European Court Rules Against Piracy Enabled Media Players
The EU Court of Justice ruled that media players that come pre-configured to stream pirated content are not legal in the European Union. This case was started by a Dutch anti-piracy organization, which brought suit against Filmspeler.nl, a company in the Netherlands selling media players using Kodi and plug-ins which allowed quick and easy access to illegal streaming sites on the net.
Mostly running Android, these devices are often supplied with software such as the neutral Kodi platform augmented with third-party addons, each designed to receive the latest films, TV shows or live sports, with minimum input from the user.
One of perhaps hundreds of sites involved in these sales was Netherlands-based Filmspeler.nl (Movie Player), an online store that found itself targeted by Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN. Filmspeler’s owners felt that its pre-configured devices were legal, arguing that their sale did not amount to a “communication to the public” as determined by the EU Copyright Directive.
The European court set out five conditions that must be met if you wish to reproduce copyright protected material:
- When the act is temporary
- When it’s transient or incidental
- When it’s an integral and essential part of a technological process
- When the sole purpose of that process is to enable a transmission in a network between third parties by an intermediary or a lawful use of a work or protected subject matter
- The act has no independent economic significance
None of these were applicable in the case against Filmspeler.nl, and this seemed to be an easy decision for the court. It will have far reaching consequences across Europe, where other cases are being heard regarding this type of media player.
Since copyrighted works are obtained from streaming websites without obtaining permission from copyright holders, the above standards are not completely met and no copyright exceptions are available. Streaming copyrighted content from an illicit source can therefore be considered illegal.
The Filmspeler case will now head back to the Dutch court but this decision is likely to echo all around Europe and have a notable and immediate effect on pending cases involving ‘pirate’ boxes and illicit streaming.
Razer Announces European Launch for Razer Blade Gaming Laptops - 12/02/2015 05:53 AM
Razer announced it will begin distributing its award-winning range of gaming systems in Europe next month. Initial sales will open this December 10 via Razer’s Online Retail store with the 1...
GTA V: UK Gamers paying 30% less for pre-orders than European counterparts - 09/19/2013 03:48 PM
Have you ever noticed that in certain countries games are cheaper or more expensive ? Now I am not JUST talking about tax differences, even neighboring countries in the EU show massive price differences up-to 30% in pre-order and you need to wonder why.
European Retailer is listing Radeon HD 7970 - 12/19/2011 01:18 PM
Dutch online retailer Comcom.nl listed the upcoming Radeon HD 7970 on its site. Listed, was an ASUS-branded card (with no pictures, of course), so it could be a paper listing for pre-orders. Comcom i...
Antec European Availability Eleven Hundred Chassis - 12/14/2011 01:44 PM
Antec, Inc. is proud to announce the Eleven Hundred, the newest member of the award-winning Gaming Series. The Eleven Hundred marks a new chapter in the Gaming Series with an all-new attractive design...
Need for Speed: The Run - European Car Trailer - 10/13/2011 10:47 AM
Need for Speed The Run features some of the hottest cars on the planet. From the Pagani Huayra, the Lamborghini Aventador to the Aston Martin One-77, there is no shortage of power and speed for Jack i...
Senior Member
Posts: 11337
Joined: 2011-10-22

Senior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 2017-04-07

I would, and I can.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2756181/History-making-The-futuristic-3D-printed-car-just-40-parts-costs-11-000-takes-44-hours-build.html
Senior Member
Posts: 11337
Joined: 2011-10-22
I would, and I can.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2756181/History-making-The-futuristic-3D-printed-car-just-40-parts-costs-11-000-takes-44-hours-build.html
Witchcraft!
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
This is very dangerous shift in legal view.
At this point, end user is not sued/fined/imprisoned for clicking some link to vodlocker (or similar) and watching movie stream online, since he is not redistributing this content.
This player does looking for link part for you, and in same way is not sharing this content to 3rd party.
In other words "preconfigured kodi player" = "human" from perspective of action taken to view some movie online from non-original source.
At this moment they ruled that it is device maker, who is breaching law(s).
Next step will be ownership of such box.
And then doing what you did till now (online streaming through some website) will be subject of sentencing because some banned streaming box does the same.
This is shift in direction where general population will be subject of extortion.
Posts: 111
Joined: 2017-04-07
your analogy doesn't work HeavyHemi.
"piracy" in the software world, doesn't remove content from an owner, it just takes a small amount of money away from their already obscene profits.
The industry is spending more money on chasing people that never would have bought their product anyway instead of accepting that the people who did buy it is their real source of revenue.