Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 WHQL driver download
GeForce 516.59 WHQL driver download
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.22 Download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download v4.06.10.651
CrystalDiskInfo 8.17 Download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 Windows 7 driver download
ReShade download v5.2.2
HWiNFO Download v7.26
7-Zip v22.00 Download


New Forum Topics
FSR Thread AMD Radeon Software - UWP NVIDIA GeForce 516.59 WHQL driver download & Discussion AMD Says RDNA3 50% Perf/Watt increase and mentions RDNA4 AMD is planning to release Ryzen 7000 CPUs in September Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning Is 2090 gpu core a good O.C for a 3080ti? Kingston launches Iron Key Vault Privacy 80 hardware encrypted SSD with touch panel Synology DiskStation DS1522+ for versatile data management Display Driver Uninstaller Thread




Guru3D.com » News » First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear

First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/13/2016 05:01 PM | source: | 62 comment(s)
First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear

Over at videocardz they posted what they claim to be the benchmark results for the GeForce GTX 1080. The latest results indicate the numbers for an overclocked part.

As posted: 

According to the leaker GTX 1080 was running at a 2114 MHz clock (stock boost is 1733 MHz). 



First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear




« New Polaris10 and Polaris11 Specifications · First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear · Playstation 4 Neo Arrives End September »

13 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


XenthorX
Senior Member



Posts: 4145
Joined: 2014-06-17

#5272590 Posted on: 05/13/2016 06:46 PM
Actually from my 3DMark FS scores and others, over at OC.net, the stock GTX 1080 score is almost identical to a 1560MHz/8000MHz 980Ti.

- i7 5820K @ 4.75GHz
- 980ti GB Xtreme Windforce @ 1565 / 2049
- Score: 19069 Graphics: 21833
- Date (1/21/2016)

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/10387773

So we can conclude that an OCed 980Ti@1550-1560MHz is offering stock GTX 1080 performance, as we already had assume from the first leaked 3DMark score of the GTX 1080.

Atleast in the synthetic 3DMark Firestrike benchmark that is.

I wonder how much is related to your CPU oc, pretty sure i can hit 21833 with 4.7Ghz CPU. Already 21420 with 4.5Ghz and 1505Mhz core.

edit:
Well, i did the test but actually the impact is pretty small from CPU oc, i was expecting more.
4.7Ghz CPU and 1514Mhz Core GPU/7900Mhz memory gave me 21555
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8453809

Solfaur
Senior Member



Posts: 7686
Joined: 2005-08-10

#5272599 Posted on: 05/13/2016 06:53 PM
Well performance wise over OCed GTX 970's, I would only consider the GTX 1080 since even that seems so far as a "side-grade" at best. Which of course I would had taken it in a heartbeat over them for all the known reasons.

And as we know almost nothing performance wise about the GTX 1070 but since we already have the GTX 1080 as a baseline, only those coming from single 980/970 and below would benefit from it. And also from AMD comparable one's. Performance wise again I mean.

So to the point. Well the GTX 1070 will serve its purpose well according to all the rumors/info we have. But it wouldn't be the best payout.

Biggest payout obviously over GTX 970's is the GTX 1080 if you can spare the extra dough.

You also have to keep in mind that the benchmark score comparison is very relative to real world performance, as few games actually scale with multi-gpu setups like a 3DMark does. Whereas with one card, the performance will always be proportional to that benchmark score in real world scenarios.

I've already sold one of my 970s and about to sell the second as soon as I get my hands on an 1080 (or sooner). For me it's definitely not a sidegrade, as I'm really looking forward to not have to deal with SLI anymore. As much as I loved having 2 GPUs for 3 generations, SLI support is worse and worse and apparently with DX12 it won't get any better either. If that changes in the future, I will gladly go back to it.

But yes, I definitely agree that prices are overboard, but at least I don't have the urge to buy 2 cards anymore, as I usually did, otherwise this summer would have left me broke for good. :wanker:

Agent-A01
Senior Member



Posts: 11568
Joined: 2010-12-27

#5272624 Posted on: 05/13/2016 07:11 PM

So we can conclude that an OCed 980Ti@1550-1560MHz is offering stock GTX 1080 performance, as we already had assume from the first leaked 3DMark score of the GTX 1080.

Atleast in the synthetic 3DMark Firestrike benchmark that is.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7588802

Or bettering it.

People with Ti should wait for the 1080ti, 1080 isnt a good upgrade path.

Koniakki
Senior Member



Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15

#5272627 Posted on: 05/13/2016 07:15 PM
I wonder how much is related to your CPU oc, pretty sure i can hit 21833 with 4.7Ghz CPU. Already 21420 with 4.5Ghz and 1505Mhz core.

edit:
Well, i did the test but actually the impact is pretty small from CPU oc, i was expecting more.
4.7Ghz CPU and 1514Mhz Core GPU/7900Mhz memory gave me 21555
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8453809

I could have saved you the trouble.. :P


You also have to keep in mind that the benchmark score comparison is very relative to real world performance, as few games actually scale with multi-gpu setups like a 3DMark does. Whereas with one card, the performance will always be proportional to that benchmark score in real world scenarios.

I've already sold one of my 970s and about to sell the second as soon as I get my hands on an 1080 (or sooner). For me it's definitely not a sidegrade, as I'm really looking forward to not have to deal with SLI anymore. As much as I loved having 2 GPUs for 3 generations, SLI support is worse and worse and apparently with DX12 it won't get any better either. If that changes in the future, I will gladly go back to it.

But yes, I definitely agree that prices are overboard, but at least I don't have the urge to buy 2 cards anymore, as I usually did, otherwise this summer would have left me broke for good. :wanker:

As I said, I was entirely referring to performance wise. But yeah, totally agree. No one in their right mind would have chosen 970's SLI over GTX 1080. :thumbup:

XenthorX
Senior Member



Posts: 4145
Joined: 2014-06-17

#5272637 Posted on: 05/13/2016 07:24 PM
well, while on this trolling CPU clock i did this bench at 1518Mhz core 7900Mhz memory, 4.7Ghz CPU

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8453943



Now, back to legit cpu lol.

13 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022