Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.24.193
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1994
GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24


New Forum Topics
Should I use the latest stable release of "Nvidia Profile Inspector" or the latest pre-release? ASUS DARK HERO X570 CLUB Need input on this gpu? Free to grab: Bioshock: The Collection at Epic Games Store AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.1 WHQL driver download and discussion A 500Hz refresh rate NVIDIA G-Sync compatible gaming LCD is in the works MSI AB / RTSS development news thread Nvidia Profile Inspector's AA not working with a specific game Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC Secure boot Vialation




Guru3D.com » News » EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block

EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/26/2015 09:14 AM | source: | 46 comment(s)
EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block

EK is showing a preliminary model of how they feel what liquid cooling should look like on the Radeon R9 Fury X with their EK-FC R9 Fury X water block.

There you go, first sneak peak:

  • Will come with single-slot bracket included and in all four versions (but no CSQ this time)
  • All five backplates available (black, nickel, red, blue, gold/yellow)
  • Single-slot height compliant! 

First batch will be ready and distributed worldwide before you will have your card in hands.



EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block




« EASARS Flare RGB Mechanical Keyboard Launches · EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block · Ozone Gaming ORIGEN Mousepad »

10 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


LimitbreakOr
Senior Member



Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-04-02

#5108206 Posted on: 06/26/2015 05:08 PM
The reviewers can overclock it up to the limits of CCC's native overclocking implementation. CCC does not expose voltage control to the user on any card. When reviewers are adjusting voltages they use a program like MSI Afterburner. Being a third party program, AMD has no involvement in its development. Fury has a new voltage controller. Once the 3rd party programs are updated to know how to control the controller, overclocking should be a lot more potent.


Thank you but that is my point, they should have made sure reviewers had the tools necessary.

LimitbreakOr
Senior Member



Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-04-02

#5108209 Posted on: 06/26/2015 05:11 PM
BTW, this waterblock doesn't belong on the fury X, it belongs on the Fury without The X for 550$

Despoiler
Senior Member



Posts: 244
Joined: 2003-03-19

#5108271 Posted on: 06/26/2015 06:43 PM
I would say they are going to be able to overclock further, but the power consumption is likely to go thru the roof.
I'll be happily surprised if the clocks go way higher, I just don't expect more than 1300, maybe stable for a lot of Fury X's, with extra Voltage.

Look at all the 390/X overclocks in the reviews. The power consumption goes up by quite a lot. Fury/X is the same fab process, larger chip, more shaders, same speed.

No one cares about power consumption when overclocking. You don't care how much gas a car uses if you build it up to drag race. No one that drag races is using a Prius.

Thank you but that is my point, they should have made sure reviewers had the tools necessary.

You clearly do not understand what I just wrote.

Darkest
Senior Member



Posts: 10126
Joined: 2003-03-25

#5108276 Posted on: 06/26/2015 06:48 PM
Yeah but past AMD cards have shown voltage OC is a hit or a miss, usually the latter in my experience.


I'm pretty sure we'll see an improvement with voltage control, but as you say it can be hit or miss depending on how much of a gain we'll see. I'd love to see a big improvement, but I suspect these cards are already close to maxed out.

Shy of LN2 and benchmarking I doubt we'll see anything special going forward tbh.

LimitbreakOr
Senior Member



Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-04-02

#5108277 Posted on: 06/26/2015 06:49 PM

You clearly do not understand what I just wrote.

I do understand perfectly what you wrote but it is obvious that you are very linear.

10 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022