Zotac Gaming GTX 1650 Super review
Radeon Adrenalin 2020 Edition Driver Overview
Guru3D Winter 2019 PC Buyer Guide
Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Corsair Void RGB Elite Wireless Headset review
Team Group PD400 Portable SSD review
AMD Athlon 3000G review
Team Group T-Force Delta Max 1 TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2019
Dell UltraSharp 32: a 32-inch Ultra HD display set to arrive in Q4
Well, this one should bring a nice smile on your face. Dell took the opportunity to unleash one such display during the proceedings at SIGGRAPH this week. The UltraSharp 32 is a 32-inch Ultra HD unit that wields a 3,840 x 2,160 IGZO panel sorting 1.07 billion colors. An aluminum stand has replaced the plastic-draped one from previous models, but the same height adjustments reside around back.
The UltraSharp 32 also houses both full and mini display ports (with the requisite cable included), HDMI jack, a built-in USB hub and an SD card reader along the left side. We had a chance to take a quick peek at the device and we can confirm the image quality -- especially when it comes to handling rich blacks. We also enjoyed gazing upon a matte finish rather than a glossy surface and we're told Dell has actually made some tweaks there to reduce any grainy results that may creep in. There's no word on pricing just yet, but the display is set to arrive during the fourth quarter of this year. A smattering of images from our brief eyes-on session await in the gallery.
Dell UltraSharp U2413 24-Inch LCD Monitor - 12/06/2012 08:21 AM
Dell hits back by launching their latest LCD monitor for the Chinese market, the UltraSharp U2413. Adopting an AH-IPS panel, this new 24-inch LED-backlight monitor provides 1920 x 1200 native resoluti...
Dell UltraSharp U2410 LCD sports IPS panel - 08/07/2009 07:52 AM
Hmm, nice. Dell announced their very first 1920x1200 display based on IPS or in-plane-switching technology today. It
iZomBaDi
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: 2007-05-01
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: 2007-05-01
#4625436 Posted on: 07/24/2013 10:47 AM
It looks ok, nothing amazing in terms of bezel design.
Let's hope we get some early reviews so we can see if it can really perform better than it looks...
It looks ok, nothing amazing in terms of bezel design.
Let's hope we get some early reviews so we can see if it can really perform better than it looks...
rpsgc
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: 2006-02-12
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: 2006-02-12
#4625438 Posted on: 07/24/2013 10:53 AM
How is this more "real" than the ASUS PQ321Q?
Same size.
Same resolution.
Same panel.
The first real 4k monitor, nice indeed.
How is this more "real" than the ASUS PQ321Q?
Same size.
Same resolution.
Same panel.
CronoGraal
Senior Member
Posts: 4162
Joined: 2006-10-11
Senior Member
Posts: 4162
Joined: 2006-10-11
#4625451 Posted on: 07/24/2013 11:57 AM
People judge monitors by bezel designs?
nothing amazing in terms of bezel design
People judge monitors by bezel designs?
Lane
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
#4625463 Posted on: 07/24/2013 12:14 PM
Look good, i just fear the price ( > 4000$ ) .. maybe for work.
Bezel look ok lol, aluminium + black, lightly rounded, solid. Dont forget the side of the screen, 32" ... thats big.. really big ( i have a 32" LED TV here for a room, so i got it under my eyes rightg now, its really big )
No need of small bezel as you will not use this one for Eyefinity or Surround . ( and for work on 2 multile display spaces, i dont think its is a problem ).
Photos dont really give him justice..
Feet and back of the monitor look good too ( dark grey, mat paints ) .
Look good, i just fear the price ( > 4000$ ) .. maybe for work.
Bezel look ok lol, aluminium + black, lightly rounded, solid. Dont forget the side of the screen, 32" ... thats big.. really big ( i have a 32" LED TV here for a room, so i got it under my eyes rightg now, its really big )
No need of small bezel as you will not use this one for Eyefinity or Surround . ( and for work on 2 multile display spaces, i dont think its is a problem ).
Photos dont really give him justice..
Feet and back of the monitor look good too ( dark grey, mat paints ) .
SaiBork
Senior Member
Posts: 187
Joined: 2009-03-11
Senior Member
Posts: 187
Joined: 2009-03-11
#4625474 Posted on: 07/24/2013 12:55 PM
Bezels distract, so we want thin ones
Especially if you want more than 1 screen. Although, 3x 32" might be a bit much.
People judge monitors by bezel designs?
Bezels distract, so we want thin ones
Especially if you want more than 1 screen. Although, 3x 32" might be a bit much.
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 5899
Joined: 2010-10-17
Senior Member
Posts: 5899
Joined: 2010-10-17
#4625493 Posted on: 07/24/2013 01:53 PM
Want!
Want!
Darren Hodgson
Senior Member
Posts: 15833
Joined: 2004-08-18
Senior Member
Posts: 15833
Joined: 2004-08-18
#4625503 Posted on: 07/24/2013 02:24 PM
Don't want!
I watched several PC Perspective videos of 4K displays on YouTube last night and I was not impressed at all. Not with the image quality or video playback as obviously I cannot judge that even from a well-compressed 1080p video stream. No, what didn't impress me was the poor quality drivers that meant just getting an image to display correctly seemed like too much hassle and then the games themselves, because they were running effectively at the resolution of four 1920x1200 displays, were very laggy and jerky unless the settings were lowered or two or more graphics cards were used to power it. Even then having 30-40 fps in Crysis 3 is hardly impressive although I might change my mind if I saw the image quality in the flesh. I'm sure the price tag associated with such a set up would soon sober me up though.
Seems to me that 4K is being pushed out too soon as the hardware is simply not there yet, certainly not for games on a reasonable budget. It's clearly being marketed more for movies where 30 Hz panels, which cost less, are likely to appeal to more people. Even then there's no real 4K content to make it worthwhile buying now even if you can afford it. It's like 3D IMO which even now has so few BD releases and so few TV broadcasts then I doubt anyone in their right mind would upgrade their TV for that. 3D was certainly a fad and even now it is slowly decreasing in popularity (the BBC have stopped all their 3D broadcasts for example and Sky no longer promote it like they used to).
4K will hit mass market but I'm just not convinced the world needs it right now or even any time in the next five years. It's like the industry is trying to run before it can walk, constantly pushing out new display technology to 'encourage' people to upgrade even though they don't need or even want to. 1080p HDTVs have only been around 8 years or so and standard definition 480p has been around for decades before that. I think personally that 2560x1440 might have been a better target now for HDTVs as that is 'doable' on many high end PCs even with single GPUs. Maybe that wouldn't be seen as a sufficient improvement over 1920x1080 though?
Meh, sorry, I just find it hard to get excited about tech that I know means I'd have to sacrifice settings for to play games on it without spending thousands of pounds more for multi-GPU setups (which I'm not really a big fan of anyway due to driver issues).
Don't want!
I watched several PC Perspective videos of 4K displays on YouTube last night and I was not impressed at all. Not with the image quality or video playback as obviously I cannot judge that even from a well-compressed 1080p video stream. No, what didn't impress me was the poor quality drivers that meant just getting an image to display correctly seemed like too much hassle and then the games themselves, because they were running effectively at the resolution of four 1920x1200 displays, were very laggy and jerky unless the settings were lowered or two or more graphics cards were used to power it. Even then having 30-40 fps in Crysis 3 is hardly impressive although I might change my mind if I saw the image quality in the flesh. I'm sure the price tag associated with such a set up would soon sober me up though.
Seems to me that 4K is being pushed out too soon as the hardware is simply not there yet, certainly not for games on a reasonable budget. It's clearly being marketed more for movies where 30 Hz panels, which cost less, are likely to appeal to more people. Even then there's no real 4K content to make it worthwhile buying now even if you can afford it. It's like 3D IMO which even now has so few BD releases and so few TV broadcasts then I doubt anyone in their right mind would upgrade their TV for that. 3D was certainly a fad and even now it is slowly decreasing in popularity (the BBC have stopped all their 3D broadcasts for example and Sky no longer promote it like they used to).
4K will hit mass market but I'm just not convinced the world needs it right now or even any time in the next five years. It's like the industry is trying to run before it can walk, constantly pushing out new display technology to 'encourage' people to upgrade even though they don't need or even want to. 1080p HDTVs have only been around 8 years or so and standard definition 480p has been around for decades before that. I think personally that 2560x1440 might have been a better target now for HDTVs as that is 'doable' on many high end PCs even with single GPUs. Maybe that wouldn't be seen as a sufficient improvement over 1920x1080 though?
Meh, sorry, I just find it hard to get excited about tech that I know means I'd have to sacrifice settings for to play games on it without spending thousands of pounds more for multi-GPU setups (which I'm not really a big fan of anyway due to driver issues).
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 15792
Joined: 2009-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 15792
Joined: 2009-02-25
#4625576 Posted on: 07/24/2013 05:12 PM
Seems like a nice monitor though for me the Dell 3014 monitor looks like the ideal upgrade at the moment but probably something like this after that though that's several years down the line.
Seems like a nice monitor though for me the Dell 3014 monitor looks like the ideal upgrade at the moment but probably something like this after that though that's several years down the line.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9758
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 9758
Joined: 2003-05-24
#4625587 Posted on: 07/24/2013 05:45 PM
nice but that way to big for monitor as i have 32"hdtv why would i want o 32" monitor too. Though I am really interested in the response time of this "ultra" hd monitor even if 90% of all video cards wont handle them for anything other then web browsing and videos gaming can forget about unless you have one them titan card and or sli
nice but that way to big for monitor as i have 32"hdtv why would i want o 32" monitor too. Though I am really interested in the response time of this "ultra" hd monitor even if 90% of all video cards wont handle them for anything other then web browsing and videos gaming can forget about unless you have one them titan card and or sli
Omagana
Senior Member
Posts: 2532
Joined: 2009-03-24
Senior Member
Posts: 2532
Joined: 2009-03-24
#4625601 Posted on: 07/24/2013 06:25 PM
nice but that way to big for monitor as i have 32"hdtv why would i want o 32" monitor too.
PhazeDelta1
Moderator
Posts: 15616
Joined: 2010-09-12
Moderator
Posts: 15616
Joined: 2010-09-12
#4625626 Posted on: 07/24/2013 07:24 PM
You'd be surprised at the amount of bezel freaks out there..
People judge monitors by bezel designs?
You'd be surprised at the amount of bezel freaks out there..
General Stalin
Senior Member
Posts: 192
Joined: 2006-06-29
Senior Member
Posts: 192
Joined: 2006-06-29
#4626054 Posted on: 07/25/2013 02:20 PM
I'm just hoping the Ultra Sharp 30" goes down some more in price with this release
I'm just hoping the Ultra Sharp 30" goes down some more in price with this release
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9758
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 9758
Joined: 2003-05-24
#4626164 Posted on: 07/25/2013 05:58 PM
face palm your self, not every one want 32" of screen less then 2 feet from there face.
face palm your self, not every one want 32" of screen less then 2 feet from there face.
Koniakki
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15
#4626215 Posted on: 07/25/2013 08:10 PM
I would gladly do 3x 60" FHD Plasma/LED's with thin bezels..
Bezels distract, so we want thin ones Especially if you want more than 1 screen. Although, 3x 32" might be a bit much.
Especially if you want more than 1 screen. Although, 3x 32" might be a bit much.I would gladly do 3x 60" FHD Plasma/LED's with thin bezels..
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 12105
Joined: 2009-01-16
The first real 4k monitor, nice indeed.