ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
GeForce MX330 and MX350 leaks: Reused MX250 and GTX 1050 (updated)
Specs of the upcoming entry-level mobile GPUs, the MX330 and MX350, have leaked. The hardware IDs are indicating a Pascal release, and that means this release is a refresh.
Nvidia will be using the very same chip for MX330 as for the MX250 based on the MX250 and GTX 1050. Even the clock frequencies are nearly identical. The MX330 would be a respin, the GP107 GPU of the GTX 1050 will empower the MX350, with ine change, a memory bus sliced in two now making it 64 bits wide. Two leaked benchmarks, 3DMark Time Spy and Fire Strike, show that the MX350 is performing at GTX 960M and GTX 1050 (laptop variant) level.
Updated: the SKUs now are listed at NVIDIA.
- https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/gaming-laptops/mx-350/
- https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/gaming-laptops/mx-330/
Specs | NVIDIA MX330 | NVIDIA MX350 |
GPU | N17S-G3-A1 |
N17S-G5 |
Internal Part Number | GP108-655-A1 | GP107-670-A1 |
Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Package | GB2C-64 | GB2D-64 |
Package Size | 23 x 23 mm | 23 x 23 mm |
BGA | 595-ball | 595-ball (?) |
PCI Express | Gen3 x4 | Gen3 x4 |
GPU Base Clock | 1531 MHz | 1354 |
GPU Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | 1468 |
CUDA Cores | 384 | 640 |
TDP | 25W | 25W |
Memory Type |
64-bit GDDR5 256Mx32 / 512Mx16 |
64-bit GDDR5 256Mx32 / 512Mx16 |
P0 Memory Clock | 3.5 / 3.0 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Display Port | N/A | N/A |
HDMI | N/A | N/A |
Launch Date | Feb 10, 2020 | Feb 10, 2020 |
« ViewSonic Launches VG2456 24-inch Docking Monitor for Workspaces · GeForce MX330 and MX350 leaks: Reused MX250 and GTX 1050 (updated)
· Intel slide of future GPU shows it could use 400 to 500 watts with 4 'stacked' chiplets »
Palit releases a Passively Cooled GeForce GTX1650 KalmX - 02/07/2020 09:35 AM
Palit releases a new line called KalmX in the GeForce GTX 1650 series. The card does not have any fans, and this has a passive cooler combined with Turing architecture, Palit GeForce GTX 1650 KalmX ...
Review: Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GamingPRO - 02/05/2020 01:17 PM
Palit outs a new revision GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, the GamingPRO OC version now has been fitted with a triple-fan cooler and fast 15.5 Gbps GDDR6 memory. The GP from Palit. is the super edition, that h...
NVIDIA Takes GeForce NOW out of Beta - available with a free limited version - 02/05/2020 09:54 AM
GeForce NOW game stream service from beta. There is a free variant with play sessions of a maximum of one hour and a paid variant without limits, which temporarily costs 5.49 euros per month....
Download: GeForce 442.19 WHQL drivers - 02/03/2020 05:10 PM
NVIDIA just released GeForce 442.19 WHQL drivers, the driver delivers day-one support for Zombie Army: Dead War 4, Apex Legends: Season 4 and Metro Exodus: Sam’s Story, and adds support for three n...
ASUS Outs GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER STRIX in a Snow White edition - 02/03/2020 09:59 AM
Hmm yeah, just no? It's not very appealing and pleasing to the eyes with that black PCB eh? ASUSTeK launches a GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER graphics card "ROG-STRIX-RTX2080S-O8G-WHITE-GAMING"...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 3532
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 3532
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5759272 Posted on: 02/11/2020 01:01 PM
And AMD too, remember those new mobile GPU few year ago that use "legacy" drivers only...
For entry model GPU or you have an APU, IGP or you get a "powerfull" old gen GPU to clean the stock.
If entry level, and so few CPU power, i would preffer IGP or APU, to save the battery...
I think the main usage for this is office PCs if you have 2-3 monitor setups e.t.c.
And AMD too, remember those new mobile GPU few year ago that use "legacy" drivers only...
For entry model GPU or you have an APU, IGP or you get a "powerfull" old gen GPU to clean the stock.
If entry level, and so few CPU power, i would preffer IGP or APU, to save the battery...
I think the main usage for this is office PCs if you have 2-3 monitor setups e.t.c.
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 1696
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 1696
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5759274 Posted on: 02/11/2020 01:06 PM
<--- reads this article on a very fine and working Pascal GPU.
If it was Fermi, I would understand such reaction, but Pascal will be good for 2-3 more low-end renames.
<--- reads this article on a very fine and working Pascal GPU.
If it was Fermi, I would understand such reaction, but Pascal will be good for 2-3 more low-end renames.
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 3532
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 3532
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5759275 Posted on: 02/11/2020 01:10 PM
<--- reads this article on a very fine and working Pascal GPU.
If it was Fermi, I would understand such reaction, but Pascal will be good for 2-3 more low-end renames.
You have top-end Pascal, that most definitely won't be used in those. Instead, some bottom of the barrel stock.
<--- reads this article on a very fine and working Pascal GPU.
If it was Fermi, I would understand such reaction, but Pascal will be good for 2-3 more low-end renames.
You have top-end Pascal, that most definitely won't be used in those. Instead, some bottom of the barrel stock.
Nekrosleezer
Senior Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 2006-02-13
Senior Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 2006-02-13
#5759287 Posted on: 02/11/2020 02:07 PM
hahaha i used to have a MX4000 which was a lot worse lol
on topic: i think there is nothing wrong with using pascal which is really good still
The MX name makes me think back to the MX 440 days. Yes, I had one.
hahaha i used to have a MX4000 which was a lot worse lol
on topic: i think there is nothing wrong with using pascal which is really good still
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 158
Joined: 2018-09-18
Why not? Pascal by today's standards is still very efficient and these low-end solutions don't need the Turing features.