First Alleged Benchmark Results GeForce RTX 3080 Surface
Over in Asia a data-set for benchmarks the GeForce RTX 3080 has leaked online. The results are not 100% clear but would be based on the card paired with a system based on a Core i9 10900K processor.
The results have been posted in a video so the charts and data look aa little fuzzy. The tests would have been run with a 456.16 driver. The RTX 3080 would be 30% faster than a 2080 Ti. The set was spotted by videocardz who posted this first. They also mention that this channel where all this was posted has already been caught using fake review samples and publishing a review earlier (they hid the name of the Ryzen processor). This time leakers do not show any review sample, so we cannot confirm if they actually tested the card or have done a bit of 'guestimation'
3DMark Results:
- 3DMark Fire Strike Performance: 31919 (+25% 2080Ti, +43% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: 20101 (+24% 2080Ti, +45% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra: 11049 (+36% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy: 17428 (+28% 2080Ti, +49% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy Extreme: 8548 (+38% 2080Ti, +59% 2080S )
- 3DMark Fire Strike Port Royal: 11455 (+45% 2080Ti, +64% 2080S )
4K in-game benchmarks. The card appears to be 48 to 62% faster than RTX 2080 SUPER:
- Far Cry 5 +62%
- Borderland 3 +56%
- AC Odyssey +48%
- Forza Horizon 4 +48%
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 2017-05-09
That's the rough estimate I'm hoping for with the 3080ti as well, least coming from a 1080ti.
The 3080ti is the one I hope to upgrade to and it should come out in 6 months, though I've been hearing rumors over on reddit that nvidia might try to release it before years end. With the new AMD announcement today, there could be some truth to that...
Senior Member
Posts: 16410
Joined: 2004-08-18
The 3080 Ti will be a cutdown 3090 with, if rumours are true, half the VRAM (so 12 GB) but it remains to be seen just how much faster the 3090 is over the 3080. It may not be as much as the price difference between the 3080 and 3090 would suggest...
Anyway, a 50% on average performance improvement over the RTX 2080 Super which itself is slightly faster than 1080 Ti is good enough for me. While commonsense is telling me to wait for the 3080 Ti even if it will cost nearer £1,000, I still think the 3080 might be a better buy for me as someone who plays games at 1440p and will be for the next few years at least. The 3080 is also more reasonably priced at £649, less than the 1080 Ti I bought three and a half years ago which has ended up being the best GPU I have ever bought. At this point I will almost certainly be getting a 3080 in the next few weeks as I feel the time is now right for a new card that supports RTX and DLSS, things I have not been able to use (well, I can use RTX on my 1080 Ti but not at a playable framerates unless I drop the resolution to chunk-o-vision mode!!!).
Senior Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2005-08-05
A few more posts, and you have 13370 posts

You are on fire

Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-01-09
If I'm not going to spend my money to 3090, there's no point of upgrading 2080ti to 3080 really (not going to sell my old card), especially if games are running in 2K and not 4K.
Better save all that money to 4xxx series or whatever is coming from the Intel and AMD. Only games will really tell do I really need to upgrade my stuff.
Senior Member
Posts: 128
Joined: 2014-07-04
Those were the nVidia marketing rumours weren't they? Like the ones they paid Digital Foundry to put out?
These new ones look to be about right to me - i.e. somewhere between 25-40% uplift from 2080ti
Remember this is RTX3080 not a Ti and 25-45 % faster than 2080Ti which is great and it would be 65% if it was RTX3080Ti.