Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Spotted in FF XV Benchmark - 8% faster
The upcoming week you'll see the GeForce RTX 2080 Super being launched. The graphics cards have a notch more shader processors and new faster GDD6 memory. One of the cards already was spotted in the Final Fantasy XV benchmark.
A benchmark result has appeared in the online database of the game. The Final Fantasy XV benchmark database shows a score of 8663. That is about 8% more than what the regular 2080 can achieve, but with a 14% higher result, the 2080 Ti is still always the leading the pack. The GeForce RTX 2080 Super will be priced at 699 USD for the founder edition, that's a hundred bucks cheaper than the original RTX 2080 at launch. Keep an eye out at Guru3D at the 23rd, as we'll have some reviews ready.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 TI SUPER is not going to happen soon (if at all) - 07/16/2019 05:03 PM
A number of websites are creating chatter and noise on the web about a possible GeForce RTX 2080 Ti SUPER, in specific that it might not be released. The rumors started during the announcements of the...
Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Strix - 07/12/2019 02:24 PM
It is a bit of an exclusive, as we've been promised to have the one single media sample of the STRIX in the entire EU. Yes, we review the ASUS GeForce RTX 2060 Strix, NVIDIA has launched graphics car...
Download: NVIDIA GeForce 431.36 WHQL driver - 07/09/2019 03:46 PM
NVIDIA just released GeForce 431.36 WHQL drivers for download. This release adds support the new GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER as well as offering a number of fixes. Download...
Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X TRIO - 07/09/2019 03:02 PM
We review the MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X TRIO, NVIDIA has launched graphics cards in their new Super series, as in super-charged. GeForce RTX 2070 Super, of course, is based on a Turing TU104...
Review: Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER JetStream - 07/09/2019 03:01 PM
We review the Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER JetStream. Now based on a Turing TU104 chip NVIDIA has launched this graphics cards with a Super tag, as in super-charged. Palit beefed up that GFPU with a h...
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5693274 Posted on: 07/22/2019 02:51 PM
Bollocks
.
I should clarify. You can probably even find some 1080p game where even a Titan RTX cant technically max out "everything" (if the user insists of trolling himself and others) with gratuitous settings like MSAA x8, full RTX on, HBAO+ at 144 fps, etc, without addressing what is the most visually appealing aspect of a game graphically. And the single most visually appealing aspect of ANY game lies in increased resolution, period. Above all else! Even if you have to bring down some other settings (usually inconsequential, ie, motion blur, level of shadows, type and degree of AA esp at 4k, etc). But increased res doesnt do much if you are stuck on a small screen, ie, 24".
With a proper size screen, increase in res MORE than makes up for whatever settings you may have to bring down, and again, usually involving settings that hardly make any visual difference at all. If you max out everything at 1080p on a small screen, it will still pale in comparison to something not maxed out at 4k (on larger screen). You may not care about visuals and just want to be competitive at 144 fps in a fast paced game, but thats another thing altogether. Gamers have different priorities. Some have more fun with CSGO and Quake at 144fps and dont care about crappy visuals, while others prefer more visually appealing, slower paced games even if at lower FPS.
I played same build of SOTR like you in 1080p 144hz all maxed - Paititi map and performance was pretty bad and it was on 2080 also.They really need to do some GPU performance improvement for new games if you dont want to play Quake 2 rtx on it.
Bollocks
.I should clarify. You can probably even find some 1080p game where even a Titan RTX cant technically max out "everything" (if the user insists of trolling himself and others) with gratuitous settings like MSAA x8, full RTX on, HBAO+ at 144 fps, etc, without addressing what is the most visually appealing aspect of a game graphically. And the single most visually appealing aspect of ANY game lies in increased resolution, period. Above all else! Even if you have to bring down some other settings (usually inconsequential, ie, motion blur, level of shadows, type and degree of AA esp at 4k, etc). But increased res doesnt do much if you are stuck on a small screen, ie, 24".
With a proper size screen, increase in res MORE than makes up for whatever settings you may have to bring down, and again, usually involving settings that hardly make any visual difference at all. If you max out everything at 1080p on a small screen, it will still pale in comparison to something not maxed out at 4k (on larger screen). You may not care about visuals and just want to be competitive at 144 fps in a fast paced game, but thats another thing altogether. Gamers have different priorities. Some have more fun with CSGO and Quake at 144fps and dont care about crappy visuals, while others prefer more visually appealing, slower paced games even if at lower FPS.
I played same build of SOTR like you in 1080p 144hz all maxed - Paititi map and performance was pretty bad and it was on 2080 also.They really need to do some GPU performance improvement for new games if you dont want to play Quake 2 rtx on it.
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5693279 Posted on: 07/22/2019 02:58 PM
8% increase in performance is now considered news worthy.
This is the most pathetic state of gpus I have seen to date.
Ye dat is really super state.
8% increase in performance is now considered news worthy.
This is the most pathetic state of gpus I have seen to date.
Ye dat is really super state.
mohiuddin
Senior Member
Posts: 914
Joined: 2010-11-06
Senior Member
Posts: 914
Joined: 2010-11-06
#5693281 Posted on: 07/22/2019 03:00 PM
Super stagnant state. :p
Ye dat is really super state.
Super stagnant state. :p
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5693285 Posted on: 07/22/2019 03:12 PM
I wonder how much NV will take for new 30 series GPUs and if they will be on 7nm.
Super stagnant state. :p
I wonder how much NV will take for new 30 series GPUs and if they will be on 7nm.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11248
Joined: 2004-05-10
Bollocks
I should clarify. You can probably even find some 1080p game where even a Titan RTX cant technically max out "everything" (if the user insists of trolling himself and others) with ridiculous settings like MSAA x8, full RTX on, HBAO+ at 144 fps, etc, without addressing what is the most visually appealing aspect of a game graphically. And the single most visually appealing aspect of ANY game lies in increased resolution, period. Above all else! Even if you have to bring down some other settings (usually inconsequential, ie, motion blur, level of shadows, type and degree of AA esp at 4k, etc). But increased res doesnt do much if you are stuck on a small screen, ie, 24".
With a proper size screen, increase in res MORE than makes up for whatever settings you may have to bring down, and again, usually involving settings that hardly make any visual difference at all. If you max out everything at 1080p on a small screen, it will still pale in comparison to something not maxed out at 4k (on larger screen). You may not care about visuals and just want to be competitive at 144 fps in a fast paced game, but thats another thing altogether. Gamers have different priorities. Some have more fun with CSGO and Quake at 144fps and dont care about crappy visuals, while others prefer more visually appealing, slower paced games even if at lower FPS.