Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review

New Downloads
ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR) v2.0 RC4 Download
SiSoft Sandra 20/21 download v31.12
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5644 beta
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download


New Forum Topics
AMD announces Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB at 479 USD, launches on March 18th GeForce Hotfix Driver Version 461.81 AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.2.3 NVidia Anti-Aliasing Guide (updated) 461.72 - Clean Version ClockTuner v2.0 RC4 for Ryzen (CTR) info and download Review: Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD (breaching that 7 GB/sec) Intel Re-Confirms March 30 for Rocket Lake-S Launch AMD Releases Ryzen Threadripper PRO, professional CPU series Windows 10 20H2 (Build 19042.508)




Guru3D.com » News » Endurance Test of Samsung 850 Pro Comes To an End after 9100TB of writes

Endurance Test of Samsung 850 Pro Comes To an End after 9100TB of writes

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/26/2017 05:15 PM | source: | 31 comment(s)
Endurance Test of Samsung 850 Pro Comes To an End after 9100TB of writes

Yes, so that is 9.1 Petabyte of data written! Good lord. The German colleagues from c't (print magazine) have ended their SSD endurance tests after the last SSD decided to go belly up. 

That last SSD of the survivors was the Samsung 850 Pro, and it had written an astounding 9100 TB of data, yep 9,100,000 Gigabytes. That particular SSD is rated for 150 TB written and now is three years old. 

c't used six SSDs of each model: OCZ TR150, Crucial BX 200, Samsung 750 Evo, Samsung 850 Pro, SanDisk Extreme Pro and SanDisk Ultra II. Conclusive was the fact that all SSDs lasted way longer then advertised. The two SSDs that failed first where a Crucial BX200 , which lasted twice the number of advertised writes at 187 and 280 TB. Then also a number of SSDs died after a accident that caused a power surge or peak (could not understand it really well as the original article is written in German). The top batch became the SanDisk Extreme Pro and Samsung 850 Pro models, they all lasted a minimum of 2.2 Petabyte. 

A normal office system writes between 10 and 35 GB per day. Even if you had a generous 40 GB per day, a nominal endurance of 70 TBW would be achieved after five years. Now if we extrapolate that data and take it to the Samsung SSD 850 that would be 60 times the guaranteed write performance of 150 TBW. At that average of 40-gigabyte daily usage, (purely theoretical of course) that SSD would have lasted 623 years.

No matter what this articles indicates, Guru3D recommend you to always backup your data.



Endurance Test of Samsung 850 Pro Comes To an End after 9100TB of writes Endurance Test of Samsung 850 Pro Comes To an End after 9100TB of writes




« AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition vs Nvidia Titan Xp · Endurance Test of Samsung 850 Pro Comes To an End after 9100TB of writes · MSI Adds Radeon RX 550 2GT LP OC »

Related Stories

SanDisk High Endurance microSDXC Cards Lauch - 06/17/2016 08:26 AM
Yep, you read it right, High Endurance. Designed for the large-capacity corresponding to the demands of today’s home security and drive recorder, these high performance microSDXC cards (32G...

Innodisk iSLC - MLC with higher endurance - 03/30/2013 09:48 AM
Innodisk is working on iSLC NAND flash memory, a new technology that should dramatically improve the endurance of conventional MLC NAND flash memory chips. Whereas today's MLC NAND memory chips have ...


7 pages « < 4 5 6 7


schmidtbag
Senior Member



Posts: 5640
Joined: 2012-11-10

#5446776 Posted on: 06/27/2017 02:51 AM
"A normal office system writes between 10 and 35 GB per day. ""

What is a normal office, that somehow writes that much data per day?

Do not underestimate the web cache of the everday procrastinator who has access to business class internet speeds.

Exascale
Senior Member



Posts: 390
Joined: 2017-06-09

#5446798 Posted on: 06/27/2017 05:23 AM
Pretty sure hat you can remember back to when a consumer would have had a hard time wraping their head around a terabyte. Now a peta byte is-a-coming, to be an everyday phrase to toss around. Glad you found the article.
Its always interesting to get hard data from what is still a relatively new technology. I can add this to another -online- test that showed additional impressive life reserves. More than stated, by a significant margin.

Possibly you can help me get my head around what "bytes" written means. I understand the concept. But if I install a game, lets say a terabyte in size, how many "bytes" were written? Better question, using the knowledge that you have about how games are made: textures vs engine vs executables, of the 1Tb game, how many "bytes" would you feel would be written on the loading and playing of said game for an hour?

Info to better get my head around what affects the longevity of an ssd even though its a much more comfortable place since all of the longevity data has come out.

Any time data is written to, moved around, temporarily cached on an SSD, it counts towards "total bytes written" TBW of the SSD.

NAND flash cells can only be written a finite(but obviously overly pessimistic based on the demonstrated endurance) number of times.

You also have to take into account write amplification, which has to do with how data is written. You could actually end up writing a lot more data to the drive than the file size indicates. Keep in mind that an OS will usually be doing small amounts of reads and writes in the background at all times, and playing a game does a bunch of reads and possibly writes depending on the game and what it decides to page to the SSD.

Heres a good place to start

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write-amplification

http://www.seagate.com/tech-insights/ssd-over-provisioning-benefits-master-ti/

http://www.thessdreview.com/ssd-guides/beginners-guide/

I have a Crucial SSD that supports their Momentum Cache, which essentially lets me use 4GB of my system RAM as a cache to prevent a lot of unnecessary random writes, and i also enabled 10% overprovisioning beyond the SSDs 12GB standard setting since i have a 1TB drive and can use the OP to increase theoretical endurance.

slyphnier
Senior Member



Posts: 793
Joined: 2009-11-30

#5446806 Posted on: 06/27/2017 06:06 AM
"A normal office system writes between 10 and 35 GB per day. ""

What is a normal office, that somehow writes that much data per day?

take a look on task manager -> performance -> drive activity
there many things writing in background
windows/apps/program, browser, stream (youtube/netflix) cache
do u think a drive only writing when u saving some data/files to it ?

Koniakki
Senior Member



Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15

#5446838 Posted on: 06/27/2017 08:37 AM
Sammy 950 PRO. Looking good? :thumbup:






thatguy91
Senior Member



Posts: 6643
Joined: 2010-08-27

#5446842 Posted on: 06/27/2017 09:02 AM
I just paid 296 Euro for an 8TB HDD...
Choosing 4x 2TB Samsung 850 EVO's (as cheap as possible without sacrificing too much on quality), that would cost from the same seller: 2636 Euro

I don't see them covering the NINE times price difference in the next 3-5 years. HDD's of similar capacity will drop in price as well during that time.

There are other technologies in development as well, although they are likely the potential successors to NAND. In the meantime, mechanical HDD's still have potential in much larger sizes using HAMR (Heat Assisted Magnetic Recording) for example.

7 pages « < 4 5 6 7


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021