HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB 32GB 2933 MHz review
Nvidia Turing GeForce 2080 (Ti) architecture review
Ballistix Sport AT Gaming DDR4 RGB 32GB 3000 MHz review
Seagate Barracuda Pro 14TB HDD review
ASUS ROG STRIX B450-I Gaming review
Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks
MSI MEG X399 Creation review
be quiet! Silent Base 601 review
Deepcool Gamerstorm Castle 240 RGB AIO review
Strange Brigade: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Final Fantasy XV Official Site shows 2080 and 2080Ti Benchmark Results
So if you browse the Final Fantasy XV website, their benchmark results set is showing new entries at 2560x1440 and 3840x2160. The scores shown here are the average values calculated for the various GPUs.
The resulting aggregate scores may be affected by the specifications for the CPUs, memory and graphics drivers etc. used in individual tests. These scores are for reference purposes only and do not constitute a guarantee to the performance when running the release version of the game, at least that is what is stated on the page.
Click the thumbnails below.
Creative Chosen as official Final Fantasy XV Recommended Gear - 03/15/2018 08:56 AM
Creative Technology announced that Sound BlasterX H7 Tournament Edition headset, H5 Tournament Edition headset, Vanguard K08 keyboard and Siege M04 mouse have officially been recommended for Square En...
Unprotected version of Final Fantasy XV loads faster - 03/13/2018 09:03 AM
The unprotected version of Final Fantasy XV runs better than the Steam version. For this comparison dso gaming used an Intel i7 4930K (overclocked at 4.2Ghz) with 8GB RAM, NVIDIA’s GTX980Ti,...
Benchmark review: Final Fantasy XV for Windows PC (Updated) - 03/06/2018 09:39 AM
We check out and benchmark the PC version of Final Fantasy XV / 15 (2018) for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics car...
Final Fantasy XV has been cracked two days before its even released - 03/05/2018 02:36 PM
It's a bit of af a mess, so remember the PC demo of Final Fantasy XV from last week? As it seems, it was an unprotected release. A Chinese crack group called "3DM" simply used the .exe f...
Final Fantasy XV demo for PC is out - 02/27/2018 09:34 AM
Square Enix has released a demo for the PC version of Final Fantasy XV. This demo is 20GB in size and will feature the first Chapter and will allow players to fully explore the tutorial and opening qu...
Irenicus
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 2015-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 2015-05-03
#5585074 Posted on: 09/16/2018 09:39 AM
Only slightly faster than titan v at 4k... hardly surprising. And only 32 % faster than 1080 ti... glad i cancelled my preorder.
I will wait for the node shrink with the 3000 series, should bring a much bigger performance increase.
Only? LMAO
Only slightly faster than titan v at 4k... hardly surprising. And only 32 % faster than 1080 ti... glad i cancelled my preorder.
I will wait for the node shrink with the 3000 series, should bring a much bigger performance increase.
Only? LMAO
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5585077 Posted on: 09/16/2018 09:57 AM
Yes, only. It's the smallest performance increase going from the top chip of the previous generation, to the top chip of the next generation since going from 480 to 580. 780 ti to 980 ti was a 50-60 % performance increase. Going from 980 ti to 1080 ti was a 60-70 % performance increase. So a 32 % performance increase is quite meager to say the least.
Only? LMAO
Yes, only. It's the smallest performance increase going from the top chip of the previous generation, to the top chip of the next generation since going from 480 to 580. 780 ti to 980 ti was a 50-60 % performance increase. Going from 980 ti to 1080 ti was a 60-70 % performance increase. So a 32 % performance increase is quite meager to say the least.
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 6928
Joined: 2014-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6928
Joined: 2014-09-27
#5585079 Posted on: 09/16/2018 10:03 AM
This will most likely increase close to 40% as NVIDIA matures the driver, and I completely speculate that it will be even larger in titles with proper DX12/Vulkan support.
I wouldn't get it still, as this feels like an architecture severely limited by the 16nm stagnation we go through.
This will most likely increase close to 40% as NVIDIA matures the driver, and I completely speculate that it will be even larger in titles with proper DX12/Vulkan support.
I wouldn't get it still, as this feels like an architecture severely limited by the 16nm stagnation we go through.
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5585083 Posted on: 09/16/2018 10:10 AM
This will most likely increase close to 40% as NVIDIA matures the driver, and I completely speculate that it will be even larger in titles with proper DX12/Vulkan support.
I wouldn't get it still, as this feels like an architecture severely limited by the 16nm stagnation we go through.
It will possibly increase with newer drivers, but the increase from 1080 ti to 2080 ti is still amongst the smallest ever.
And yeah, i reckon things will really change on 7nm aswell.
This will most likely increase close to 40% as NVIDIA matures the driver, and I completely speculate that it will be even larger in titles with proper DX12/Vulkan support.
I wouldn't get it still, as this feels like an architecture severely limited by the 16nm stagnation we go through.
It will possibly increase with newer drivers, but the increase from 1080 ti to 2080 ti is still amongst the smallest ever.
And yeah, i reckon things will really change on 7nm aswell.
Irenicus
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 2015-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 2015-05-03
#5585091 Posted on: 09/16/2018 10:46 AM
Not really. it's to be expected actually. It's not meager at all. It's still quite significant. The way we see increases in performance is bound to start to taper off and we're seeing that in the last few years. Performance increase isn't going to be exponential, quite the opposite. Moore's law no longer applies or didn't you know?
Yes, only. It's the smallest performance increase going from the top chip of the previous generation, to the top chip of the next generation since going from 480 to 580. 780 ti to 980 ti was a 50-60 % performance increase. Going from 980 ti to 1080 ti was a 60-70 % performance increase. So a 32 % performance increase is quite meager to say the least.
Not really. it's to be expected actually. It's not meager at all. It's still quite significant. The way we see increases in performance is bound to start to taper off and we're seeing that in the last few years. Performance increase isn't going to be exponential, quite the opposite. Moore's law no longer applies or didn't you know?
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 7316
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 7316
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5585094 Posted on: 09/16/2018 10:54 AM
Well, for someone who games on regular monitor with usual features, there is not so big gain.
But if someone aims exclusively on new features like HDR and others which nVidia purposely shown in "marketing" materials, then gains are quite good due to older generation having excessive impact from them.
Question is: does someone wants this kind of improvement well above usual price?
Usually new generation replaced older in similar price with tiny bump at worst. But now old generation is around MSRP and on top of them there is new generation.
Considering that GTX 1080Ti was premium priced product... What are those GPUs now? Ultra premium?
When GPU costs same as CPU, MB, RAM, M.2 NVMe drive together or more... It really makes you think.
Well, for someone who games on regular monitor with usual features, there is not so big gain.
But if someone aims exclusively on new features like HDR and others which nVidia purposely shown in "marketing" materials, then gains are quite good due to older generation having excessive impact from them.
Question is: does someone wants this kind of improvement well above usual price?
Usually new generation replaced older in similar price with tiny bump at worst. But now old generation is around MSRP and on top of them there is new generation.
Considering that GTX 1080Ti was premium priced product... What are those GPUs now? Ultra premium?
When GPU costs same as CPU, MB, RAM, M.2 NVMe drive together or more... It really makes you think.
H1TMANza
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2016-01-21
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2016-01-21
#5585097 Posted on: 09/16/2018 11:06 AM
I'll wait till theres an exact 100% performance improvement before I upgrade, i've always used this logic when upgrading parts.
I'll wait till theres an exact 100% performance improvement before I upgrade, i've always used this logic when upgrading parts.
zipper
Senior Member
Posts: 935
Joined: 2005-03-14
Senior Member
Posts: 935
Joined: 2005-03-14
#5585103 Posted on: 09/16/2018 11:25 AM
Ditto, on laptops that I only use. The last update yet was 400% after 5 years, must say it was noticeable...
Ditto, on laptops that I only use. The last update yet was 400% after 5 years, must say it was noticeable...
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 434
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 434
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5585104 Posted on: 09/16/2018 11:26 AM
Don't forget, for (almost)* double the price.
So a 32 % performance increase is quite meager to say the least.
Don't forget, for (almost)* double the price.
*depends where one lives, in some cases it's more than double.
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5585107 Posted on: 09/16/2018 11:35 AM
Yes, only. The 1070 beat the 980 Ti by 13-14% for nearly half the price and the 1080 was ahead of the 980Ti by ~37-38% for the same price. The 2080 will be 5-15% faster in games for an extra 50-100$. Not to speak of the 1080Ti-2080Ti difference.
It was even more. Around 76% in 1440P and 83% in 4K.
Only? LMAO
Yes, only. The 1070 beat the 980 Ti by 13-14% for nearly half the price and the 1080 was ahead of the 980Ti by ~37-38% for the same price. The 2080 will be 5-15% faster in games for an extra 50-100$. Not to speak of the 1080Ti-2080Ti difference.
Going from 980 ti to 1080 ti was a 60-70 % performance increase. So a 32 % performance increase is quite meager to say the least.
It was even more. Around 76% in 1440P and 83% in 4K.
HWgeek
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2005-04-04
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2005-04-04
#5585110 Posted on: 09/16/2018 11:42 AM
RTX 2080 should be compared with 1080 TI-Right?
RTX 2080 should be compared with 1080 TI-Right?
Anarion
Senior Member
Posts: 13263
Joined: 2005-08-13
Senior Member
Posts: 13263
Joined: 2005-08-13
#5585111 Posted on: 09/16/2018 11:44 AM
This will most likely increase close to 40% as NVIDIA matures the driver, and I completely speculate that it will be even larger in titles with proper DX12/Vulkan support.
I wouldn't get it still, as this feels like an architecture severely limited by the 16nm stagnation we go through.
Yeah, this is would benefit from switch to 7nm. The tensor and RT cores make the silicon so much larger that the price is high. It's really large and complex chip.
This will most likely increase close to 40% as NVIDIA matures the driver, and I completely speculate that it will be even larger in titles with proper DX12/Vulkan support.
I wouldn't get it still, as this feels like an architecture severely limited by the 16nm stagnation we go through.
Yeah, this is would benefit from switch to 7nm. The tensor and RT cores make the silicon so much larger that the price is high. It's really large and complex chip.
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5585115 Posted on: 09/16/2018 12:02 PM
Moore's law doesn't apply, as there are several ways of getting around it. Firstly they can still do additional node shrinks, and secondly (and most importantly) they are working on combining several chips for gpu's in the same way amd combine chips with threadripper. This would enable them to still increase performance tenfold over the performance we have now, architectural improvements, aswell as improvements to rendering techniques excluded.
Not really. it's to be expected actually. It's not meager at all. It's still quite significant. The way we see increases in performance is bound to start to taper off and we're seeing that in the last few years. Performance increase isn't going to be exponential, quite the opposite. Moore's law no longer applies or didn't you know?
Moore's law doesn't apply, as there are several ways of getting around it. Firstly they can still do additional node shrinks, and secondly (and most importantly) they are working on combining several chips for gpu's in the same way amd combine chips with threadripper. This would enable them to still increase performance tenfold over the performance we have now, architectural improvements, aswell as improvements to rendering techniques excluded.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 7316
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 7316
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5585124 Posted on: 09/16/2018 12:53 PM
Remember, we are paying for wafer space. Putting 3x 300mm^2 on interposer or use 1x 900mm^2 will improve cost only by difference in wasted space by low yield of larger chips.
It works well for AMD's Ryzen. Will likely work well for GPUs. But having 2x 400mm^2 GPU will cost double of what one 400mm^2 chip will.
(Apparently it will not result in double prices on graphics cards, as chips make only fraction of final price.)
Moore's law doesn't apply, as there are several ways of getting around it. Firstly they can still do additional node shrinks, and secondly (and most importantly) they are working on combining several chips for gpu's in the same way amd combine chips with threadripper. This would enable them to still increase performance tenfold over the performance we have now, architectural improvements, aswell as improvements to rendering techniques excluded.
Remember, we are paying for wafer space. Putting 3x 300mm^2 on interposer or use 1x 900mm^2 will improve cost only by difference in wasted space by low yield of larger chips.
It works well for AMD's Ryzen. Will likely work well for GPUs. But having 2x 400mm^2 GPU will cost double of what one 400mm^2 chip will.
(Apparently it will not result in double prices on graphics cards, as chips make only fraction of final price.)
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 2017-11-23
Only slightly faster than titan v at 4k... hardly surprising. And only 32 % faster than 1080 ti... glad i cancelled my preorder.
I will wait for the node shrink with the 3000 series, should bring a much bigger performance increase.