ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
FSP Hydro G Pro 1000W (ATX 3.0, 1000W PSU) review
Addlink S90 Lite 2TB NVMe SSD review
GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 3072 CUDA Cores and 6GB of GDDR5
I have to classify this as a rumor, but the info available sums up to the idea that Nvidia will be releasing a GeForce GTX 980 Ti that has 3072 Shader Cores and 6GB of GDDR5.
That means it will be based on Big-Maxwell aka GM200 that currently resides in the Titan X released last week. If true then this would be an awesome release. 6GB (384-bit) is plenty enough and the GPU more than fast enough. There is one more speculation, the card would be FASTER clocked compared to the Titan X, by 10%.
So if AMD releases something upcoming summer, they know what they can expect from Nvidia. Btw being a non Titan model, board partners should be able to com up with their own designs and factory overclocks as well.
Nvidia | GeForce GTX Titan X | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 960 |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell | Maxwell | Maxwell | Maxwell |
GPU | GM200 | GM200 | GM204 | GM204 | GM206 |
Die Size | 601mm2 | 601mm2 | 398mm2 | 398mm2 | 228mm2 |
Process | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm |
Shader Cores | 3072 | 3072 | 2048 | 1664 | 1024 |
Texture Units | 192 | 192 | 128 | 104 | 64 |
ROPs | 96 | 96 | 64 | 64 | 32 |
Base Clock | 1002 MHz | ~1126 MHz | 1126 MHz | 1051 MHz | 1126 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1089 MHz | ~1216 MHz | 1216 MHz | 1178 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Graphics Memory | 12 GB GDDR5 | 6 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 |
Memory Bus | 384-bit | 384-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 128-bit |
Memory Clock | 7.0 GHz | 7.0 GHz | 7.0 GHz | 7.0 GHz | 7.0 GHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
TDP | 250W | 250W | 165W | 145W | 120W |
Power Connectors | 8+6 Pin | 8+6 Pin | Two 6-Pin | Two 6-Pin | One 6-Pin |
Pricing | $999 US | $699 ? | $549 US | $329 US | $199 US |
« Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results · GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 3072 CUDA Cores and 6GB of GDDR5
· Toshiba Launches 48-Layer BiCS 3D NAND Flash memory »
Palit GeForce GTX 960 JetStream 4 GB - 03/20/2015 10:07 AM
Though a little late to the party, Palit now offers a GeForce GTX 960 JetStream edition with 4 GB of graphics memory. The card not only looks great, it is very silent and shows nice cooling levels u...
MSI Launches its GeForce GTX TITAN X Graphics Card - 03/18/2015 03:28 PM
And one more for today, MSI is pleased to announce the availability of the impressive MSI GeForce GTX TITAN X. The full potential and power of the NVIDIA Maxwell GPU is now available to enthusiasts e...
Review: GeForce GTX Titan X - 03/18/2015 01:05 PM
Join us as we review the fastest graphics card in the world, the GeForce GTX Titan X. The 12 GB beast has arrived. Initially the Titan series was positioned to be a professional line of products, howe...
Palit Launches GeForce GTX TITAN X - 03/18/2015 01:05 PM
Palit releases the newest super-powered graphics card: Palit GeForce GTX TITAN X, and it is the most advanced GPU the world has ever seen. GeForce GTX TITAN X is the ultimate graphics card built for t...
Download GeForce 347.88 WHQL driver - 03/18/2015 09:18 AM
You can now download the GeForce 347.88 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA. In today's Game Ready driver, several Battlefield Hardline performance optimizations are included, in addition to an u...
NuttyProcessor
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2015-02-16
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2015-02-16
#5038875 Posted on: 03/27/2015 10:31 AM
How can this be? As it will be faster than the titan X there will be NO REASON AT ALL to buy the titan X without DP FP64. It was clear a new card would arrive to fill the gap between the titan and the 980, but when its faster than the titan, what card will be placed between the 980 and the titan?
A titan LE Or a GTX980+ with 5/6 of the GM200 chip enabled? Thus: 2560 Shader cores, 160 Texture Units, 80 Rops, 5GB DDR5 on a 320 bits bus?
Now that would make sense! and note this as a prediction.. a card like i describe above will release within 2 months after AMD release, clocks are yet to be determined, nvidia has to watch te competitions HD 300 release first.
How can this be? As it will be faster than the titan X there will be NO REASON AT ALL to buy the titan X without DP FP64. It was clear a new card would arrive to fill the gap between the titan and the 980, but when its faster than the titan, what card will be placed between the 980 and the titan?
A titan LE Or a GTX980+ with 5/6 of the GM200 chip enabled? Thus: 2560 Shader cores, 160 Texture Units, 80 Rops, 5GB DDR5 on a 320 bits bus?
Now that would make sense! and note this as a prediction.. a card like i describe above will release within 2 months after AMD release, clocks are yet to be determined, nvidia has to watch te competitions HD 300 release first.
Relayer
Member
Posts: 48
Joined: 2009-02-10
Member
Posts: 48
Joined: 2009-02-10
#5038878 Posted on: 03/27/2015 10:38 AM
I have to classify this as a rumor, but the facts however point to the fact that Nvidia will be releasing aÂ*GeForce GTX 980 Ti that has 3072 Shader Cores and 6GB of GDDR5....
GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 3072 CUDA Cores and 6GB of GDDR5
What "facts"? I'm not saying this isn't going to happen, but it seems more like deductive reasoning than any facts.
I have to classify this as a rumor, but the facts however point to the fact that Nvidia will be releasing aÂ*GeForce GTX 980 Ti that has 3072 Shader Cores and 6GB of GDDR5....
GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 3072 CUDA Cores and 6GB of GDDR5
What "facts"? I'm not saying this isn't going to happen, but it seems more like deductive reasoning than any facts.
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 989
Joined: 2010-08-24
Senior Member
Posts: 989
Joined: 2010-08-24
#5038882 Posted on: 03/27/2015 10:43 AM
I'll have to say that this is probably not true (no offense to you Hilbert, as you said it's just a rumor).
This is pretty much the same GPU as Titan X, just with less VRAM. Titan X doesn't have the DP performance that other Titans had in order to justify the price point, so if these said rumors were true nobody would buy the Titan X for any reason. Not even future proofing. When we get games to use more than 6GB of VRAM, these GPUs won't be powerful enough anyway.
And the difference in DP between the 980 and the Titan X is not that big. They won't be able to handicap the 980Ti DP performance enough to make Titan X feasible.
My 2 cents. I could be wrong, but I don't see Nvidia completely sabotaging the number of Titan X sells.
EDIT: If I think about it.. If this 980Ti would be around 850-900$ the Titan X would still be feasible. 100$ extra could justify the extra 6GB of VRAM on the Titan X. But 900$ for the 980Ti is above AMD's intended 390x price. It all depends whether the 390x will be competitive since the leaked slides are not accurate (the Titan X performance in those slides was quite off).
I'll have to say that this is probably not true (no offense to you Hilbert, as you said it's just a rumor).
This is pretty much the same GPU as Titan X, just with less VRAM. Titan X doesn't have the DP performance that other Titans had in order to justify the price point, so if these said rumors were true nobody would buy the Titan X for any reason. Not even future proofing. When we get games to use more than 6GB of VRAM, these GPUs won't be powerful enough anyway.
And the difference in DP between the 980 and the Titan X is not that big. They won't be able to handicap the 980Ti DP performance enough to make Titan X feasible.
My 2 cents. I could be wrong, but I don't see Nvidia completely sabotaging the number of Titan X sells.
EDIT: If I think about it.. If this 980Ti would be around 850-900$ the Titan X would still be feasible. 100$ extra could justify the extra 6GB of VRAM on the Titan X. But 900$ for the 980Ti is above AMD's intended 390x price. It all depends whether the 390x will be competitive since the leaked slides are not accurate (the Titan X performance in those slides was quite off).
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5038887 Posted on: 03/27/2015 10:50 AM
Unless they cut it down it will be yet another middle finger to Titan owners.
But if GM200 internal working is same as GM2014, then cutting would again cripple access to part of installed memory. In such case nVidia would end up between "gimped/fake card" flame and throwing insult to Titan X owners' faces.
If 980Ti is full GM200-400 as Titan X, then price would have to be higher than $700 because not many people would pay 300$ for going from 6GB vram to 12GB.
(especially since we are very close to end of 28nm era, and we can expect another performance boost on 16/14nm by start of 2016 due to improved transistor density, heat per square mm and maximum numbers of transistors which can fit into one chip)
Unless they cut it down it will be yet another middle finger to Titan owners.
But if GM200 internal working is same as GM2014, then cutting would again cripple access to part of installed memory. In such case nVidia would end up between "gimped/fake card" flame and throwing insult to Titan X owners' faces.
If 980Ti is full GM200-400 as Titan X, then price would have to be higher than $700 because not many people would pay 300$ for going from 6GB vram to 12GB.
(especially since we are very close to end of 28nm era, and we can expect another performance boost on 16/14nm by start of 2016 due to improved transistor density, heat per square mm and maximum numbers of transistors which can fit into one chip)
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2492
Joined: 2007-10-20
If this is true and nothing is changed except the memory size,then the 980ti will be faster&cheaper than the titan x.
And quite to be expected considering the last gen titan vs 780ti.