Cooler Master MasterBox Q500L review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Advanced OC review
ASRock Z390 Steel Legend review
Corsair M55 RGB PRO gaming mouse review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Lexar NM600 NVMe M.2. SSD (480GB) review
Tech preview: Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT
Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - 7nm ZEN2
Patriot Viper VPN100 M2 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
Dell UltraSharp 32in 8K UP3218K Monitor Available for 4999 USD
Dell recently announced their UP3218K monitor, not just something Ultra HD, it handles 8K Ultra HD at 7680x4320 pixels @ 60 Hz at 100% of the Adobe RGB- and sRGB color spaces. The pricing is confirmed at 4999 USD, the display is available now.
Dell: In 2015, they brought you the UltraSharp 34 Curved Monitor with its innovative curved display and the UltraSharp 27 Ultra HD 5K Monitor with its stunning 5K resolution – both CES Innovation Award Honorees. In 2016, we announced our first OLED Monitor and brought the innovative InfinityEdge technology, that debuted in 2015 on XPS 13, to the monitor portfolio. This year, they announced an extensive new lineup of innovative monitors, including the Dell UltraSharp 32 Ultra HD 8K.
Dell UltraSharp 32 Ultra HD 8K Monitor (UP3218K)
With the new UltraSharp 32 Ultra HD 8K Monitor (UP3218K), they’re pushing the boundaries of innovation to feature four times more content than Ultra HD 4K resolution and 16 times more content than Full HD in addition to 33.2 million pixels of resolution compared to a 5K monitor’s 14 million pixels of resolution. The new UP3218K offers breakthrough realism with the finest details and color-critical performance for a truly transcendent visual experience thanks to Dell PremierColor, which offers 1.07 billion colors and 100 percent Adobe RGB and 100 percent sRGB, and an unprecedented 280 ppi to view most images in native format.
Pricing and availability
The Dell UltraSharp 32 Ultra HD 8K Monitor (UP3218K) is be available since March 23 on Dell.com in the United States starting at $4,999. I guess we should call it a 5K costing 8K model ;)
Dell UltraSharp 32: a 32-inch Ultra HD display set to arrive in Q4 - 07/24/2013 08:39 AM
Well, this one should bring a nice smile on your face. Dell took the opportunity to unleash one such display during the proceedings at SIGGRAPH this week. The UltraSharp 32 is a 32-inch Ultra HD unit...
Dell UltraSharp U2413 24-Inch LCD Monitor - 12/06/2012 09:21 AM
Dell hits back by launching their latest LCD monitor for the Chinese market, the UltraSharp U2413. Adopting an AH-IPS panel, this new 24-inch LED-backlight monitor provides 1920 x 1200 native resoluti...
Dell UltraSharp U2410 LCD sports IPS panel - 08/07/2009 08:52 AM
Hmm, nice. Dell announced their very first 1920x1200 display based on IPS or in-plane-switching technology today. It
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 5024
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 5024
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5411819 Posted on: 03/24/2017 12:25 PM
My GTX970 can drive it. For whatever purpose this panel was made. Probably media editing.
edit: nope. Way too mich pixels.
Does this thing even work on consumer-level GPUs? I think at least nvidia doesn't allow 8K on anything less than Quadro cards? Or was that 10K?
My GTX970 can drive it. For whatever purpose this panel was made. Probably media editing.
edit: nope. Way too mich pixels.
RonanH
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: 2006-09-23
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: 2006-09-23
#5411825 Posted on: 03/24/2017 12:33 PM
" I guess we should call it a 5K costing 8K model
"
Think you meant an 8k costing 5k
" I guess we should call it a 5K costing 8K model
"
Think you meant an 8k costing 5k
Camaxide
Member
Posts: 40
Joined: 2016-05-29
Member
Posts: 40
Joined: 2016-05-29
#5411839 Posted on: 03/24/2017 01:00 PM
https://www.nvidia.no/graphics-cards/geforce/pascal/gtx-1080-ti/#redirected
Yes it can be run by new high end graphics card - it hits right up at the max.
Does this thing even work on consumer-level GPUs? I think at least nvidia doesn't allow 8K on anything less than Quadro cards? Or was that 10K?
https://www.nvidia.no/graphics-cards/geforce/pascal/gtx-1080-ti/#redirected
Yes it can be run by new high end graphics card - it hits right up at the max.
SirDremor
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008-06-20
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008-06-20
#5411847 Posted on: 03/24/2017 01:33 PM
8K? On 32 inch? Useless.
And I don't buy this "media editing"... at 8K it is impossible to edit anything without using huge magnification, up to the point when visible "pixels" size is the same as on any 1080p screen.
And using 8K on 32 inch just to "appreciate" the final result is plain stupid, and actually still useless, because at such tiny pixels it is almost impossible to see the difference with smaller resolution version.
8K? On 32 inch? Useless.
And I don't buy this "media editing"... at 8K it is impossible to edit anything without using huge magnification, up to the point when visible "pixels" size is the same as on any 1080p screen.
And using 8K on 32 inch just to "appreciate" the final result is plain stupid, and actually still useless, because at such tiny pixels it is almost impossible to see the difference with smaller resolution version.
Valken
Senior Member
Posts: 1451
Joined: 2011-01-05
Senior Member
Posts: 1451
Joined: 2011-01-05
#5411859 Posted on: 03/24/2017 02:08 PM
Double the width and come to papa...
Double the width and come to papa...
AlmondMan
Senior Member
Posts: 439
Joined: 2007-09-03
Senior Member
Posts: 439
Joined: 2007-09-03
#5411860 Posted on: 03/24/2017 02:11 PM
RX 480 can run an 8k monitor it seems... DP 1.4 connectors.
Does this thing even work on consumer-level GPUs? I think at least nvidia doesn't allow 8K on anything less than Quadro cards? Or was that 10K?
RX 480 can run an 8k monitor it seems... DP 1.4 connectors.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12125
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12125
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5411867 Posted on: 03/24/2017 02:21 PM
8K? On 32 inch? Useless.
And I don't buy this "media editing"... at 8K it is impossible to edit anything without using huge magnification, up to the point when visible "pixels" size is the same as on any 1080p screen.
And using 8K on 32 inch just to "appreciate" the final result is plain stupid, and actually still useless, because at such tiny pixels it is almost impossible to see the difference with smaller resolution version.
We have 5K monitors for our CAD guys where I work and they still say they want more so..
8K? On 32 inch? Useless.
And I don't buy this "media editing"... at 8K it is impossible to edit anything without using huge magnification, up to the point when visible "pixels" size is the same as on any 1080p screen.
And using 8K on 32 inch just to "appreciate" the final result is plain stupid, and actually still useless, because at such tiny pixels it is almost impossible to see the difference with smaller resolution version.
We have 5K monitors for our CAD guys where I work and they still say they want more so..
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 2457
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2457
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5411890 Posted on: 03/24/2017 03:25 PM
Year 2030:
MOOOM i need a new monitor, this 10k screen gives me pixelated image, Tommy next door has 12k screen and I can see a clear difference! ..........
Year 2030:
MOOOM i need a new monitor, this 10k screen gives me pixelated image, Tommy next door has 12k screen and I can see a clear difference! ..........
Ricepudding
Senior Member
Posts: 471
Joined: 2017-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 471
Joined: 2017-02-17
#5411911 Posted on: 03/24/2017 03:57 PM
I think this monitor is using DP 1.3 (two of them) to run this, unless they have changed that of course since showing of the prototype
RX 480 can run an 8k monitor it seems... DP 1.4 connectors.
I think this monitor is using DP 1.3 (two of them) to run this, unless they have changed that of course since showing of the prototype
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5411920 Posted on: 03/24/2017 04:06 PM
Can we all please stop the nonsense complaining?
It's about getting closer and closer to "reality", as reality doesn't have pixels. The universe is "almost" continuous ( atoms being the smallest "pixel" )
Obviously, display panels don't need to get their pixels to the atom level, but a level small enough so no matter how close my nose is to the screen I won't see pixels, and any line at any angle is perfectly smooth, like drawn on paper with a pencil... I'll take that !
Can we all please stop the nonsense complaining?
It's about getting closer and closer to "reality", as reality doesn't have pixels. The universe is "almost" continuous ( atoms being the smallest "pixel" )
Obviously, display panels don't need to get their pixels to the atom level, but a level small enough so no matter how close my nose is to the screen I won't see pixels, and any line at any angle is perfectly smooth, like drawn on paper with a pencil... I'll take that !
Laci
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: 2012-12-24
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: 2012-12-24
#5411932 Posted on: 03/24/2017 04:39 PM
GTX 1060 and GTX 1070 can also run at 8k resolution
GTX 1060 and GTX 1070 can also run at 8k resolution
BD2015
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: 2015-08-08
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: 2015-08-08
#5411996 Posted on: 03/24/2017 07:29 PM
Absolutely love the way Dell pushes the envelope. I do wonder what connectivity this might have. Single DP 1.4 should be able to handle it, but Dell tends to use older standards and compensates with having to use multiple cables. Not that there's that much wrong with it, but less cables is always better. (Plus it removes potential issues area)
Edit:
Well, it's 2 x DP (ver 1.4) for 60Hz.
Absolutely love the way Dell pushes the envelope. I do wonder what connectivity this might have. Single DP 1.4 should be able to handle it, but Dell tends to use older standards and compensates with having to use multiple cables. Not that there's that much wrong with it, but less cables is always better. (Plus it removes potential issues area)
Edit:
Well, it's 2 x DP (ver 1.4) for 60Hz.
LNCPapa
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2010-11-05
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2010-11-05
#5412073 Posted on: 03/24/2017 10:01 PM
I'm running 4K on 32" with no scaling and it's perfect. If things got any smaller than this it would be too difficult to use efficiently. I wouldn't mind seeing what the use cases would be for this though.
I'm running 4K on 32" with no scaling and it's perfect. If things got any smaller than this it would be too difficult to use efficiently. I wouldn't mind seeing what the use cases would be for this though.
TheDeeGee
Senior Member
Posts: 5949
Joined: 2010-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 5949
Joined: 2010-08-28
#5412076 Posted on: 03/24/2017 10:11 PM
This is probably aimed at Hospitals.
This is probably aimed at Hospitals.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2872
Joined: 2011-11-24
Does this thing even work on consumer-level GPUs? I think at least nvidia doesn't allow 8K on anything less than Quadro cards? Or was that 10K?