Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
Download AMD Radeon Software Crimson 16.11.2 driver
AMD releases a new 16.11.2 hotfix driver that is focused on an improvement to a Shader Cache feature to allow more shaders to be stored for demanding games that have previously hit the old storage cap. Call of Duty will benefit from this feature.
Download AMD Radeon Software Crimson 16.11.1 hotfix driver - 11/03/2016 10:35 PM
AMD just issued a new driver fo you to download, the Radeon Software Crimson 16.11.1 hotfix build. This driver is focused on game day launch support for Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare and Call of Dut...
Futuremark releases VRMark for Download - 11/03/2016 01:31 PM
Futuremark today released VRMark, the virtual reality benchmark from the developers of 3DMark. So if you're thinking about buying an HTC Vive or an Oculus Rift this holiday, wouldn't it be good to ...
Download Nvidia GeForce 375.76 Hotfix driver - 11/02/2016 11:40 PM
Download the Nvidia GeForce GameReady 375.76 Hotfix driver as released by NVIDIA. This is GeForce Hot Fix driver version 375.76 that addresses the following: Occasional flicker on high refresh rate mo...
Download Nvidia GeForce 375.70 WHQL driver - 10/28/2016 06:09 PM
You can now download a new Nvidia driver set, tagged 375.70 WHQL. The new set will bring support to Titanfall 2, Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered, The Elder Sc...
Download AMD Radeon Software Crimson 16.10.3 hotfix driver - 10/28/2016 12:10 PM
You can now download the new AMD Radeon Software Crimson Edition drivers release 16.10.3 driver. This release is a small update to the previously posted RSCE 16.10.2 driver and provides a fix for a...
AlleyViper
Senior Member
Posts: 524
Joined: 2005-10-05
Senior Member
Posts: 524
Joined: 2005-10-05
#5355114 Posted on: 11/05/2016 06:01 PM
Will report idle bug when the form's GUI is updated. It only shows 16.11.1 for now.
There might be a chance that the "H.264 content playback(...) note is somehow related.
Will report idle bug when the form's GUI is updated. It only shows 16.11.1 for now.
There might be a chance that the "H.264 content playback(...) note is somehow related.
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 17563
Joined: 2009-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 17563
Joined: 2009-02-25
#5355115 Posted on: 11/05/2016 06:06 PM
Looks like AMD altered "VSR" for the 400 series a couple of driver releases back so it goes up to 5120x2880 now, still capped at 3840x2160 for the 300 series and Fury though.
Looks like AMD altered "VSR" for the 400 series a couple of driver releases back so it goes up to 5120x2880 now, still capped at 3840x2160 for the 300 series and Fury though.
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 8103
Joined: 2014-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 8103
Joined: 2014-09-27
#5355123 Posted on: 11/05/2016 06:40 PM
Interesting. That would fit the theory that the Polaris chip in the new Macbooks that can drive 5k screens, is actually not custom silicon, as a lot of Apple fans wanted to believe.
Looks like AMD altered "VSR" for the 400 series a couple of driver releases back so it goes up to 5120x2880 now, still capped at 3840x2160 for the 300 series and Fury though.
Interesting. That would fit the theory that the Polaris chip in the new Macbooks that can drive 5k screens, is actually not custom silicon, as a lot of Apple fans wanted to believe.
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 17563
Joined: 2009-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 17563
Joined: 2009-02-25
#5355162 Posted on: 11/05/2016 08:19 PM
Hmm that makes sense, haven't seen the specs for the Mac Book (Been a lot of discussion recently of what it doesn't have though heh.) but a 470 or maybe the full 480 would probably work without AMD doing a different chip design specifically for that system.
Might have added some additional refresh rates too: (Up to 100hz for 3840x2160, still not full 144 for those using such a display or 120 but still a improvement if it was 60 before.)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5803l0/new-driver-added-3840x2160-100hz-to-the-vsr-list/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/53za2z/apparently-amd-has-silently-increased-vsr/
(Added from one of the 16.9.x driver it seems going by when it was first reported.)
Not really sure how the whole hardware side of this with VSR works (Scalar or what it was.) but there are updates for the Polaris GPU chip so supporting a higher resolution probably would be achievable unless it turns out it's just some adjustment entirely in the driver software as some have suspect since back when VSR could be modified a bit more easily even for older GPU models.
EDIT: Reading the Reddit thread well for Fury and older GPU's AMD doesn't officially list 3840x2160 or 3840x2400 as available for a monitor using 2560x1440 or 2560x1600 (Instead it's 3200x1800 and 3200x2000 I believe.) but it is available or at least I can select 3840x2160 although GPU scaling has to be off in Crimson first (But the monitor already does scaling and can be customized a bit more so that's just a benefit.)
(Still not a full 2.00x which would be 5120x2800 / 5120x3200 depending on if it's 16:9 2560x1440 or 16:10 2560x1600 and still no VSR support for ultra-wide 21:9 resolutions from what I've read.)
(But 1.5x is still better than 1.25x and well "4K" as it's commonly called even if it's not a full 4096x resolution is certainly demanding enough particularly for newer games.
)
(EDIT: Yeah it seems the "true" res would be 4096x2160)
Interesting. That would fit the theory that the Polaris chip in the new Macbooks that can drive 5k screens, is actually not custom silicon, as a lot of Apple fans wanted to believe.
Hmm that makes sense, haven't seen the specs for the Mac Book (Been a lot of discussion recently of what it doesn't have though heh.) but a 470 or maybe the full 480 would probably work without AMD doing a different chip design specifically for that system.
Might have added some additional refresh rates too: (Up to 100hz for 3840x2160, still not full 144 for those using such a display or 120 but still a improvement if it was 60 before.)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5803l0/new-driver-added-3840x2160-100hz-to-the-vsr-list/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/53za2z/apparently-amd-has-silently-increased-vsr/
(Added from one of the 16.9.x driver it seems going by when it was first reported.)
Not really sure how the whole hardware side of this with VSR works (Scalar or what it was.) but there are updates for the Polaris GPU chip so supporting a higher resolution probably would be achievable unless it turns out it's just some adjustment entirely in the driver software as some have suspect since back when VSR could be modified a bit more easily even for older GPU models.
EDIT: Reading the Reddit thread well for Fury and older GPU's AMD doesn't officially list 3840x2160 or 3840x2400 as available for a monitor using 2560x1440 or 2560x1600 (Instead it's 3200x1800 and 3200x2000 I believe.) but it is available or at least I can select 3840x2160 although GPU scaling has to be off in Crimson first (But the monitor already does scaling and can be customized a bit more so that's just a benefit.)
(Still not a full 2.00x which would be 5120x2800 / 5120x3200 depending on if it's 16:9 2560x1440 or 16:10 2560x1600 and still no VSR support for ultra-wide 21:9 resolutions from what I've read.)
(But 1.5x is still better than 1.25x and well "4K" as it's commonly called even if it's not a full 4096x resolution is certainly demanding enough particularly for newer games.
)
(EDIT: Yeah it seems the "true" res would be 4096x2160)
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Unregistered
reverted to 16.10.3.. first match... on the loading dxgi error LOL.
restarted the game, i have played for about 1 hour without error or crash... smooth.