ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming review
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review
Intel Core i5 8600K processor review
Middle-Earth Shadow of War: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Toshiba TR200 SSD 960GB Review
Cooler Master MasterCase H500P review
ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Poseidon Review
Intel Core i7 8700K processor review
Gigabyte Aorus Z370 Gaming 7 review
Gigabyte Aorus Z370 Ultra Gaming review
Geekbench results for Raven Ridge 2500U
Probably the one entity where most results leak from Geekbench, and guess what. Raven Ridge Geekbench scores have just surfaced. It invokes the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with Radeon Vega Graphics @ 2.00 GHz 1 processor, 4 cores and 8 threads.
Earlier on Ryzen 7 2700U also already was spotted, but the more mainstream Ryzen 5 2500U APU certainly manages to impress. The Ryzen 5 2500U will make use of a AMD Radeon Vega 8 based mobile graphics architecture. The new APUs are expected to arrive late this year or more likely, in Q1 2018 with a CES announcement. This will be the AMD Ryzen 2000 series of APUsincluding Ryzen Mobile APUs.
| AMD Mandolin | |
|---|---|
| Operating System | Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) |
| Model | AMD Mandolin |
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with Radeon Vega Graphics @ 2.00 GHz 1 processor, 4 cores, 8 threads |
| Processor ID | AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 17 Stepping 0 |
| Processor Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Processor Package | |
| L1 Instruction Cache | 32 KB x 4 |
| L1 Data Cache | 64 KB x 4 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB x 4 |
| L3 Cache | 4096 KB |
| Motherboard | AMD Mandolin |
| Northbridge | AMD Ryzen SOC 00 |
| Southbridge | AMD Carrizo FCH 51 |
| BIOS | Insyde Corp. 1000EPreS3046_P08226 |
| Memory | 7848 MB 300MHz |
Thanks to heffeque for the spot.
Raven Ridge 2500U
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3989399
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3989399
Socket 2066 (Core i9-7960X) Processor with 16 cores surfaces in GeekBench - 07/24/2017 02:29 PM
In the GeekBench ranking list a new 16-core processor with 32-threads has surfaced. The unit is tagged as Socket 2066 and thus is the recently announced (yet not available) Core i9-7960X. The resul...
Intel 6-core Coffee Lake Surfaces in GeekBench (again) - 06/27/2017 05:17 PM
An Intel upcoming 6-core Coffee Lake generation processor has surfaces in GeekBench (again). This CPU scored 4619 points on a single thread and 20828 on multi-threading. A comparable slightly clocked ...
32-core Intel Xeon results surface in Geekbench - 03/20/2017 05:34 PM
The first results of a 32-core Intel Xeon processor have surfaced in Geekbench. Presumably this would be Skylake-EP from the pending Purley-platform. Intel earlier on indicated that this platform wo...
Jagman
Posts: 1956
Joined: 2005-03-26
Posts: 1956
Joined: 2005-03-26
#5471988 Posted on: 09/14/2017 03:04 PM
Those scores don't look that bad to me. Compares well against a Intel Core i5-6360U also at 2GHz (better in the multi of course) https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/1772
Those scores don't look that bad to me. Compares well against a Intel Core i5-6360U also at 2GHz (better in the multi of course) https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/1772
schmidtbag
Posts: 2117
Joined: 2012-11-10
Posts: 2117
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5472007 Posted on: 09/14/2017 03:49 PM
Looks a bit lacklustre at the moment hopefully they can get things going a bit quicker before release.
I was kinda hoping they'd integrate HBM into the chip and go after the NUC market.
You do know this is a mobile chip with 8 threads, right? Considering it's called a Ryzen 5, that leads me to believe AMD intends to release something more powerful. Right now the closest competitor to the 2500U would be the i7-8650U. The Geekbench scores for that are 4432, 11963 (single, multi respectively). Though the 8650U has a 1.9 base clock, a configurable TDP clock of 2.1GHz, and a whopping turbo of 4.2GHz. Even if the heatsink on the tested platform is crap, having more than double the frequency for even just one or two seconds could make the difference for such a significant score improvement.
I'd say the 2500U seems to be pretty decent so far.
Looks a bit lacklustre at the moment hopefully they can get things going a bit quicker before release.
I was kinda hoping they'd integrate HBM into the chip and go after the NUC market.
You do know this is a mobile chip with 8 threads, right? Considering it's called a Ryzen 5, that leads me to believe AMD intends to release something more powerful. Right now the closest competitor to the 2500U would be the i7-8650U. The Geekbench scores for that are 4432, 11963 (single, multi respectively). Though the 8650U has a 1.9 base clock, a configurable TDP clock of 2.1GHz, and a whopping turbo of 4.2GHz. Even if the heatsink on the tested platform is crap, having more than double the frequency for even just one or two seconds could make the difference for such a significant score improvement.
I'd say the 2500U seems to be pretty decent so far.
chispy
Posts: 7846
Joined: 2006-10-29
Posts: 7846
Joined: 2006-10-29
#5472010 Posted on: 09/14/2017 03:56 PM
Not bad
, my old FM1 llano htpc platform needs an update and this look like it will be the replacement , x370 mini itx here i come ...
Not bad
, my old FM1 llano htpc platform needs an update and this look like it will be the replacement , x370 mini itx here i come ...
SweenJM
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2017-09-10
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2017-09-10
#5472085 Posted on: 09/14/2017 07:05 PM
Very interested to see a laptop based on zen apu.
Very interested to see a laptop based on zen apu.
heffeque
Junior Member
Posts: 3825
Joined: 2003-03-03
Junior Member
Posts: 3825
Joined: 2003-03-03
#5472093 Posted on: 09/14/2017 07:25 PM
I really really wanted Raven Ridge to be available for winter solstice vacations and not Q1.
Glad to see great results though.
I really really wanted Raven Ridge to be available for winter solstice vacations and not Q1.
Glad to see great results though.
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 13239
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 13239
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5472119 Posted on: 09/14/2017 08:07 PM
Man that's a low clocked rate for the cpu cores. I'm interested in seeing gpu performance of the APU cores.
Man that's a low clocked rate for the cpu cores. I'm interested in seeing gpu performance of the APU cores.
schmidtbag
Moderator
Posts: 2117
Joined: 2012-11-10
Moderator
Posts: 2117
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5472121 Posted on: 09/14/2017 08:12 PM
For a mobile CPU, 2GHz is a reasonable base clock. I'm guessing the XFR speeds will be higher.
Man that's a low clocked rate for the cpu cores. I'm interested in seeing gpu performance of the APU cores.
For a mobile CPU, 2GHz is a reasonable base clock. I'm guessing the XFR speeds will be higher.
Yogi
Moderator
Posts: 116
Joined: 2015-06-25
Moderator
Posts: 116
Joined: 2015-06-25
#5472169 Posted on: 09/14/2017 10:45 PM
You do know this is a mobile chip with 8 threads, right? Considering it's called a Ryzen 5, that leads me to believe AMD intends to release something more powerful. Right now the closest competitor to the 2500U would be the i7-8650U. The Geekbench scores for that are 4432, 11963 (single, multi respectively). Though the 8650U has a 1.9 base clock, a configurable TDP clock of 2.1GHz, and a whopping turbo of 4.2GHz. Even if the heatsink on the tested platform is crap, having more than double the frequency for even just one or two seconds could make the difference for such a significant score improvement.
I'd say the 2500U seems to be pretty decent so far.
Okay, I assumed it was a desktop chip.
You do know this is a mobile chip with 8 threads, right? Considering it's called a Ryzen 5, that leads me to believe AMD intends to release something more powerful. Right now the closest competitor to the 2500U would be the i7-8650U. The Geekbench scores for that are 4432, 11963 (single, multi respectively). Though the 8650U has a 1.9 base clock, a configurable TDP clock of 2.1GHz, and a whopping turbo of 4.2GHz. Even if the heatsink on the tested platform is crap, having more than double the frequency for even just one or two seconds could make the difference for such a significant score improvement.
I'd say the 2500U seems to be pretty decent so far.
Okay, I assumed it was a desktop chip.
D3M1G0D
Moderator
Posts: 369
Joined: 2017-03-10
Moderator
Posts: 369
Joined: 2017-03-10
#5472172 Posted on: 09/14/2017 10:58 PM
I'll wait for some real benchmark numbers - I never trust Geekbench.
I'll wait for some real benchmark numbers - I never trust Geekbench.
Aura89
Moderator
Posts: 6356
Joined: 2008-07-31
Moderator
Posts: 6356
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5472203 Posted on: 09/15/2017 03:15 AM
Looks a bit lacklustre at the moment hopefully they can get things going a bit quicker before release.
Um, 4 cores, 8 threads, at 2.0Ghz.
What exactly is "lackluster" in the performance coming from that?
That's right, nothing.
Looks a bit lacklustre at the moment hopefully they can get things going a bit quicker before release.
Um, 4 cores, 8 threads, at 2.0Ghz.
What exactly is "lackluster" in the performance coming from that?
That's right, nothing.
Fox2232
Moderator
Posts: 5610
Joined: 2012-07-20
Moderator
Posts: 5610
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5472224 Posted on: 09/15/2017 07:51 AM
It is OK performance. Should be noted, that Geekbench is not able to read actual clock in most cases.
Looking at ST vs MT, ST score is either with clock boost or MT without. With geekbench 1st few results are just shots in the dark. One needs dozens to properly understand what to expect from chip.
Anyway, I am more interested in those 11CU in Vega GPU. And apparently I expect them to tick ~1,2GHz. I expect double graphical performance than Carrizo delivered.
It is OK performance. Should be noted, that Geekbench is not able to read actual clock in most cases.
Looking at ST vs MT, ST score is either with clock boost or MT without. With geekbench 1st few results are just shots in the dark. One needs dozens to properly understand what to expect from chip.
Anyway, I am more interested in those 11CU in Vega GPU. And apparently I expect them to tick ~1,2GHz. I expect double graphical performance than Carrizo delivered.
Turanis
Moderator
Posts: 1140
Joined: 2014-08-15
Moderator
Posts: 1140
Joined: 2014-08-15
#5472283 Posted on: 09/15/2017 01:12 PM
With 8mb L3 cache and 3.0 GHz the Raven Ridge will be better.
But for laptops could be enough this low specs,but not for long run.
With 8mb L3 cache and 3.0 GHz the Raven Ridge will be better.
But for laptops could be enough this low specs,but not for long run.
Amx85
Moderator
Posts: 267
Joined: 2016-09-28
Moderator
Posts: 267
Joined: 2016-09-28
#5472316 Posted on: 09/15/2017 03:04 PM
People check for BIOS updates, new AGESA on the air 1.0.0.6b (saw on MSI website on some Motherboards)
People check for BIOS updates, new AGESA on the air 1.0.0.6b (saw on MSI website on some Motherboards)
schmidtbag
Moderator
Posts: 2117
Joined: 2012-11-10
Moderator
Posts: 2117
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5472317 Posted on: 09/15/2017 03:09 PM
I have a Biostar board - I'll be lucky if I get another update by the time AM4 APUs are released.
People check for BIOS updates, new AGESA on the air 1.0.0.6b (saw on MSI website on some Motherboards)
I have a Biostar board - I'll be lucky if I get another update by the time AM4 APUs are released.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 116
Joined: 2015-06-25
Looks a bit lacklustre at the moment hopefully they can get things going a bit quicker before release.
I was kinda hoping they'd integrate HBM into the chip and go after the NUC market.