MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Geekbench results for Raven Ridge 2500U
Probably the one entity where most results leak from Geekbench, and guess what. Raven Ridge Geekbench scores have just surfaced. It invokes the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with Radeon Vega Graphics @ 2.00 GHz 1 processor, 4 cores and 8 threads.
Earlier on Ryzen 7 2700U also already was spotted, but the more mainstream Ryzen 5 2500U APU certainly manages to impress. The Ryzen 5 2500U will make use of a AMD Radeon Vega 8 based mobile graphics architecture. The new APUs are expected to arrive late this year or more likely, in Q1 2018 with a CES announcement. This will be the AMD Ryzen 2000 series of APUsincluding Ryzen Mobile APUs.
AMD Mandolin | |
---|---|
Operating System | Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) |
Model | AMD Mandolin |
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with Radeon Vega Graphics @ 2.00 GHz 1 processor, 4 cores, 8 threads |
Processor ID | AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 17 Stepping 0 |
Processor Codename | Raven Ridge |
Processor Package | |
L1 Instruction Cache | 32 KB x 4 |
L1 Data Cache | 64 KB x 4 |
L2 Cache | 512 KB x 4 |
L3 Cache | 4096 KB |
Motherboard | AMD Mandolin |
Northbridge | AMD Ryzen SOC 00 |
Southbridge | AMD Carrizo FCH 51 |
BIOS | Insyde Corp. 1000EPreS3046_P08226 |
Memory | 7848 MB 300MHz |
Thanks to heffeque for the spot.
Raven Ridge 2500U
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3989399
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3989399
« ASUS Prime X399 Ryzen Threadripper Getting Available · Geekbench results for Raven Ridge 2500U
· Corsair Launches its Fastest Ever DDR4 Kit - Vengeance LPX 16GB 4600MHz »
Socket 2066 (Core i9-7960X) Processor with 16 cores surfaces in GeekBench - 07/24/2017 01:29 PM
In the GeekBench ranking list a new 16-core processor with 32-threads has surfaced. The unit is tagged as Socket 2066 and thus is the recently announced (yet not available) Core i9-7960X. The resul...
Intel 6-core Coffee Lake Surfaces in GeekBench (again) - 06/27/2017 04:17 PM
An Intel upcoming 6-core Coffee Lake generation processor has surfaces in GeekBench (again). This CPU scored 4619 points on a single thread and 20828 on multi-threading. A comparable slightly clocked ...
32-core Intel Xeon results surface in Geekbench - 03/20/2017 04:34 PM
The first results of a 32-core Intel Xeon processor have surfaced in Geekbench. Presumably this would be Skylake-EP from the pending Purley-platform. Intel earlier on indicated that this platform wo...
Jagman
Senior Member
Posts: 2255
Joined: 2005-03-26
Senior Member
Posts: 2255
Joined: 2005-03-26
#5471988 Posted on: 09/14/2017 02:04 PM
Those scores don't look that bad to me. Compares well against a Intel Core i5-6360U also at 2GHz (better in the multi of course) https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/1772
Those scores don't look that bad to me. Compares well against a Intel Core i5-6360U also at 2GHz (better in the multi of course) https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/1772
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5640
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5640
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5472007 Posted on: 09/14/2017 02:49 PM
Looks a bit lacklustre at the moment hopefully they can get things going a bit quicker before release.
I was kinda hoping they'd integrate HBM into the chip and go after the NUC market.
You do know this is a mobile chip with 8 threads, right? Considering it's called a Ryzen 5, that leads me to believe AMD intends to release something more powerful. Right now the closest competitor to the 2500U would be the i7-8650U. The Geekbench scores for that are 4432, 11963 (single, multi respectively). Though the 8650U has a 1.9 base clock, a configurable TDP clock of 2.1GHz, and a whopping turbo of 4.2GHz. Even if the heatsink on the tested platform is crap, having more than double the frequency for even just one or two seconds could make the difference for such a significant score improvement.
I'd say the 2500U seems to be pretty decent so far.
Looks a bit lacklustre at the moment hopefully they can get things going a bit quicker before release.
I was kinda hoping they'd integrate HBM into the chip and go after the NUC market.
You do know this is a mobile chip with 8 threads, right? Considering it's called a Ryzen 5, that leads me to believe AMD intends to release something more powerful. Right now the closest competitor to the 2500U would be the i7-8650U. The Geekbench scores for that are 4432, 11963 (single, multi respectively). Though the 8650U has a 1.9 base clock, a configurable TDP clock of 2.1GHz, and a whopping turbo of 4.2GHz. Even if the heatsink on the tested platform is crap, having more than double the frequency for even just one or two seconds could make the difference for such a significant score improvement.
I'd say the 2500U seems to be pretty decent so far.
chispy
Senior Member
Posts: 8933
Joined: 2006-10-29
Senior Member
Posts: 8933
Joined: 2006-10-29
#5472010 Posted on: 09/14/2017 02:56 PM
Not bad
, my old FM1 llano htpc platform needs an update and this look like it will be the replacement , x370 mini itx here i come ...
Not bad

Deleted member 271771
Unregistered
Unregistered
#5472085 Posted on: 09/14/2017 06:05 PM
Very interested to see a laptop based on zen apu.
Very interested to see a laptop based on zen apu.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 263
Joined: 2015-06-25
Looks a bit lacklustre at the moment hopefully they can get things going a bit quicker before release.
I was kinda hoping they'd integrate HBM into the chip and go after the NUC market.