Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review

New Downloads
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24
GeForce 512.77 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1960
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.1 WHQL driver download
3DMark Download v2.22.7359 + Time Spy


New Forum Topics
Gigabyte confirms AMD X670 chipset based motherboards Computex 2022 Press Release AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - Deathloop preview Minisforum HX90G has RX 6650M discrete graphics Qualcomm announces Snapdragon 8+ and 7 Gen 1 Silicon Power Announces UD90 PCIe 4.0 SSD [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) Free to grab: Borderlands 3 free on Epic Games Store 5700x & B550 TUF NVIDIA LHR version 3 anti-crypto algorithm for RTX 3050/3080 12GB would be 90% unlocked Windows 11 Release Build




Guru3D.com » News » Futuremark Updates 3DMark with API Overhead Feature Test

Futuremark Updates 3DMark with API Overhead Feature Test

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/26/2015 08:09 PM | source: | 36 comment(s)
Futuremark Updates 3DMark with API Overhead Feature Test

Futuremark updates its software and included a 3DMark API Overhead feature test for measuring differences in DirectX 12, DirectX 11 and Mantle API performance.

The new test is only available in the Advanced and Professional Editions of 3DMark.

The purpose of the test is to compare the relative performance of different APIs on a single system, rather than the absolute performance of different systems. The API Overhead feature test is not a general-purpose GPU benchmark, and it should not be used to compare graphics cards from different vendors. (We are working on a DirectX 12 benchmark with game-like workloads, which we expect to release soon after the public launch of Windows 10.)


Windows 10 - feature Test @ 1080P 

There has been much talk this year of new graphics APIs that let developers code 'close to the metal.' And though it's natural to think of the GPU, the benefits of APIs with lower overhead are actually achieved by making better use of multi-core CPUs to streamline code execution and eliminate software bottlenecks, particularly for draw calls.

A draw call happens when the CPU tells the GPU to draw an object on the screen. Games typically make thousands of draw calls per frame, but each one creates performance-limiting overhead for the CPU.

As the number of draw calls rises, graphics engines become limited by API overhead. New APIs like DirectX 12 and Mantle reduce that overhead allowing more draw calls. With more draw calls, a game engine can draw more objects, textures and effects to the screen.

The 3DMark API Overhead feature test measures API performance by making a steadily increasing number of draw calls. The result of the test is the maximum number of draw calls per second achieved by each API before the frame rate drops below 30 fps. 

What are the system requirements?

  • The DirectX 12 test requires a PC running an up-to-date version of Windows 10 Technical Preview (build 10041 or later), 4 GB of system memory, and DirectX feature level 11_0 compatible hardware with at least at least 1 GB of graphics memory.
  • The Mantle test requires 4 GB of system memory and AMD hardware that supports the Mantle API.
  • The DirectX 11 test requires DirectX feature level 11_0 compatible hardware with at least 1 GB of graphics memory and 4 GB of system memory.

Release notes:

  • 3DMark Windows v1.5.884
  • March 26, 2015


This major update adds the API Overhead feature test, the world's first independent test for comparing the performance of DirectX 12, Mantle, and DirectX 11. See how many draw calls your PC can handle with each API before the frame rate drops below 30 fps.

  • Compare DirectX 12, DirectX 11 and Mantle with the new API Overhead Feature Test, available in 3DMark Advanced Edition and 3DMark Professional Edition.
  • Added Feature Test selection screen.
  • Improved
  • Improved formatting of larger scores to make them more readable.
  • Result screen automatically shows FPS after running a single test.

Fixed

  • Fixed a bug that could cause the Sky Diver demo to hang at the cave entrance scene.

Download



Futuremark Updates 3DMark with API Overhead Feature Test




« MSI new Gaming All-in-One PCs featuring IPS technology, 3K and 4K displays · Futuremark Updates 3DMark with API Overhead Feature Test · Micron and Intel Unveil New 3D NAND Flash Memory »

Related Stories

Futuremark Updates SystemInfo To Solve Intel X99 Platform Issues - 09/03/2014 08:37 AM
Futuremark issued an update for that fixes a compatibility issue with Intel X99 chipset motherboards for all currently supported versions of 3DMark and PCMark. SystemInfo is a component used in all F...

Futuremark Updated 3DMark to v1.2.250 Download - 12/11/2013 09:55 AM
Futuremark released an update to its 3DMark (2013) graphics benchmark suite. Version 1.2.250 this patch introduces the Ice Storm Unlimited test already seen on the mobile versions of 3DMark. Other tes...

Futuremark Announces PCMark 8 - 05/20/2013 02:07 PM
You won't be surprised to learn that FM has been working on a new PCMark. For the first time in the series, PCMark 8 will combine performance testing with battery life measurement. You can estimate b...

Rovio Acquires Futuremark Games Studio - 03/27/2012 01:32 PM
Futuremark Games Studio has been acquired by rapidly expanding Finnish developer Rovio Entertainment, creator of Angry Birds. The Shattered Horizon, Hungribles and Unstoppable Gorg IPs will remain wit...

Futuremark: don't expect better browser perf on new Ipad - 03/21/2012 12:12 PM
Futuremark issued a weird press reelase today. Futuremark, the world leader in performance benchmarking software, today released the first benchmark results for the new iPad using Peacekeeper, its fr...


8 pages « < 5 6 7 8


guppysb
Member



Posts: 57
Joined: 2012-05-12

#5038595 Posted on: 03/26/2015 10:44 PM
Ahh OK, thanks, will hold off on the win 10 install then so


Also, I would be cautious of factory installed key loggers....

Redemption80
Senior Member



Posts: 18495
Joined: 2009-01-06

#5038712 Posted on: 03/27/2015 02:01 AM
That is supposed to be in an OS to test, totally pointless people using it if it doesn't log everything.

waltc3
Senior Member



Posts: 1376
Joined: 2014-07-22

#5038752 Posted on: 03/27/2015 03:20 AM
NEED TO SEE RESULTS NOW!!!!!!!

lol, im really looking forward to this, if its good i might even install Win10 to try it out

Win10x64 is really coming along nicely as of this latest build. Big, giant improvement already over stock 8/8.1. Still, I'd strongly advise anyone planning on running it to do a dual-boot w/Win8/7 (or whatever you are running.) Doing a clean install each build clocks me in at less than 30 minutes, complete. I did an upgrade install of 10041--with merely a handful of programs installed--took me *two hours* on the same system--and that's upgrading one Win10 build over another Win10 build. I can only imagine that if I was foolish enough to be using Win10 as a primary OS right now, and I had a lot programs installed, and I was upgrading from Win7--that it would take me closer to *three hours*, maybe... ;) I'm not going to upgrade my Win8.1 installation until I can do it with the final version of Win10--when Microsoft drops the "Preview" label.

waltc3
Senior Member



Posts: 1376
Joined: 2014-07-22

#5038755 Posted on: 03/27/2015 03:34 AM
All of those scores are relative. System configuration is going to have an effect on the scores, as usual. The faster the CPU and GPU, the more draw calls. To an extent, we'll still be able to use these scores for comparison to other systems. You just won't be able to properly compare AMD vs NVidia.


That's true, but I really think that performance in general--with D3d12 games, of course--is going to skyrocket, with some performance gains of ~50%, in some rare cases, maybe... But even an average of 20%-30% performance improvement on the same hardware is nothing to sneeze at, right? Pretty amazing I think.

What I anticipate happening on the cpu side of things is that suddenly single-core performance will take a back seat to multicore performance in the latest games, and AMD cpus look *much stronger* in proper multicore applications than they do in single-core apps--so I think the upshot is that in CPU performance Intel won't see much of a gain--maybe even a slight drop in performance in d3d12 multicore games that hit multiple cores hard, while AMD is suddenly going to look much better than it has...Interesting times...

But more than that, I think D3d12 games will really start to throw general performance to GPUs while making both AMD & Intel CPUs in general seem much less important in the scheme of things than they seem at present.

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 13716
Joined: 2004-05-16

#5038757 Posted on: 03/27/2015 03:39 AM
That's true, but I really think that performance in general--with D3d12 games, of course--is going to skyrocket, with some performance gains of ~50%, in some rare cases, maybe... But even an average of 20%-30% performance improvement on the same hardware is nothing to sneeze at, right? Pretty amazing I think.

What I anticipate happening on the cpu side of things is that suddenly single-core performance will take a back seat to multicore performance in the latest games, and AMD cpus look *much stronger* in proper multicore applications than they do in single-core apps--so I think the upshot is that in CPU performance Intel won't see much of a gain--maybe even a slight drop in performance in d3d12 multicore games that hit multiple cores hard, while AMD is suddenly going to look much better than it has...Interesting times...

But more than that, I think D3d12 games will really start to throw general performance to GPUs while making both AMD & Intel CPUs in general seem much less important in the scheme of things than they seem at present.

The performance of DX12 has negative scaling when core count goes above 4. Although that may change by the time DX12 properly ships.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/8962/the-directx-12-performance-preview-amd-nvidia-star-swarm/4

8 pages « < 5 6 7 8


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022