or otherwise lower the performance of the GPU. Since the chip manufacturer doesn't want to see their stats lower, they are then incentivized to make chips more efficient.
I love this idea/concept.
For me, Intel AMD and Nvidia should sit together and agree on maximum thermals values that could be used by their CPUs and GPUs.
And if anyone breached that values, that would have to pay a penalty to the others, if they managed to say within the agreed values.
I know this is almost impossible to happen, but it would be really good.
@Ven0m I thought it was the Japanese government that was cracking down on them? That's why kei vehicles are so weird, because the restrictions were put on by the government and manufacturers tried to make the most of those restrictions. The Subaru Sambar is possibly the best example of this.
In any case, the biggest difference here is that those car manufacturers made pretty much everything in their cars. AMD and Nvidia pretty much just make the chips themselves but none of the rest of the PC. They have no incentive to agree upon such things. The market determines the demand and being a duopoloy, one of them just has to be only slightly better than the other (Nvidia has a better overall platform, AMD has better prices) and if you don't like it then that sucks for you. PSU and motherboard manufacturers aren't going to care because it just helps drive sales of more valuable components. OEMs are probably thrilled about it because by cheaping out on cooling, the parts will surely prematurely die, which means people will be forced to buy upgrades/replacements sooner.
So, I think a large government will have to step in, and basically tax the AIB manufacturer for making components that exceed a certain performance-per-watt. Since the AIB partners have razor thin margins, any additional costs would incentivize them to either optimize or otherwise lower the performance of the GPU. Since the chip manufacturer doesn't want to see their stats lower, they are then incentivized to make chips more efficient.
MonstroMart
Senior Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: 2006-07-06
Senior Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: 2006-07-06
#6058350 Posted on: 10/07/2022 03:33 PM
More power
But sir...
I said. More POWER.
Did you see what you did sir f**k this s**t I'm out
Anatoli Diatlov: More power
Random Comrade: But sir...
Anatoli Diatlov: I said. More POWER.
More power
But sir...
I said. More POWER.
Did you see what you did sir f**k this s**t I'm out
Anatoli Diatlov: More power
Random Comrade: But sir...
Anatoli Diatlov: I said. More POWER.
southamptonfc
Senior Member
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2006-04-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2006-04-10
#6058357 Posted on: 10/07/2022 03:44 PM
@ 600W it's not just a GPU stress tool. It's also testing PSU, case, case fans, CPU cooler etc etc
@ 600W it's not just a GPU stress tool. It's also testing PSU, case, case fans, CPU cooler etc etc
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 7255
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7255
Joined: 2012-11-10
#6058359 Posted on: 10/07/2022 03:51 PM
It also tests your circuit breaker (you have to account for the whole PC, the input wattage, and other devices connected to the same breaker), your air conditioning performance, and your wife's patience with electric bills and fan noise.
@ 600W it's not just a GPU stress tool. It's also testing PSU, case, case fans, CPU cooler etc etc
It also tests your circuit breaker (you have to account for the whole PC, the input wattage, and other devices connected to the same breaker), your air conditioning performance, and your wife's patience with electric bills and fan noise.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4606
Joined: 2009-09-08
I love this idea/concept.
For me, Intel AMD and Nvidia should sit together and agree on maximum thermals values that could be used by their CPUs and GPUs.
And if anyone breached that values, that would have to pay a penalty to the others, if they managed to say within the agreed values.
I know this is almost impossible to happen, but it would be really good.