AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review
EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block
EK is showing a preliminary model of how they feel what liquid cooling should look like on the Radeon R9 Fury X with their EK-FC R9 Fury X water block.
There you go, first sneak peak:
- Will come with single-slot bracket included and in all four versions (but no CSQ this time)
- All five backplates available (black, nickel, red, blue, gold/yellow)
- Single-slot height compliant!
First batch will be ready and distributed worldwide before you will have your card in hands.
« EASARS Flare RGB Mechanical Keyboard Launches · EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block
· Ozone Gaming ORIGEN Mousepad »
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11554
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11554
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5108184 Posted on: 06/26/2015 04:41 PM
Yeah but past AMD cards have shown voltage OC is a hit or a miss, usually the latter in my experience.
Just shows this card is running near max clocks out of the box
Probably due to the lack of voltage control, which is a massive gaffe on AMD's end.
Yeah but past AMD cards have shown voltage OC is a hit or a miss, usually the latter in my experience.
Because +75 MHz on default clock it`s not really overclocking.
Just shows this card is running near max clocks out of the box
Evildead666
Senior Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: 2003-09-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: 2003-09-14
#5108192 Posted on: 06/26/2015 04:49 PM
I would say they are going to be able to overclock further, but the power consumption is likely to go thru the roof.
I'll be happily surprised if the clocks go way higher, I just don't expect more than 1300, maybe stable for a lot of Fury X's, with extra Voltage.
Look at all the 390/X overclocks in the reviews. The power consumption goes up by quite a lot. Fury/X is the same fab process, larger chip, more shaders, same speed.
The reviewers can overclock it up to the limits of CCC's native overclocking implementation. CCC does not expose voltage control to the user on any card. When reviewers are adjusting voltages they use a program like MSI Afterburner. Being a third party program, AMD has no involvement in its development. Fury has a new voltage controller. Once the 3rd party programs are updated to know how to control the controller, overclocking should be a lot more potent.
I would say they are going to be able to overclock further, but the power consumption is likely to go thru the roof.
I'll be happily surprised if the clocks go way higher, I just don't expect more than 1300, maybe stable for a lot of Fury X's, with extra Voltage.
Look at all the 390/X overclocks in the reviews. The power consumption goes up by quite a lot. Fury/X is the same fab process, larger chip, more shaders, same speed.
Embra
Senior Member
Posts: 1268
Joined: 2014-11-19
Senior Member
Posts: 1268
Joined: 2014-11-19
#5108197 Posted on: 06/26/2015 04:54 PM
Was CCC used in OCing in review? I would think since the Voltage control is new, third party software may not function properly ....needing updates.
Was CCC used in OCing in review? I would think since the Voltage control is new, third party software may not function properly ....needing updates.
LimitbreakOr
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-04-02
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-04-02
#5108204 Posted on: 06/26/2015 05:04 PM
I dont consider it an overclock until that voltage had been ramped up, there's very little overclock headroom at stock voltages.
Why is everyone saying its not overclockable? The core is overclockable, the memory isnt which doesnt matter.. The card has plenty of memory bandwidth, overclocking the memory will reap zero benefits.
I dont consider it an overclock until that voltage had been ramped up, there's very little overclock headroom at stock voltages.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 10126
Joined: 2003-03-25
Probably due to the lack of voltage control, which is a massive gaffe on AMD's end.