Far Cry Primal Benchmark Review Updated

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/02/2016 05:09 PM | source: | 6 comment(s)

Yesterday we posted our preliminary Far Cry Primal graphics performance article. Yesterday evening we already added results for different quality modes and some CPU core scaling. I have just updated the article with Multi-GPU rendering results. We measure both with the normal benchmark, yet also look at frame-times and thus latency.

At the following link I'll drop you straight to the two extra pages with Multi-GPU results.

Related Stories

Review: Far Cry Primal PC graphics card performance benchmarks - 03/01/2016 05:59 PM
We take a look at Far Cry Primal in our usual in-depth ways with roughly 20 graphics cards. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/N...

Far Cry Primal - The Charge - Live Trailer - 02/05/2016 09:18 AM
Charge in the battle for humanity's survival, where your instinct will be your most reliable weapon. ...

Far Cry Primal - King of the Stone Age Video - 01/21/2016 09:39 AM
Far Cry Primal is quite unlike any of the previous games in the series, as it throws you back to prehistoric times, when humans lived in primitive tribes and when woolly mammoths and sabre-tooth tiger...

Far Cry Primal - Gameplay Reveal Trailer - 12/04/2015 07:47 AM
Ubisoft's forthcoming action-adventure release with Far Cry Primal shows fans of the series never-before-seen gameplay footage at this year's Game Awards....

Far Cry 4 - PC Patch 1.8.0 - 02/05/2015 09:28 AM
Ubisoft has released a new update for the PC version of Far Cry 4. This update will be auto-downloaded from Steam or UPLAY, and you can view its complete changelog below:...

2 pages 1 2

SA SYS
Member

Posts: 81
Joined: 2014-10-04

#5238780 Posted on: 03/02/2016 01:33 PM

nice job hh

good optimised ... fury in CF is awesome!!!!!

but about the game .... i think far cry 2 & 4 & primal are crap games!

i want something like far cry 1 . . . cryteck god bless you!

xIcarus
Senior Member

Posts: 946
Joined: 2010-08-24

#5238848 Posted on: 03/02/2016 03:26 PM

Holy crap. 980SLI absolutely demolishes FuryCFX in 1440p, but in 4k the FuryCFX destroys 980SLI.

I mean I expected a difference, sure, but isn't this abnormal?

Keesberenburg
Senior Member

Posts: 852
Joined: 2013-01-11

#5238858 Posted on: 03/02/2016 03:41 PM

Jups thats strance, i think it have to do with vram, nvida gtx 980 ti eats 6gb 1080p and 390x 4,2 al the time what ever the resolution is on that moment. Ithnik Nvida have some memory leak?

GeniusPr0
Senior Member

Posts: 1249
Joined: 2003-04-26

#5238933 Posted on: 03/02/2016 05:20 PM

Oh my, that CFX Fury setup took almost no hit. It's almost like it was tickled a bit. I wonder if an O/C would make up the <60 avg.

Obviously CPU overhead with AMD drivers.

GeniusPr0
Senior Member

Posts: 1249
Joined: 2003-04-26

#5238934 Posted on: 03/02/2016 05:21 PM

Jups thats strance, i think it have to do with vram, nvida gtx 980 ti eats 6gb 1080p and 390x 4,2 al the time what ever the resolution is on that moment. Ithnik Nvida have some memory leak?

Nothing to do with vRAM. Hilbert covered vRAM. It's to do with AMD's history with CPU overhead.

2 pages 1 2

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.