Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
Dell introduces two new full HD gaming LCD displays with a refresh rate of 165Hz / 1ms.
Full HD gaming liquid crystal displays with a refresh rate of 165Hz and a response time of 1ms have been introduced by Dell. There are two models in total.
Display synchronization technologies AMD FreeSync Premium and NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible are also supported, and the color gamut is 99 percent of sRGB. Also included are preset mode features such as "flicker-free," which suppresses screen flicker, "Dell ComfortView Plus," which lowers blue light, "sports," "FPS," and "RPG," as well as three custom mode functions. Those who are interested in the 27-inch model should know that its body dimensions are 611 millimeters wide, 363.41 millimeters deep, 492.95 millimeters high, and it weighs 9.08 kg. The 537.8-inch model's body is 5.55 meters wide, 189.44 meters deep, 451.63 meters tall, and weighs 7.55 kilograms. Its dimensions are 537.8 meters in width, 189.44 meters depth, 451.63 meters height, and 7.55 kilograms weight. It is equipped with HDMI x2, DisplayPort1.2 x 1, and a single headphone output. The common interface may support up to four devices simultaneously.
Prices are 279 EUR for the 24" model and 349 EUR for the 27" model.
Dell introduces an LCD displays equipped with a pop-up camera and noise-cancelling microphone. - 10/15/2021 08:41 AM
The S2722DZ is a 27-inch WQHD LCD display for video conferences that has a built-in pop-up camera, a noise-cancelling microphone, and two 5-watt speakers. It is available in black or white....
Dell intros Alienware X51 - 01/18/2012 01:40 PM
What if your gaming PC comfortably fits alongside those game consoles? That's what it sounds like Dell's banking on with the Alienware X51, launching today starting at $699. At 13.5 inches high, 12.5 ...
Dell Intros UltraSharp U2412M Monitor - 07/25/2011 01:15 PM
Dell today added a nice IPS screen (color precise) towards its lineup. It's the UltraSharp U2412M monitor, intended for business users. This 24-inch monitor uses an IPS panel that provides viewing ang...
Dell Introduces Adamo Notebook - 03/18/2009 10:41 AM
Today, Dell officially introduced it's new notebook called Adamo. With its 0.65 inch profile, which Dell claims
Dell Introduces All-in-One-PC Studio One 19 - 03/13/2009 06:06 PM
Today, Dell introduced the "Studio One 19", an All-in-One-PC, in Japan. Going on sale in late March (in Japan), it features an 18.5 inch 16:9 touchscreen display, which supports a resolution...
aufkrawall2
Senior Member
Posts: 1772
Joined: 2013-08-19
Senior Member
Posts: 1772
Joined: 2013-08-19
#5986403 Posted on: 01/24/2022 08:14 PM
It is nearly the standard right now, but everything that need to be downscaled or upscaled look worse than native on it.
That's a myth, you can up- and downscale from any to any resolution you want without real issues with any half-decent scaler such as bicubic or better. At least that is true for video. For games, spatial upscalers are always bad, but you can still render at any resolution you want with TAAU and image quality just degrades gradually with lower resolution. New DLDSR also works rather well with factors 1.78x and 2.25x.
It is nearly the standard right now, but everything that need to be downscaled or upscaled look worse than native on it.
That's a myth, you can up- and downscale from any to any resolution you want without real issues with any half-decent scaler such as bicubic or better. At least that is true for video. For games, spatial upscalers are always bad, but you can still render at any resolution you want with TAAU and image quality just degrades gradually with lower resolution. New DLDSR also works rather well with factors 1.78x and 2.25x.
RavenMaster
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2009-08-19
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2009-08-19
#5986436 Posted on: 01/24/2022 10:27 PM
Dell running their own antiques road show.
Dell running their own antiques road show.
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 3395
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 3395
Joined: 2007-05-31
#5986547 Posted on: 01/25/2022 08:57 AM
It's not a myth at all, i have owned some of the best one, until i get my new 4k for home.
An image quality that just degrades gradually with lower resolution still is a degraded image and you see anytime the imperfection of the process on screen, also most game are in native HD or UHD without intermediary resolution... and so it's not ideal.
BUT it look better with those default at high refresh, than low cost 4K at 50/60 hz, low cost 4K are painfull for eyes.
AND don't forget the GPU used with the screen, it's an important point too (RX 6500 with 4K, isn't a good idea as an exemple).
That's a myth, you can up- and downscale from any to any resolution you want without real issues with any half-decent scaler such as bicubic or better. At least that is true for video. For games, spatial upscalers are always bad, but you can still render at any resolution you want with TAAU and image quality just degrades gradually with lower resolution. New DLDSR also works rather well with factors 1.78x and 2.25x.
It's not a myth at all, i have owned some of the best one, until i get my new 4k for home.
An image quality that just degrades gradually with lower resolution still is a degraded image and you see anytime the imperfection of the process on screen, also most game are in native HD or UHD without intermediary resolution... and so it's not ideal.
BUT it look better with those default at high refresh, than low cost 4K at 50/60 hz, low cost 4K are painfull for eyes.
AND don't forget the GPU used with the screen, it's an important point too (RX 6500 with 4K, isn't a good idea as an exemple).
aufkrawall2
Senior Member
Posts: 1772
Joined: 2013-08-19
Senior Member
Posts: 1772
Joined: 2013-08-19
#5986638 Posted on: 01/25/2022 03:47 PM
An image quality that just degrades gradually with lower resolution still is a degraded image and you see anytime the imperfection of the process on screen
Also true with 4k display, as you need to resort to much lower values in the first place to get a similar performance. And nearest neighbor 1080p -> 4k looks bad too vs. TAAU/DLSS.
And like I said, DLSS Quality (960p rendering) is fine in a lot of games on 1440p 27" screen, often still even better than native with regular TAA.
An image quality that just degrades gradually with lower resolution still is a degraded image and you see anytime the imperfection of the process on screen
Also true with 4k display, as you need to resort to much lower values in the first place to get a similar performance. And nearest neighbor 1080p -> 4k looks bad too vs. TAAU/DLSS.
And like I said, DLSS Quality (960p rendering) is fine in a lot of games on 1440p 27" screen, often still even better than native with regular TAA.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3395
Joined: 2007-05-31
I agree on both pro and con 1440p
It is nearly the standard right now, but everything that need to be downscaled or upscaled look worse than native on it.
But also it's better to get a 1440p at high refresh than a 4k at 50/60 hz with too much millisecond... It look better most of the time.
And it's more easy to use with the median performances, ultra overpriced GPU we can get or that we own since too long.