Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti performance Leaks in Ashes of the Singularity
Leakbench (twitter usuer) reveals the first benchmark of the GeForce Ti 3070 RTX in Ashes of the Singularity (AOTS).
Preset in High quality and accompanied by an AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, this GPU achieves a performance of 150, 102 and 90 FPS at resolutions 1080p, 1440p and 2160p , respectively. Compared to its younger sister, the GeForce RTX 3070, the new graphics card gets 9% more performance at 1440p. You can see the detail of each test below.
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti will be equipped with the GA104-400 graphics chip, equipped with 6144 CUDA Cores (256 more than the RTX 3070), 192 TMUs / Tensor Core, 96 ROPs and 48 RT Cores, accompanied by 8 GB of memory. GDDR6X at 19 GHz which, together with a 256-bit memory interface, provides a bandwidth of 608 GB/s. This new GPU is expected to offer 50% more performance than its predecessor , the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, as revealed by NVIDIA in its presentation. Finally, it will go on sale for $599 (suggested price) next Thursday, June 10.
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 4984
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 4984
Joined: 2020-08-03
#5918027 Posted on: 06/05/2021 08:16 AM
that would be true,if there was a better alternative.
at this point no card available comes with absolutely no tradeoffs when it comes to specs and performance except for 3090 and 3080Ti
16g g6x,not g6
rt+dlss and all the bells and whistles,otherwise what is the point of getting a huge pool of vram if you're not gonna be able to hit acceptable fps with ray tracing fps anyway
stay away from 3060 too,it's not a great card.it isn't bad,but really,this should be $280 not $350 or $1000
Only a madman would spend that much on a 8gb card in 2021.
that would be true,if there was a better alternative.
at this point no card available comes with absolutely no tradeoffs when it comes to specs and performance except for 3090 and 3080Ti
I really want my next card to have at least 12gb
16g g6x,not g6
rt+dlss and all the bells and whistles,otherwise what is the point of getting a huge pool of vram if you're not gonna be able to hit acceptable fps with ray tracing fps anyway
stay away from 3060 too,it's not a great card.it isn't bad,but really,this should be $280 not $350 or $1000
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 5872
Joined: 2004-01-28
Senior Member
Posts: 5872
Joined: 2004-01-28
#5918070 Posted on: 06/05/2021 11:33 AM
Only a madman would care about the memory of a card, rather then the performance of said card.
If there was a card that was 10 times faster then a RTX 3090, but only had 8GB of memory, you better believe, i'd be getting it. Memory only matters as far as the performance is degraded from it, aka performance is always what matters in the end. Buy performance, not make-believe reasons to require more memory.
yes, you absolutely had better performance, because: IT WAS A FASTER CARD.
The 7600 GT with 256mb of ram was faster then the 6800 with 256mb of ram (it came in both 128mb of 256mb). Had nothing to do with the 128mb vs 256, it had everything to do with the fact that the 7000 series was a decent leap over the 6000 series.
If the 7600 GT you had gotten had only 128mb of ram, you would have noticed the same, better, performance.
Do your research, find out if too "little" ram on a GPU will actually affect you at all (8GB is not currently even affecting 4K games in any decent amount) and buy what is right for you based off of PERFORMANCE.
You couldn't be more wrong. Obviously you weren't gaming at the time I was referring to. In the current state of gaming 8 and even 6gb is fine for high end gaming, but like I said with the new consoles system requirements are gonna go up. Just like when the Xbone and PS4 released, 2gb GPU's started lacking in performance very fast. I understand there's no point in putting a ton of memory on a GPU if it doesn't have the horsepower to back it up. Do you think I just started posting here yesterday?
that would be true,if there was a better alternative.
at this point no card available comes with absolutely no tradeoffs when it comes to specs and performance except for 3090 and 3080Ti
16g g6x,not g6
rt+dlss and all the bells and whistles,otherwise what is the point of getting a huge pool of vram if you're not gonna be able to hit acceptable fps with ray tracing fps anyway
stay away from 3060 too,it's not a great card.it isn't bad,but really,this should be $280 not $350 or $1000
You're right, it should be $299 at the most, but at this point the pricing is just insane and I'd be happy to get any GPU at the actual MSRP right now.
Only a madman would care about the memory of a card, rather then the performance of said card.
If there was a card that was 10 times faster then a RTX 3090, but only had 8GB of memory, you better believe, i'd be getting it. Memory only matters as far as the performance is degraded from it, aka performance is always what matters in the end. Buy performance, not make-believe reasons to require more memory.
yes, you absolutely had better performance, because: IT WAS A FASTER CARD.
The 7600 GT with 256mb of ram was faster then the 6800 with 256mb of ram (it came in both 128mb of 256mb). Had nothing to do with the 128mb vs 256, it had everything to do with the fact that the 7000 series was a decent leap over the 6000 series.
If the 7600 GT you had gotten had only 128mb of ram, you would have noticed the same, better, performance.
Do your research, find out if too "little" ram on a GPU will actually affect you at all (8GB is not currently even affecting 4K games in any decent amount) and buy what is right for you based off of PERFORMANCE.
You couldn't be more wrong. Obviously you weren't gaming at the time I was referring to. In the current state of gaming 8 and even 6gb is fine for high end gaming, but like I said with the new consoles system requirements are gonna go up. Just like when the Xbone and PS4 released, 2gb GPU's started lacking in performance very fast. I understand there's no point in putting a ton of memory on a GPU if it doesn't have the horsepower to back it up. Do you think I just started posting here yesterday?
that would be true,if there was a better alternative.
at this point no card available comes with absolutely no tradeoffs when it comes to specs and performance except for 3090 and 3080Ti
16g g6x,not g6
rt+dlss and all the bells and whistles,otherwise what is the point of getting a huge pool of vram if you're not gonna be able to hit acceptable fps with ray tracing fps anyway
stay away from 3060 too,it's not a great card.it isn't bad,but really,this should be $280 not $350 or $1000
You're right, it should be $299 at the most, but at this point the pricing is just insane and I'd be happy to get any GPU at the actual MSRP right now.
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 4984
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 4984
Joined: 2020-08-03
#5918072 Posted on: 06/05/2021 11:50 AM
You couldn't be more wrong. Obviously you weren't gaming at the time I was referring to. In the current state of gaming 8 and even 6gb is fine for high end gaming, but like I said with the new consoles system requirements are gonna go up. Just like when the Xbone and PS4 released, 2gb GPU's started lacking in performance very fast. I understand there's no point in putting a ton of memory on a GPU if it doesn't have the horsepower to back it up. Do you think I just started posting here yesterday?
You're right, it should be $299 at the most, but at this point the pricing is just insane and I'd be happy to get any GPU at the actual MSRP right now.
it has to have a balance
you don't wanna choose between one shortage or the other
just get something that has all ends covered,or else don't,especially given how much cards cost.
and don't get 3070ti especially
I would understand getting 3080ti a lot more and frankly I think all those yt channels that make it into worst launch ever are just desperate.
it's a lot of money,but it's the cheapest one that has you covered for years.
3080 - maybe,but 10g is not that much over 8g.plus it's 10% more performance.it's not good value like 980ti/1080ti,but I don't think anybody getting 3080ti is gonna complain about any aspect of its performance or lack of features in foreseeable future.
that said,I'd rather get a 3080 and upgrade than pay that much premium for 3080ti.
You couldn't be more wrong. Obviously you weren't gaming at the time I was referring to. In the current state of gaming 8 and even 6gb is fine for high end gaming, but like I said with the new consoles system requirements are gonna go up. Just like when the Xbone and PS4 released, 2gb GPU's started lacking in performance very fast. I understand there's no point in putting a ton of memory on a GPU if it doesn't have the horsepower to back it up. Do you think I just started posting here yesterday?
You're right, it should be $299 at the most, but at this point the pricing is just insane and I'd be happy to get any GPU at the actual MSRP right now.
it has to have a balance
you don't wanna choose between one shortage or the other
just get something that has all ends covered,or else don't,especially given how much cards cost.
and don't get 3070ti especially
I would understand getting 3080ti a lot more and frankly I think all those yt channels that make it into worst launch ever are just desperate.
it's a lot of money,but it's the cheapest one that has you covered for years.
3080 - maybe,but 10g is not that much over 8g.plus it's 10% more performance.it's not good value like 980ti/1080ti,but I don't think anybody getting 3080ti is gonna complain about any aspect of its performance or lack of features in foreseeable future.
that said,I'd rather get a 3080 and upgrade than pay that much premium for 3080ti.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 18857
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 18857
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5918082 Posted on: 06/05/2021 12:10 PM
that would be true,if there was a better alternative.
at this point no card available comes with absolutely no tradeoffs when it comes to specs and performance except for 3090 and 3080Ti
16g g6x,not g6
rt+dlss and all the bells and whistles,otherwise what is the point of getting a huge pool of vram if you're not gonna be able to hit acceptable fps with ray tracing fps anyway
stay away from 3060 too,it's not a great card.it isn't bad,but really,this should be $280 not $350 or $1000
Even the 16G6 helps in many games. Whats the point having super fast G6X when you have only 8GB of it?
If the msrp is real 330$ for a 3060 thats great deal i think and i would most definitely consider one.
that would be true,if there was a better alternative.
at this point no card available comes with absolutely no tradeoffs when it comes to specs and performance except for 3090 and 3080Ti
16g g6x,not g6
rt+dlss and all the bells and whistles,otherwise what is the point of getting a huge pool of vram if you're not gonna be able to hit acceptable fps with ray tracing fps anyway
stay away from 3060 too,it's not a great card.it isn't bad,but really,this should be $280 not $350 or $1000
Even the 16G6 helps in many games. Whats the point having super fast G6X when you have only 8GB of it?
If the msrp is real 330$ for a 3060 thats great deal i think and i would most definitely consider one.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 8305
Joined: 2008-07-31
Only a madman would care about the memory of a card, rather then the performance of said card.
If there was a card that was 10 times faster then a RTX 3090, but only had 8GB of memory, you better believe, i'd be getting it. Memory only matters as far as the performance is degraded from it, aka performance is always what matters in the end. Buy performance, not make-believe reasons to require more memory.
yes, you absolutely had better performance, because: IT WAS A FASTER CARD.
The 7600 GT with 256mb of ram was faster then the 6800 with 256mb of ram (it came in both 128mb of 256mb). Had nothing to do with the 128mb vs 256, it had everything to do with the fact that the 7000 series was a decent leap over the 6000 series.
If the 7600 GT you had gotten had only 128mb of ram, you would have noticed the same, better, performance.
Do your research, find out if too "little" ram on a GPU will actually affect you at all (8GB is not currently even affecting 4K games in any decent amount) and buy what is right for you based off of PERFORMANCE.