Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6650 XT Gaming X review
Deepcool AS500 PLUS CPU Cooler Review

New Downloads
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24
GeForce 512.77 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1960
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.1 WHQL driver download
3DMark Download v2.22.7359 + Time Spy
Prime95 download version 30.8 build 15


New Forum Topics
[3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) AMD could be developing a 24-core Ryzen 9 7950X CPU with a TDP of 170 W. 10700k vs 12700k, worth the upgrade ? GeForce RTX 4090 is twice as fast as RTX 3090 and uses 450W (16128 Shader Cores) NVIDIA GeForce 512.77 WHQL driver download & Discussion Intel Arc desktop graphics cards from Intel are further delayed (could be September at the earliest) Weird colors with old drivers and new one Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. New Upcoming ATI/AMD GPU's Thread: Leaks, Hopes & Aftermarket GPU's AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - Deathloop preview




Guru3D.com » News » GeForce GTX TITAN-X 3DMark Benchmarks Surface

GeForce GTX TITAN-X 3DMark Benchmarks Surface

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/10/2015 06:24 PM | source: | 67 comment(s)
GeForce GTX TITAN-X 3DMark Benchmarks Surface

Okay, BIG grain of salt - but they could be real. Somebody posted a couple of screenshots of Futuremark 3DMark 11 results. That somebody also apparently has four GeForce GTX Titan X graphics cards and published the results online. 

The cards have been tested properly with a Core i7-5960X eight-core processor, and the scores are both single-GPU and 4-way SLI with on 3DMark 11, with its "extreme" (X) preset. The card scored X7994 points in a single GPU run and a whopping X24064 points in 4-way SLI. Again that would be the test in EXTREME mode. The screenshots that leaked through Videocardz confirm the announced 12GB memory partition, but it also is listing a boost core clock of 1222 MHz and a memory clock of 1863 MHz (x4) for the Quad SLI setup. We do assume here that the card would be overclocked or tweaked a little, but these clocks are yummie for an 8 billion transistor encounting product!

Clock wise the single GTX Titan X would be clocked arround 1.0 GHz as the screenshot indicates. The memory is clocked at 1753 Mhz (x4) = 7.0 Ghz effective. And these numbers do make more sense. The GTX Titan X is expected to get 3072 shader processors, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory bus with 12 GB of memory. The majority of specs are based on the GM200 Quadro counter-part. What remains weird though is that the entry is listed as 'Generic VGA', without a driver you simply can not activate SLI or even the single GPU, so it really should state something 'GeForce'.



GeForce GTX TITAN-X 3DMark Benchmarks Surface GeForce GTX TITAN-X 3DMark Benchmarks Surface




« Mushkin ECO2 Line of Solid State Drives · GeForce GTX TITAN-X 3DMark Benchmarks Surface · ASUS Launches STRIX-GTX960-DC2OC-4GD5 »

Related Stories

New Photos of GeForce GTX Titan X - 03/08/2015 10:14 AM
We've already shown you a good bunch of photo's on Nvidia's latest and greatest, the GeForce GTX Titan X, here.  But some new photo's surfaced and you really do want to take a look at them !...

Gigabyte now offers GeForce GTX 960 in 4GB versions - 03/06/2015 07:41 PM
Gigabyte now offers a GTX 960 available with 4 GB graphics memory. The larger frame buffer can be useful when playing at higher resolutions, or when playing with higher-resolution textures installed...

NVIDIA GeForce TITAN-X Revealed (Updated) - 03/05/2015 07:09 PM
Well kinda, over at the GDC there was a quickie graphics card announcement. The GeForce GTX TITAN-X will be based on Maxwell but with a massive transistor count. It would have a 12GB frame buffer, 3072 Shader processors and 8 billion transistors.

Unreal Engine 4 Kite Demo - Running on GeForce TITAN X - 03/05/2015 09:57 AM
NVIDIA has opened up PhysX Code to UE4 Developers. When you experience the huge, realistic world of our Kite demo running on NVIDIA TITAN X, you see the result of Epic’s longstanding commi...

Download Nvidia GeForce 347.71 driver - 02/27/2015 07:50 PM
You can now download the Nvidia GeForce 347.71 driver. This is a GeForce Hot Fix driver. More details on the download page. Download here...


14 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


holystarlight
Senior Member



Posts: 791
Joined: 2007-10-14

#5026611 Posted on: 03/10/2015 09:54 PM
and... what you are going to buy it?


depends, if it overclocks well, and hopefully there will be some custom designs of the card, I really don't like reference design always had bad experience when it comes to overclocking, and ofc will depend on reviews too.

But even if the 390X is better, I still wouldn't buy an ATI/AMD card, personal preference. but hopefully it will help lower the pricing of the titan x.

Veteran
Senior Member



Posts: 12103
Joined: 2009-01-16

#5026612 Posted on: 03/10/2015 09:54 PM
690 was same price in May 2012, you get a lot of card for your money.

Daftshadow
Senior Member



Posts: 1329
Joined: 2004-07-10

#5026618 Posted on: 03/10/2015 10:01 PM
depends, if it overclocks well, and hopefully there will be some custom designs of the card, I really don't like reference design always had bad experience when it comes to overclocking, and ofc will depend on reviews too.

But even if the 390X is better, I still wouldn't buy an ATI/AMD card, personal preference. but hopefully it will help lower the pricing of the titan x.

for me tbh, i dont really have a preference for either brand or say brand loyalty. as long the card is good and the price is worth it, then i'm buying it regardless of brand. but of course like everyone else, i have my own video card pet-peeves that influences my decision making and the deal breaker such as temperature, power usage, specifications, etc.

if the 290x didnt run so hot and used and/or required so much power, i wouldve gotten that card instead of the 980. for example.

Netherwind
Senior Member



Posts: 7981
Joined: 2009-11-13

#5026623 Posted on: 03/10/2015 10:06 PM
Would 970SLI beat that score? That's all I'm interested in :)

Lane
Senior Member



Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25

#5026627 Posted on: 03/10/2015 10:14 PM
Would 970SLI beat that score? That's all I'm interested in :)


In thoses benchmark, the TitanX ( depending the clockspeed and against what 980 ( G1 or stock ), is around 25-30% faster of a 980 G1 / stock. 3Dmark11 and 2013.. ), let say 30%..

Ofc, this will depend the final clock speed... And if we can trust thoses benchmark..

14 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022