Corsair iCUE LS100 Monitor Back Lighting Kit Review
Fractal Design ION+ Platinum 660 and 860W PSU review
Silverstone Permafrost PF240 liquid cooler review
Intel Core i9 9900KS processor review
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
ASUS PRIME X570 Pro review
ASUS ROG STRIX Scope keyboard review
GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super WTF review
ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
G.SKILL Creates DDR4 32GB Memory Kit at 4400MHz CL19-19-19-39
G.SKILL are thrilled to announce the never-seen-before 32GB (4x8GB) Trident Z memory kit at an extremely blistering DDR4-4400MHz CL19-19-19-39. This new DDR4 Trident Z dual-channel memory kit upgrades the four-DIMM configuration to the next level as the world’s fastest 32GB (4x8GB) memory kit in the world.
Taipei, Taiwan (17 November 2017) – G.SKILL International Enterprise Co., Ltd., the world’s leading manufacturer of extreme performance memory and gaming peripherals, is thrilled to announce the never-seen-before 32GB (4x8GB) Trident Z memory kit at an extremely blistering DDR4-4400MHz CL19-19-19-39. This new DDR4 Trident Z dual-channel memory kit upgrades the four-DIMM configuration to the next level as the world’s fastest 32GB (4x8GB) memory kit in the world. These extremely high-speed desktop modules are manufactured with rigorously tested and binned ultra-performance Samsung B-die DDR4 ICs.
After the launch of the 8th Gen Intel Core processors and Z370 chipset motherboards, G.SKILL has been constantly pushing DDR4 speeds faster than ever before to higher levels with various capacity configurations. With the availability of the ASUS OptiMem technology, which complements the T-Toplogy layout that uses equalized trace lengths, four-DIMM memory configuration has improved stability and memory overclocking performance. G.SKILL Trident Z memory once again achieves the world’s fastest 32GB memory kit at the ultra-high DDR4-4400MHz speed, with an exceptionally aggressive timing of CL19-19-19-39 in 32GB (4x8GB) at 1.5V. Below is the screenshot of the memory kit being stress tested and demonstrating its stability on the ASUS ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) motherboard with the Intel® Core™ i7-8700K processor.
Whether it’s for a seasoned overclocking veteran or an enthusiast who is on the path of hardware overclocking for benchmark world records, this new Trident Z series DDR4-4400MHz 32GB kit is programmed with the Intel XMP 2.0 profile to help easily enable the memory settings in BIOS. Of course, that wouldn’t stop anyone from manually tweaking the settings further to eke out every last ounce of performance from a DDR4 system.
G.SKILL Releases DDR4-3800MHz 32GB (4x8GB) SO-DIMM Memory Kit for Mini-ITX - 10/20/2017 01:18 PM
G.SKILL are thrilled to announce the release of a new high performance DDR4 Ripjaws SO-DIMM series for small-form factor (SFF) platforms, at DDR4-3800MHz CL18-18-18-38 32GB (4x8GB) at 1.35V, making th...
G.Skill launches Trident Z RGB DDR4-4266 32GB Quad-channel Kit - 10/13/2017 12:40 PM
G.SKILL announces their latest Trident Z RGB memory kit that boosts RGB-infused DDR4-4266MHz memory kits to a never-before-seen 32GB (4x8GB) configuration! Built from ultra-high performance Samsung B-...
G.SKILL Releases New DDR4 Specifications for Intel Coffee Lake Platform - 10/06/2017 07:40 AM
G.Skill are thrilled to announce new Trident Z and Trident Z RGB specifications for latest 8th Gen Intel Core processors built on the Coffee Lake microarchitecture and Z370 chipset motherboards, manu...
G.SKILL Releases New GDS v2.0 Update for KM780RGB & KM570 RGB Keyboards - 09/29/2017 02:31 PM
It seems software is getting as important as the hardware itself these days, should you have purchased one based on our reviews, please do upgrade the GDS software to update v2.0 for KM780RGB & K...
G.SKILL Releases New AMD Compatible Trident Z RGB kits for AMD Ryzen - 09/22/2017 08:37 AM
G.SKILL are excited to announce a new lineup of Trident Z RGB DDR4 memory kits with enhanced compatibility on the latest AMD platforms. Specifically designed for AMD Ryzen and Ryzen Threadripper plat...
The Edge
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: 2012-05-02
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: 2012-05-02
#5493262 Posted on: 11/17/2017 04:58 PM
"World's fastest...in the world."
Well I guess, you know what I mean...
"World's fastest...in the world."
Well I guess, you know what I mean...
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9717
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 9717
Joined: 2003-05-24
#5493347 Posted on: 11/17/2017 09:35 PM
does the "speed" make the much higher "timing" worth it? is this "speed" even noticablely?
I dont want to hear about DDR5, i would like to make upgrade my system 2 more times using the DDR4 i have. short of the ram out right dying on me and i never had ram out right die on me.
does the "speed" make the much higher "timing" worth it? is this "speed" even noticablely?
I dont want to hear about DDR5, i would like to make upgrade my system 2 more times using the DDR4 i have. short of the ram out right dying on me and i never had ram out right die on me.
kruno
Senior Member
Posts: 252
Joined: 2017-09-25
Senior Member
Posts: 252
Joined: 2017-09-25
#5493356 Posted on: 11/17/2017 09:52 PM
does the "speed" make the much higher "timing" worth it? is this "speed" even noticablely?
I dont want to hear about DDR5, i would like to make upgrade my system 2 more times using the DDR4 i have. short of the ram out right dying on me and i never had ram out right die on me.
Short answer NO,long answer if you don't juggle a lot of data, meaning mostly databases you want notice the difference,and timings are not going to get better,you need to take in consideration distance between RAM and CPU,with these multi GHz speeds they don't have much room to lover timings unless they start putting multigiga ram on cpu ala HBM
does the "speed" make the much higher "timing" worth it? is this "speed" even noticablely?
I dont want to hear about DDR5, i would like to make upgrade my system 2 more times using the DDR4 i have. short of the ram out right dying on me and i never had ram out right die on me.
Short answer NO,long answer if you don't juggle a lot of data, meaning mostly databases you want notice the difference,and timings are not going to get better,you need to take in consideration distance between RAM and CPU,with these multi GHz speeds they don't have much room to lover timings unless they start putting multigiga ram on cpu ala HBM
user1
Senior Member
Posts: 1426
Joined: 2016-01-29
Senior Member
Posts: 1426
Joined: 2016-01-29
#5493388 Posted on: 11/18/2017 12:22 AM
does the "speed" make the much higher "timing" worth it? is this "speed" even noticablely?
I dont want to hear about DDR5, i would like to make upgrade my system 2 more times using the DDR4 i have. short of the ram out right dying on me and i never had ram out right die on me.
this particular kit is pretty tight, it would be faster than 3200 cl14, how much faster? maybe 2%-5% depending on the system, but ultimately kits like these while they can be used at the rated speed on specific platforms, are proabably better suited to being hand tuned at lower frequencies , you can probably do cl 13-cl12 @ 3200 with this highly binned ram with reasonable voltages, which will be a decent bit faster.
ddr5 ain't coming anytime soon, would be after 2020, and even then it will be very expensive, unlikely to be mainstream for quite some time. on top of this, the amount of overlap will be much higher than with ddr3/ddr4, you can buy ddr3 3200mhz cl13 kits (if you sell a kidney )which would be as fast or faster than a decent ddr4 kit, the same will likely be true of ddr5, unless they end up hitting like 4500mhz with really low timings,there isn't going to be much of a difference performance wise.
does the "speed" make the much higher "timing" worth it? is this "speed" even noticablely?
I dont want to hear about DDR5, i would like to make upgrade my system 2 more times using the DDR4 i have. short of the ram out right dying on me and i never had ram out right die on me.
this particular kit is pretty tight, it would be faster than 3200 cl14, how much faster? maybe 2%-5% depending on the system, but ultimately kits like these while they can be used at the rated speed on specific platforms, are proabably better suited to being hand tuned at lower frequencies , you can probably do cl 13-cl12 @ 3200 with this highly binned ram with reasonable voltages, which will be a decent bit faster.
ddr5 ain't coming anytime soon, would be after 2020, and even then it will be very expensive, unlikely to be mainstream for quite some time. on top of this, the amount of overlap will be much higher than with ddr3/ddr4, you can buy ddr3 3200mhz cl13 kits (if you sell a kidney )which would be as fast or faster than a decent ddr4 kit, the same will likely be true of ddr5, unless they end up hitting like 4500mhz with really low timings,there isn't going to be much of a difference performance wise.
David Lake
Senior Member
Posts: 681
Joined: 2008-03-03
Senior Member
Posts: 681
Joined: 2008-03-03
#5493393 Posted on: 11/18/2017 12:51 AM
To anyone thinking bigger latency numbers means slower, the numbers are clock cycles not time, the timings compensate for higher clock frequencies to maintain stability of the DRAM.
Put loosely, 1000MHz at 5-5-5-15 would have the same latency as 2000MHz at 10-10-10-30 but with a higher bandwidth.
To anyone thinking bigger latency numbers means slower, the numbers are clock cycles not time, the timings compensate for higher clock frequencies to maintain stability of the DRAM.
Put loosely, 1000MHz at 5-5-5-15 would have the same latency as 2000MHz at 10-10-10-30 but with a higher bandwidth.
Toss3
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Joined: 2010-03-25
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Joined: 2010-03-25
#5493498 Posted on: 11/18/2017 01:15 PM
To anyone thinking bigger latency numbers means slower, the numbers are clock cycles not time, the timings compensate for higher clock frequencies to maintain stability of the DRAM.
Put loosely, 1000MHz at 5-5-5-15 would have the same latency as 2000MHz at 10-10-10-30 but with a higher bandwidth.
So when overclocking would it be a good idea to try to keep the latency/clockspeed ratio constant (as speed does seem to be more important than latency anyways)?
To anyone thinking bigger latency numbers means slower, the numbers are clock cycles not time, the timings compensate for higher clock frequencies to maintain stability of the DRAM.
Put loosely, 1000MHz at 5-5-5-15 would have the same latency as 2000MHz at 10-10-10-30 but with a higher bandwidth.
So when overclocking would it be a good idea to try to keep the latency/clockspeed ratio constant (as speed does seem to be more important than latency anyways)?
Koniakki
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15
#5493631 Posted on: 11/18/2017 09:13 PM
G.Skill TridentZ F4-4266C19D-16GTZA on my current rig.
Didn't touch subs or tertiary. Waiting for a bloody 8700K(Asrock Extreme 4) to really push this kit.
G.Skill TridentZ F4-4266C19D-16GTZA on my current rig.
Didn't touch subs or tertiary. Waiting for a bloody 8700K(Asrock Extreme 4) to really push this kit.
user1
Senior Member
Posts: 1426
Joined: 2016-01-29
Senior Member
Posts: 1426
Joined: 2016-01-29
#5493661 Posted on: 11/18/2017 11:58 PM
Depends on the application/platform, bandwidth heavy apps will benefit from the higher speeds(7zip for example), but if the bandwidth isn't saturated it may make no difference at all. And in other applications the latency will have more of an effect.
in this case, you tend to see increasingly diminishing returns past 3200-3600mhz on both current intel and amd plaforms, in which case you're probably better off doing 3600mhz cl14 (like koniakk has done above) than 4000mhz + with highend kits
So when overclocking would it be a good idea to try to keep the latency/clockspeed ratio constant (as speed does seem to be more important than latency anyways)?
Depends on the application/platform, bandwidth heavy apps will benefit from the higher speeds(7zip for example), but if the bandwidth isn't saturated it may make no difference at all. And in other applications the latency will have more of an effect.
in this case, you tend to see increasingly diminishing returns past 3200-3600mhz on both current intel and amd plaforms, in which case you're probably better off doing 3600mhz cl14 (like koniakk has done above) than 4000mhz + with highend kits
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 252
Joined: 2017-09-25
Ok yesterday there was news about Corsair and theirs 4333MHz memory today is about G.Skill and theirs 4400MHz kit,who is next tomorrow?? We need to open some kind of gambling shop so we can place bets on speed of the RAM and the name of the company that is going to take crown