Guru3D Thermal Paste Roundup 2019
Back-to-school Microsoft Office 2016 $18 Win 10 Pro $12
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan 1TB SSD Review
Corsair K57 RGB Wireless keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
EVGA GeForce GTX 780 SuperClocked ACX review
Today we test and review a GeForce GTX 780 from EVGA, the SC ACX edition specifically. The Superclocked model comes with a nice factory tweak and that all new ball bearing fan based ACX cooler. Overall the card is almost as fast as a GeForce GTX Titan, 100% cool and 100% silent. We test the product with the hottest games like Metro: Last light, Battlefield 3, Sleeping Dogs, Far Cry 3, Medal of Honor Warfighter, Hitman Absolution and many more.
Read the article right here.
EVGA GeForce GTX 780 and EVGA ACX Cooler - 05/23/2013 03:57 PM
The EVGA GeForce GTX 780 marks an evolution in gaming performance – an insanely fast, smooth, and whisper-quiet experience, every time. EVGA is also introducing a brand new cooling design; t...
EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost SC edition tested reviewed - 04/02/2013 08:31 AM
Check out the EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost SC edition review with that SC for superclocked. The product is fairly reference looking but does come with EVGA's own styled cooler, it has 2GB of memory ...
EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti - 10/09/2012 01:40 PM
Turbocharge your experience with the powerful performance of the EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and enjoy the latest games in full 1080P HD with this next-generation NVIDIA Kepler architecture-based GPU.
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 SC review - 09/17/2012 07:10 AM
We review the EVGA GeForce GTX 660 SC aka SuperClocked edition. as the name implies it is already factory overclocked for you with a 1046 MHz baseclock that can boost towards 1111 MHz. We are sure you...
EVGA GeForce GTX 680 Classified 4GB with EVBOT review - 08/04/2012 07:11 AM
We'll test the EVGA GeForce GTX 680 Classified today. A product that is 100% customized from PCB to cooling. Software voltage regulation works, but obviously as well is limited to that 1.175V. EVGA h...
Texter
Senior Member
Posts: 2923
Joined: 2008-11-03
Senior Member
Posts: 2923
Joined: 2008-11-03
#4603644 Posted on: 05/24/2013 06:59 PM
For those interested it's a good idea to dive deep into THG's 2013 workstation charts. THG already had a Titan specific workstation review last month...
For those interested it's a good idea to dive deep into THG's 2013 workstation charts. THG already had a Titan specific workstation review last month...
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16305
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 16305
Joined: 2012-05-18
#4603672 Posted on: 05/24/2013 07:30 PM
Its even worse if you look their OpenCL benchmark with DP...
It was to expect, they have restrict DP to 1/24 ( like 680).
Now on benchmark who dont forcibly use DP.. things are a bit better. ( at least between 580 > 780 )
Yeah it should be better by SP since it has 4tflops vs ~ 1.7tflops by 580GTX.
Its even worse if you look their OpenCL benchmark with DP...
It was to expect, they have restrict DP to 1/24 ( like 680).
Now on benchmark who dont forcibly use DP.. things are a bit better. ( at least between 580 > 780 )
Yeah it should be better by SP since it has 4tflops vs ~ 1.7tflops by 580GTX.
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1232
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1232
Joined: 2003-04-26
#4603956 Posted on: 05/25/2013 01:21 AM
Well I stand corrected. Those temperatures are absolutely INSANE. What's the weight of the EVGA heatsink?
Well I stand corrected. Those temperatures are absolutely INSANE. What's the weight of the EVGA heatsink?
Rugburn
Senior Member
Posts: 131
Joined: 2003-03-09
Senior Member
Posts: 131
Joined: 2003-03-09
#4604054 Posted on: 05/25/2013 04:52 AM
Cant wait to get my hands on three of these.... With 3gb of vram, I shouldn't run into any issues with triple 1080p 120hz monitors.
Cant wait to get my hands on three of these.... With 3gb of vram, I shouldn't run into any issues with triple 1080p 120hz monitors.
mohiuddin
Senior Member
Posts: 753
Joined: 2010-11-06
Senior Member
Posts: 753
Joined: 2010-11-06
#4604055 Posted on: 05/25/2013 04:52 AM
@Hillbert ,
on 'overclocking' page under 'original' the boost clock is 9006mhz.
Nice review by the way.
@Hillbert ,
on 'overclocking' page under 'original' the boost clock is 9006mhz.
Nice review by the way.
PhoBos82
Member
Posts: 33
Joined: 2013-05-04
Member
Posts: 33
Joined: 2013-05-04
#4604699 Posted on: 05/26/2013 05:06 AM
Still confused about the launch of the $1k Titan just to have this card be released soon after with similar performance at a much lower cost.
Still confused about the launch of the $1k Titan just to have this card be released soon after with similar performance at a much lower cost.
Bentez
Senior Member
Posts: 1307
Joined: 2008-12-28
Senior Member
Posts: 1307
Joined: 2008-12-28
#4604812 Posted on: 05/26/2013 12:31 PM
They did the same with 680 release only to bring out the 670 a month later. I guess it makes the 780 look like a better deal compared to a titan even if it is £549 ..
They did the same with 680 release only to bring out the 670 a month later. I guess it makes the 780 look like a better deal compared to a titan even if it is £549 ..
Texter
Senior Member
Posts: 2923
Joined: 2008-11-03
Senior Member
Posts: 2923
Joined: 2008-11-03
#4604825 Posted on: 05/26/2013 12:54 PM
The 780 GPUs were piling up in the bins because they're not sold as a Tesla part, Titan may look like a profitable part at $1k but the Tesla K20X costs EIGHT times as much, hence is way more profitable per GPU. Like nVidia have told us, they were amazed to sell that many Titans in such a short period. So not only do they prefer selling $7-8k Teslas over $1k Titans, but also left-over, third rate silicon 'junk' as $650 780s. And it's funny to see the junk keep up with the big boy when half its die is completely dead. Talk about wasted silicon.
Prices at IBM:
14 SMX Tesla K20X= $7,399 = $1k Titan
13 SMX Tesla K20 = $4,975 = no Geforce
12 SMX LEFTOVER = $650 Geforce 780
Let's just assume the 12SMX part was already on the original Kepler roadmap as the 760 or something...
The 780 GPUs were piling up in the bins because they're not sold as a Tesla part, Titan may look like a profitable part at $1k but the Tesla K20X costs EIGHT times as much, hence is way more profitable per GPU. Like nVidia have told us, they were amazed to sell that many Titans in such a short period. So not only do they prefer selling $7-8k Teslas over $1k Titans, but also left-over, third rate silicon 'junk' as $650 780s. And it's funny to see the junk keep up with the big boy when half its die is completely dead. Talk about wasted silicon.
Prices at IBM:
14 SMX Tesla K20X= $7,399 = $1k Titan
13 SMX Tesla K20 = $4,975 = no Geforce
12 SMX LEFTOVER = $650 Geforce 780
Let's just assume the 12SMX part was already on the original Kepler roadmap as the 760 or something...
yasamoka
Senior Member
Posts: 4711
Joined: 2009-08-29
Senior Member
Posts: 4711
Joined: 2009-08-29
#4604849 Posted on: 05/26/2013 02:04 PM
Yields. And then some artificial pricing, and you're good to go.
Still confused about the launch of the $1k Titan just to have this card be released soon after with similar performance at a much lower cost.
They did the same with 680 release only to bring out the 670 a month later. I guess it makes the 780 look like a better deal compared to a titan even if it is £549 ..
Yields. And then some artificial pricing, and you're good to go.
PhazeDelta1
Moderator
Posts: 15616
Joined: 2010-09-12
Moderator
Posts: 15616
Joined: 2010-09-12
#4604995 Posted on: 05/26/2013 06:06 PM
Pretty much this.
Yields. And then some artificial pricing, and you're good to go.
Pretty much this.
hallryu
Don Altobello
Posts: 11380
Joined: 2007-07-29
Don Altobello
Posts: 11380
Joined: 2007-07-29
#4605749 Posted on: 05/27/2013 08:27 PM
Sweet looking card.
Sweet looking card.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
Its even worse if you look their OpenCL benchmark with DP...
It was to expect, they have restrict DP to 1/24 ( like 680).
Now on benchmark who dont forcibly use DP.. things are a bit better. ( at least between 580 > 780 )
( I dont put Luxmark ( who is a no go for Kepler anyway )
( Will be interesting to get some CUDA results )