Powercolor RX 6700 XT Hellhound Spectral White review
Resident Evil Village: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Enermax LIQMAX III aRGB 240mm review
PCIe Resizable BAR Performance AMD and NVIDIA benchmarks
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2021
Intel Core i7 11700KF processor review
Acer Predator Apollo and Predator Talos DRAM Review
ASUS TUF Z590-Plus WIFI review
ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D OC review
Enermax Aquafusion 360 review LCS
First Alleged Benchmark Results GeForce RTX 3080 Surface
Over in Asia a data-set for benchmarks the GeForce RTX 3080 has leaked online. The results are not 100% clear but would be based on the card paired with a system based on a Core i9 10900K processor.
The results have been posted in a video so the charts and data look aa little fuzzy. The tests would have been run with a 456.16 driver. The RTX 3080 would be 30% faster than a 2080 Ti. The set was spotted by videocardz who posted this first. They also mention that this channel where all this was posted has already been caught using fake review samples and publishing a review earlier (they hid the name of the Ryzen processor). This time leakers do not show any review sample, so we cannot confirm if they actually tested the card or have done a bit of 'guestimation'
3DMark Results:
- 3DMark Fire Strike Performance: 31919 (+25% 2080Ti, +43% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: 20101 (+24% 2080Ti, +45% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra: 11049 (+36% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy: 17428 (+28% 2080Ti, +49% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy Extreme: 8548 (+38% 2080Ti, +59% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Port Royal: 11455 (+45% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S )
4K in-game benchmarks. The card appears to be 48 to 62% faster than RTX 2080 SUPER:
- Far Cry 5 +62%
- Borderland 3 +56%
- AC Odyssey +48%
- Forza Horizon 4 +48%
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 5799
Joined: 2004-01-28
Senior Member
Posts: 5799
Joined: 2004-01-28
#5827760 Posted on: 09/09/2020 06:34 PM
I'd say these could be accurate.
I'd say these could be accurate.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 10140
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 10140
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5827765 Posted on: 09/09/2020 06:41 PM
Accurate 'guestimation'?
I'd say these could be accurate.
Accurate 'guestimation'?
They also mention that this channel where all this was posted has already been caught using fake review samples and publishing a review earlier (they hid the name of the Ryzen processor). This time leakers do not show any review sample, so we cannot confirm if they actually tested the card or have done a bit of 'guestimation'
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 15435
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 15435
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5827766 Posted on: 09/09/2020 06:44 PM
Where are those 50-70% first rumors ware showing?
Where are those 50-70% first rumors ware showing?
Wintergreen
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2009-04-29
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2009-04-29
#5827769 Posted on: 09/09/2020 06:48 PM
Those were the nVidia marketing rumours weren't they? Like the ones they paid Digital Foundry to put out?
These new ones look to be about right to me - i.e. somewhere between 25-40% uplift from 2080ti
Where are those 50-70% first rumors ware showing?
Those were the nVidia marketing rumours weren't they? Like the ones they paid Digital Foundry to put out?
These new ones look to be about right to me - i.e. somewhere between 25-40% uplift from 2080ti
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 2007-05-30
Who cares? Cryptominers are going to AGAIN buy all the cards up. There is already photos coming out of Taiwan of people with literal boxes full of them...not even released yet...?????? What BS....