MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Promo: Microsoft Office 2016 for $29.82
Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
Download: Cinebench R15 Extreme Edition - Unofficial MOD for HEDT platforms
CineBench15 has been around for years. However, Maxon never updated it to cope with many-core processors. The 16-core and even 32-core processors these days can finish up the benchmark in merely seconds. This modded version offers a fourfold increase in workload.
Download: 3DMark for Windows (v2.8.6427) now available - 02/04/2019 08:15 PM
UL released an update for 3DMark for Windows. This update adds the NVIDIA DLSS feature test for comparing DLSS performance and image quality. ...
Download: Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.1 Drivers - 02/04/2019 07:44 PM
The Radeon Technologies Group has released Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.1. This release supports the upcoming launches for Apex Legends and The Division 2 Private Beta. This release al...
Download: Nvidia GeForce 418.81 WHQL - 02/04/2019 03:20 PM
Nvidia just released GeForce 418.81 WHQL drivers for you to download. It supports all the latest RTX cards as well as being optimized for the latest 3DMark Port Royal benchmark, which has just add...
Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) v18.0.0.8 - 02/02/2019 09:56 AM
Download Display Driver Uninstaller DDU, which has been updated to revision v18.0.0.8. This application is a driver removal utility that can help you completely uninstall AMD/NVIDIA graphics card dri...
Download: AfterBurner 4.6.0 Beta 12 (Build 14315) - 01/28/2019 10:19 AM
We have updated to a new public beta of AfterBurner. The new beta fixes a V/F curve rendering issue with AMD GPUs and adds support for several Turing GPUs as well as a number of other changes. Down...
Mr. Fox
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2014-07-02
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2014-07-02
#5636303 Posted on: 02/06/2019 07:11 PM
Nice mod. Good job. I only ran it at 4.8GHz this time just to see how it worked. Next time I do a direct connection to my chiller I will run it at 5.2GHz.
I could see this mod being an issue for people with 1080p screens. The window cannot be resized properly for lower resolutions, so they won't be able to submit valid scores on HWBOT if it ever becomes eligible to receive points because the CPU-Z windows cannot be covering the render scene area. If you do that the submission will be disqualified. HWBOT would need to change the rules to accommodate that.
See the discussion below the rules at this link: https://hwbot.org/news/9635-application-48-rules/
If your monitor cannot provide the needed information including the full rendered scene you cannot bench cinebench for ranking. If you see the fact that this rule was introduced because big and massive cheats were discovered and full rendered scene is only reliable way to detect and prevent this as a can of worms for no reason, I slightly disagree, because it was this or ban cinebench completely from hwbot
I could see this mod being an issue for people with 1080p screens. The window cannot be resized properly for lower resolutions, so they won't be able to submit valid scores on HWBOT if it ever becomes eligible to receive points because the CPU-Z windows cannot be covering the render scene area. If you do that the submission will be disqualified. HWBOT would need to change the rules to accommodate that.
See the discussion below the rules at this link: https://hwbot.org/news/9635-application-48-rules/
If your monitor cannot provide the needed information including the full rendered scene you cannot bench cinebench for ranking. If you see the fact that this rule was introduced because big and massive cheats were discovered and full rendered scene is only reliable way to detect and prevent this as a can of worms for no reason, I slightly disagree, because it was this or ban cinebench completely from hwbot
HWgeek
Senior Member
Posts: 439
Joined: 2005-04-04
Senior Member
Posts: 439
Joined: 2005-04-04
#5636319 Posted on: 02/06/2019 08:14 PM
I am still searching if we can scale it down, If someone has an idea I will be happy to learn.
For now- maybe 1080P users can use RADEON/NV screen resolution upscale in drivers to make it ~2K/4K and take full screen print-screen?
I am still searching if we can scale it down, If someone has an idea I will be happy to learn.
For now- maybe 1080P users can use RADEON/NV screen resolution upscale in drivers to make it ~2K/4K and take full screen print-screen?
danhaf
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2014-09-22
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2014-09-22
#5636323 Posted on: 02/06/2019 08:27 PM
So i just tested it with default settings (got 1400ish) and at 4Ghz
So i just tested it with default settings (got 1400ish) and at 4Ghz
Mr. Fox
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2014-07-02
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2014-07-02
#5636334 Posted on: 02/06/2019 08:52 PM
I am still searching if we can scale it down, If someone has an idea I will be happy to learn.
For now- maybe 1080P users can use RADEON/NV screen resolution upscale in drivers to make it ~2K/4K and take full screen print-screen?
If we can get HWBOT to lighten up on the render scene being partially covered by CPU-Z windows a scaling fix would not even be necessary. I think the concern is people falsifying their submissions or something along those lines. But, if a person were inclined to be so dishonest, it would be easier to falsify the screen shot if the CPU-Z windows are not overlapping the render scene. I agree with the intent, but I think the rule itself that the render scene cannot be partially obscured by CPU-Z windows actually misses the mark on what they are trying to accomplish.
I am still searching if we can scale it down, If someone has an idea I will be happy to learn.
For now- maybe 1080P users can use RADEON/NV screen resolution upscale in drivers to make it ~2K/4K and take full screen print-screen?
If we can get HWBOT to lighten up on the render scene being partially covered by CPU-Z windows a scaling fix would not even be necessary. I think the concern is people falsifying their submissions or something along those lines. But, if a person were inclined to be so dishonest, it would be easier to falsify the screen shot if the CPU-Z windows are not overlapping the render scene. I agree with the intent, but I think the rule itself that the render scene cannot be partially obscured by CPU-Z windows actually misses the mark on what they are trying to accomplish.
ViTi95
Junior Member
Posts: 4
Joined: 2019-02-06
Junior Member
Posts: 4
Joined: 2019-02-06
#5636392 Posted on: 02/06/2019 11:39 PM
Horus-Anhur
Senior Member
Posts: 180
Joined: 2013-02-05
Senior Member
Posts: 180
Joined: 2013-02-05
#5636412 Posted on: 02/07/2019 01:26 AM
JamesSneed
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: 2017-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: 2017-02-14
#5636423 Posted on: 02/07/2019 02:30 AM
Agree. Along with removing any variance that may occur due to the test being to short like single core boost clocks etc. I see no issue having a longer running test it could be a bit more accurate albeit I doubt its going to make a large change in the accuracy.
I think the idea is letting the benchmark run for longer and catch some thermal throttle.
Agree. Along with removing any variance that may occur due to the test being to short like single core boost clocks etc. I see no issue having a longer running test it could be a bit more accurate albeit I doubt its going to make a large change in the accuracy.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12262
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 12262
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5636429 Posted on: 02/07/2019 03:00 AM
Is that a dual chip?
Is that a dual chip?
DLD
Senior Member
Posts: 838
Joined: 2002-09-14
Senior Member
Posts: 838
Joined: 2002-09-14
#5636455 Posted on: 02/07/2019 06:45 AM
135 cb (2600K)
89 fps (gtx1060/6 GB)
no hyperthreading, virtualization enabled, default values of freq. and voltages
with HT, CPU score rises to 172 (all cores)
///edit1: OpenGL score ~88 with CPU HT enabled///
Looks like I bought me an excellent card - runs a few frames slower than an average 1080. Thanx Gods I did not haste at the time I was upgrading from 770 (almost opted for a Radeon, since there was a kind of momentary shortage of 1060/6 gigas so I was offered to choose between one with 3 GB and some AMD card, don't remember which model.:cool
. Luckilly, I said "No! I'll wait." I was a DAMN fool once - only once in this regard - when i had purchased Powercolor X1600 pro, quite a few years ago. I don't have the nerves to describe my nightmares caused by this card - simply, it was Power-less and Color-less. A mess. Never again an AMD card, unless it is wrapped up in a 1000 Euro banknote and given to me as a present (if it ever happens, I'll buy me a nice KnowVidia card for that money and call the guys who are collecting the electronic waste to take away...you know what).
On another note: why was it so hard to make this program detect OS correctly ("win 8", instead of 10)?. I think I'll do some reverse engineering here...Yeah, yeah, I know it isn't crucial, but still leaves a bit of a bitter taste in one's mouth
edit2: NOW it reports OS correctly:
https://ibb.co/Kqf39jB
89 fps (gtx1060/6 GB)
no hyperthreading, virtualization enabled, default values of freq. and voltages
with HT, CPU score rises to 172 (all cores)
///edit1: OpenGL score ~88 with CPU HT enabled///
Looks like I bought me an excellent card - runs a few frames slower than an average 1080. Thanx Gods I did not haste at the time I was upgrading from 770 (almost opted for a Radeon, since there was a kind of momentary shortage of 1060/6 gigas so I was offered to choose between one with 3 GB and some AMD card, don't remember which model.:cool
. Luckilly, I said "No! I'll wait." I was a DAMN fool once - only once in this regard - when i had purchased Powercolor X1600 pro, quite a few years ago. I don't have the nerves to describe my nightmares caused by this card - simply, it was Power-less and Color-less. A mess. Never again an AMD card, unless it is wrapped up in a 1000 Euro banknote and given to me as a present (if it ever happens, I'll buy me a nice KnowVidia card for that money and call the guys who are collecting the electronic waste to take away...you know what).On another note: why was it so hard to make this program detect OS correctly ("win 8", instead of 10)?. I think I'll do some reverse engineering here...Yeah, yeah, I know it isn't crucial, but still leaves a bit of a bitter taste in one's mouth
edit2: NOW it reports OS correctly:
https://ibb.co/Kqf39jB
Dimer81
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-02-07
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-02-07
#5636535 Posted on: 02/07/2019 12:57 PM
Hello! I'm new here. Here is my result.
Hello! I'm new here. Here is my result.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12262
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 12262
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5636538 Posted on: 02/07/2019 01:06 PM
Hello! I'm new here. Here is my result.
For you even this extreme benchmark is not that extreme.
Hello! I'm new here. Here is my result.
For you even this extreme benchmark is not that extreme.
Tortelli
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2016-01-21
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2016-01-21
#5636541 Posted on: 02/07/2019 01:13 PM
9900k @ 5,0 Ghz all core (with some things running at the background);
Single core score is pretty poor? (the MP ratio is higher than i expected)
Would be cool for notebooks to have an option to run this test like 20 times to see the differance in score after each test?.
9900k @ 5,0 Ghz all core (with some things running at the background);
Single core score is pretty poor? (the MP ratio is higher than i expected)
Would be cool for notebooks to have an option to run this test like 20 times to see the differance in score after each test?.
Dimer81
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-02-07
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-02-07
#5636542 Posted on: 02/07/2019 01:15 PM
Normal test cinebench r15 scores 7400 points )
For you even this extreme benchmark is not that extreme.
Normal test cinebench r15 scores 7400 points )
HWgeek
Senior Member
Posts: 439
Joined: 2005-04-04
Senior Member
Posts: 439
Joined: 2005-04-04
#5636544 Posted on: 02/07/2019 01:21 PM
I am planing to make Mobile version for it, it will run for few min before the final run with the actual R15 score after the cooling will beg for mercy
This whey you gonna be able to tell which model will be better for long workloads/has better cooling that won't limit the CPU.
I am planing to make Mobile version for it, it will run for few min before the final run with the actual R15 score after the cooling will beg for mercy
This whey you gonna be able to tell which model will be better for long workloads/has better cooling that won't limit the CPU.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2016-08-10
I think the idea is letting the benchmark run for longer and catch some thermal throttle.