First GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Benchmarks Leak Online
Somewhere in the Asia region somebody has a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in his or her PC, and a working driver as well as it seems as some performance numbers have revealed itself on the web.
There has been quite a bit of speculation on the GeForce GTX 1050 and Ti. Apparently there will be two models released, the regular 1050 with 2GB graphics memory yet also a 1050 Ti with 4GB memory. According to to an earlier leak from benchlife they claimed the replacement series for the GeForce GTX 950 will be the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with 2GB, this one would be based on a 640 shader processor en-counting GP107-300 Pascal-GPU. The second SKU would be the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, based on a GP107-400 Pascal based GPU with 768 shader processors. The cards will be priced at 119 and 139 USD respectively.
The benchmarks however surfaced over at Chiphell and next towards 3DMark 11 results a GPU-Z screenshot was posted. The manufacturer ID is Colorful and the card indeed has 4 GB GDDR5 memory / 128-bit. It scores 10054 points in the P score and 3867 points in the X mode, again this is 3DMark 11. That would be above the GeForce GTX 960 (X3302).
Now if we add that number to our own charts, this would be the generic picture (mind you that the results could be fake, hence a grain of salt, common sense and healthy skepticism always is recommended):
| |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX 1060 6 GB | GTX 1060 3 GB | GTX 1050 Ti | GTX 1050 | GTX 950 | |
GPU | GP106-400 | GP106-300 | GP107-400 | GP107-300 | GM206-250/251 |
Shader processors | 1280 | 1152 | 768 | 640 | 768 |
TMU's | 80 | 72 | 48 | 40 | 48 |
ROP's | 48 | 48 | 32 | TBA | 32 |
GPU freq | 1,506 MHz | 1,506 MHz | 1,290 MHz | 1,354 MHz | 1,024 MHz |
Boost freq | 1,709 MHz | 1,709 MHz | 1,382 MHz | 1,455 MHz | 1,188 MHz |
Mem freq | 2,002 MHz | 2,002 MHz | 1,752 MHz | TBA | 1,653 MHz |
Mem size | 6 GB GDDR5 | 3 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 |
mem bus | 192-bit | 192-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit |
TDP | 120W | 120W | 75W | 75W | 90W/75W |
The GeForce GTX 1050 would get you 1.9 TFlops of (single precision) performance with 2.2 TFlops for the GTX 1050 Ti model. Both cards would fit in a 75 Watt TDP and thus will not require an external power connector.
First GeForce GTX 980 Ti Pictures hit the web - 05/23/2015 10:09 AM
The first pictures of NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 980 Ti graphics card have been outed yesterday, the Ti model is the upcoming enthusiast class graphics card from Nvidia....
The First GeForce GTX 980 Benchmarks ? - 09/07/2014 08:52 PM
3DMark scores of a GeForce GTX 980 and 980M SLI have surfaced on the web today, the website Videocardz posted them. Before I continue I want to say that there is no validity of the screen-shots whatso...
Valve Launches First Generation Steam Machines - 01/07/2014 10:03 AM
Valve, creators of best-selling game franchises (such as Counter-Strike, Dota 2, Half-Life, Left 4 Dead, Portal, and Team Fortress) and leading technologies (such as Steam and Source), today announced...
NVIDIA quietly adds first GeForce 300 series chip - 11/27/2009 12:11 PM
In a low-key move during Thanksgiving, NVIDIA has added the first graphics chipset to its GeForce 300 series. The GeForce 310 is a direct replacement for the earlier 210 and (andf thus a rename), like...
Senior Member
Posts: 558
Joined: 2006-05-22
Well 3D Mark 11 is kinda useless to compare performance, I mean the 780TI shows great score and all, but in latest games struggle to beat the 380X which has a much worse score.
I will rather wait for proper review from GURU3D and other sites...
Senior Member
Posts: 8230
Joined: 2010-11-16
That's pretty impressive.
It's almost as fast as a 290 which has an average power consumption of 250 Watt according to the Guru3D tests from a while ago.
It's basically delivering same performance with 3 times less power. Pretty neat.
You'll want to compare it with the same arch. to get the right idea how it stacks. And compared with GTX 1060 it seems to be a huge downgrade performance wise.
Nvidia has been undercutting mid-low range for quite some time. 1060 seems to be a bit of an exception. And likewise 750/ti had been great at what they offered at the time.The rest of it.. mediocre at best
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: 2016-03-24
You'll want to compare it with the same arch. to get the right idea how it stacks. And compared with GTX 1060 it seems to be a huge downgrade performance wise.
Nvidia has been undercutting mid-low range for quite some time. 1060 seems to be a bit of an exception. And likewise 750/ti had been great at what they offered at the time.The rest of it.. mediocre at best
No I don't want to compare it with the same arch. I'm looking at it as an independent piece of technology.
I'm comparing and being impressed by how much performance-per-watt has increased since the 290 generation. Learn to appreciate the small things in life.
Senior Member
Posts: 1303
Joined: 2014-06-15
So this is getting only five hundred more points than an overclocked 950 in 3dmark?. Wow, and people will defend this somehow.
Senior Member
Posts: 7438
Joined: 2012-11-10
You make no logical sense with this statement. You want a $150 card to beat last years $400 card and if it doesn't it sucks.
All it has to best in the 960 which it looks like it does.
Shhh don't feed the trolls...