DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
First Alleged Benchmark Results GeForce RTX 3080 Surface
Over in Asia a data-set for benchmarks the GeForce RTX 3080 has leaked online. The results are not 100% clear but would be based on the card paired with a system based on a Core i9 10900K processor.
The results have been posted in a video so the charts and data look aa little fuzzy. The tests would have been run with a 456.16 driver. The RTX 3080 would be 30% faster than a 2080 Ti. The set was spotted by videocardz who posted this first. They also mention that this channel where all this was posted has already been caught using fake review samples and publishing a review earlier (they hid the name of the Ryzen processor). This time leakers do not show any review sample, so we cannot confirm if they actually tested the card or have done a bit of 'guestimation'
3DMark Results:
- 3DMark Fire Strike Performance: 31919 (+25% 2080Ti, +43% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: 20101 (+24% 2080Ti, +45% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra: 11049 (+36% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy: 17428 (+28% 2080Ti, +49% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy Extreme: 8548 (+38% 2080Ti, +59% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Port Royal: 11455 (+45% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S )
4K in-game benchmarks. The card appears to be 48 to 62% faster than RTX 2080 SUPER:
- Far Cry 5 +62%
- Borderland 3 +56%
- AC Odyssey +48%
- Forza Horizon 4 +48%
ViperAnaf
Senior Member
Posts: 404
Joined: 2010-03-07
Senior Member
Posts: 404
Joined: 2010-03-07
#5827863 Posted on: 09/09/2020 09:44 PM
disappointing tbh
disappointing tbh
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 1955
Joined: 2005-08-05
Senior Member
Posts: 1955
Joined: 2005-08-05
#5827868 Posted on: 09/09/2020 09:54 PM
They aren't very accurate for me and my trusty 2080 Ti and i7-10700k. Referring to https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/first-alleged-benchmark-results-geforce-rtx-3080-surface.html
The percentage differences are a off a fair bit for an RTX 2080 Ti! Looking at my results, in general its less than 1% to max 17% difference.
Bit like the Doom Eternal comparison nvidia did (I did the same intro to the boss at max settings 4k and was 20-30fps faster than the el cheapo underclocked 2080ti nvidia used for comparison and damn close to the 3080 side by side).
So, if those results are true for a 3080 it certainly isn't a massive change for most games. Nor would
Here are my random plucked 3DMark scores to show the differences are only 0.5-17%... Running a normal standard fan cooled with power limit % increase in MSI Afterburner (like you should.. yet still runs under 50-70 degrees under load). Asus RTX 2080 Ti OC 11gb with a Intel i7-10700k @ 5ghz
Here are the the scores posted vs my scores with the 3DMark URL .
3DMark Fire Strike Performance: 31919 (+25% 2080Ti, +43% 2080S ) -> 30181 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23188420 mere 0.5% difference, not 25%!
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: 20101 (+24% 2080Ti, +45% 2080S ) 17576 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23188361 (14%)
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra: 11049 (+36% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S ) 9400 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23442247 (17%)
3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy: 17428 (+28% 2080Ti, +49% 2080S ) 15667 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/13196272 (11%)
3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy Extreme: 8548 (+38% 2080Ti, +59% 2080S ) 7259 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/13784438 (17%)
3DMark Fire Strike Port Royal: 11455 (+45% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S ) -> 10129 https://www.3dmark.com/pr/304202 (9%) **certainly not 45% ? da fk****
Don't go selling those 2080 Ti's cheap. Especially for a 3070 with the same type of vram but less. At higher resolutions it will stutter and the 1% will be crud. Learned this when had to sell my 1080 for a 1080 Ti within a week back in the day due to running at 4k and the stutter sucked in games that use graphics like BF1 @ 4k.. not 8k friendly cartoon games like Fortnite.
Nice job!
My timespy score with 10900k and 2080ti: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/13103810
They aren't very accurate for me and my trusty 2080 Ti and i7-10700k. Referring to https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/first-alleged-benchmark-results-geforce-rtx-3080-surface.html
The percentage differences are a off a fair bit for an RTX 2080 Ti! Looking at my results, in general its less than 1% to max 17% difference.
Bit like the Doom Eternal comparison nvidia did (I did the same intro to the boss at max settings 4k and was 20-30fps faster than the el cheapo underclocked 2080ti nvidia used for comparison and damn close to the 3080 side by side).
So, if those results are true for a 3080 it certainly isn't a massive change for most games. Nor would
Here are my random plucked 3DMark scores to show the differences are only 0.5-17%... Running a normal standard fan cooled with power limit % increase in MSI Afterburner (like you should.. yet still runs under 50-70 degrees under load). Asus RTX 2080 Ti OC 11gb with a Intel i7-10700k @ 5ghz
Here are the the scores posted vs my scores with the 3DMark URL .
3DMark Fire Strike Performance: 31919 (+25% 2080Ti, +43% 2080S ) -> 30181 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23188420 mere 0.5% difference, not 25%!
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: 20101 (+24% 2080Ti, +45% 2080S ) 17576 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23188361 (14%)
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra: 11049 (+36% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S ) 9400 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23442247 (17%)
3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy: 17428 (+28% 2080Ti, +49% 2080S ) 15667 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/13196272 (11%)
3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy Extreme: 8548 (+38% 2080Ti, +59% 2080S ) 7259 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/13784438 (17%)
3DMark Fire Strike Port Royal: 11455 (+45% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S ) -> 10129 https://www.3dmark.com/pr/304202 (9%) **certainly not 45% ? da fk****
Don't go selling those 2080 Ti's cheap. Especially for a 3070 with the same type of vram but less. At higher resolutions it will stutter and the 1% will be crud. Learned this when had to sell my 1080 for a 1080 Ti within a week back in the day due to running at 4k and the stutter sucked in games that use graphics like BF1 @ 4k.. not 8k friendly cartoon games like Fortnite.
Nice job!
My timespy score with 10900k and 2080ti: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/13103810
Francesco
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Joined: 2004-03-09
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Joined: 2004-03-09
#5827874 Posted on: 09/09/2020 10:06 PM
I can't figure out how a GPU that is 30% faster than current fastest one and costs half the price could be a disappointment for anyone.... it's something like +160% price per performance. Hoping AMD can do even better but still.. these GPUs look very appealing to me.
I can't figure out how a GPU that is 30% faster than current fastest one and costs half the price could be a disappointment for anyone.... it's something like +160% price per performance. Hoping AMD can do even better but still.. these GPUs look very appealing to me.
SoppingClam
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2020-07-28
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2020-07-28
#5827887 Posted on: 09/09/2020 10:19 PM
Nice job!
My timespy score with 10900k and 2080ti: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/13103810
Well there you go. Your 17,102 with a 2080 ti vs the 3080 at 17,428 is nice, since you are using the same i9-10900k CPU as the benchmarks. Compared to my i7-10700k
When comparing my result with yours (https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/13103810/spy/13803124) you can see that the actual graphic scores are about the same (3.6%) with your fancier CPU but gives a more noticeable bump in the scores for the portions not related to the GPU. Stupid 3DMark
Nice job!
My timespy score with 10900k and 2080ti: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/13103810
Well there you go. Your 17,102 with a 2080 ti vs the 3080 at 17,428 is nice, since you are using the same i9-10900k CPU as the benchmarks. Compared to my i7-10700k
When comparing my result with yours (https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/13103810/spy/13803124) you can see that the actual graphic scores are about the same (3.6%) with your fancier CPU but gives a more noticeable bump in the scores for the portions not related to the GPU. Stupid 3DMark
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2020-07-28
They aren't very accurate for me and my trusty 2080 Ti and i7-10700k. Referring to https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/first-alleged-benchmark-results-geforce-rtx-3080-surface.html
The percentage differences are a off a fair bit for an RTX 2080 Ti! Looking at my results, in general its less than 1% to max 17% difference.
Bit like the Doom Eternal comparison nvidia did (I did the same intro to the boss at max settings 4k and was 20-30fps faster than the el cheapo underclocked 2080ti nvidia used for comparison and damn close to the 3080 side by side).
So, if those results are true for a 3080 it certainly isn't a massive change for most games. Nor would
Here are my random plucked 3DMark scores to show the differences are only 0.5-17%... Running a normal standard fan cooled with power limit % increase in MSI Afterburner (like you should.. yet still runs under 50-70 degrees under load). Asus RTX 2080 Ti OC 11gb with a Intel i7-10700k @ 5ghz
Here are the the scores posted vs my scores with the 3DMark URL .
3DMark Fire Strike Performance: 31919 (+25% 2080Ti, +43% 2080S ) -> 30181 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23188420 mere 0.5% difference, not 25%!
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: 20101 (+24% 2080Ti, +45% 2080S ) 17576 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23188361 (14%)
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra: 11049 (+36% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S ) 9400 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23442247 (17%)
3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy: 17428 (+28% 2080Ti, +49% 2080S ) 15667 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/13196272 (11%)
3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy Extreme: 8548 (+38% 2080Ti, +59% 2080S ) 7259 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/13784438 (17%)
3DMark Fire Strike Port Royal: 11455 (+45% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S ) -> 10129 https://www.3dmark.com/pr/304202 (9%) **certainly not 45% ? da fk****
Don't go selling those 2080 Ti's cheap. Especially for a 3070 with the same type of vram but less. At higher resolutions it will stutter and the 1% will be crud. Learned this when had to sell my 1080 for a 1080 Ti within a week back in the day due to running at 4k and the stutter sucked in games that use graphics like BF1 @ 4k.. not 8k friendly cartoon games like Fortnite.