Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
DDR4 memory roughly 50 percent more expensive than DDR3
PC Games Hardware had a peek at prices and on average DDR4 memory is about 50 percent more expensive than DDR3 memory when comparing modules with the same capacity and frequency. The price level varies from almost 30 percent to nearly 80%, hey it's new memory.
The higher prices obviously are related to low volume sales. This is a new product series, once demand picks up then prices will go down. And actually that is expected in 2015 when Intel Skylake as a platform will be launched, these will have mainstream DDR4 memory support.
| Model | DDR3 | DDR4 | Price increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 × 4 GiByte, 1.067 MHz | 8,61/GiB | 11,13/GiB | 29,27% |
| 2 × 4 GiByte, 1.200 MHz | 8,49/GiB | 13,62/GiB | 60,42% |
| 2 × 4 GiByte, 1.333 MHz | 10,61/GiB | - | - |
| 2 × 4 GiByte, 1.400 MHz | 16,24/GiB | 29,11/GiB | 79,25% |
| 2 × 4 GiByte, 1.500 MHz | 37,49/GiB | - | - |
| 2 × 8 GiByte, 1.067 MHz | 8,43/GiB | 11,03/GiB | 30,84% |
| 2 × 8 GiByte, 1.200 MHz | 8,69/GiB | 13,12/GiB | 50,98% |
| 2 × 8 GiByte, 1.333 MHz | 9,93/GiB | - | - |
| 2 × 8 GiByte, 1.400 MHz | 18,74/GiB | 28,38/GiB | 51,44% |
| 2 × 8 GiByte, 1.500 MHz | 67,44/GiB | - | - |
| 4 × 8 GiByte, 1.067 MHz | 7,71/GiB | 10,78/GiB | 39,82% |
| 4 × 8 GiByte, 1.200 MHz | 8,73/GiB | 11,84/GiB | 35,62% |
| 4 × 8 GiByte, 1.333 MHz | 9,71/GiB | 15,28/GiB | 57,36% |
| 4 × 8 GiByte, 1.400 MHz | - | 29,03/GiB | - |
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 Memory reaches 4004 MHz - 09/01/2014 07:58 AM
G.SKILL International Co. Ltd., the leading high performance memory designer and manufacturer, is proud to announce breaking the DDR4 memory speed record at 4004 MHz extreme frequency....
Corsair and ASUS Create Dominator Platinum DDR4 memory kits up-to 3300 MHz - 09/01/2014 07:53 AM
Corsair and ASUS announced the availability of the Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4 memory kits in 3300 MHz, 3200 MHz and 3000 MHz speeds - the world's fastest production memory kits. Corsair develope...
Kingston teases HyperX Predator DDR4 memory - 09/01/2014 07:49 AM
HyperX announced it will demo next-generation HyperX Predator DDR4 Memory. HyperX Predator DDR4 kits will ship in September. HyperX Predator DDR4 memory is specifically designed for the next generatio...
Panram NINJA-V Series DDR4 Memory - 08/29/2014 08:37 AM
Panram Technology rely on strong R & D capabilities and solid manufacturing capability to provide customers customized design (Customize) professional Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) and Or...
ADATA Premier DDR4 Memory Modules Photos - 08/21/2014 08:59 AM
More DDR4 memory has been spotted, this time Akiba PC Watch has snagged some photos of ADATA Haswell-E HEDT ready memory. There are 4GB and 8GB modules available (thus per DIMM). The modules have
TheDeeGee
Senior Member
Posts: 7907
Joined: 2010-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 7907
Joined: 2010-08-28
#4904466 Posted on: 09/02/2014 11:32 AM
Maybe soon is a nice time to upgrade from 8GB to 16GB here ^^
Maybe soon is a nice time to upgrade from 8GB to 16GB here ^^
Netherwind
Senior Member
Posts: 8010
Joined: 2009-11-13
Senior Member
Posts: 8010
Joined: 2009-11-13
#4904476 Posted on: 09/02/2014 11:43 AM
Prices will drop eventually, that's a fact (I hope).
Prices will drop eventually, that's a fact (I hope).
SSD_PRO
Senior Member
Posts: 180
Joined: 2013-02-07
Senior Member
Posts: 180
Joined: 2013-02-07
#4904632 Posted on: 09/02/2014 04:14 PM
DDR4 right now is a disappointment for a gamer. Currently the most common speed of DDR4 is 2133 or 2400, with the bulk of kits available at those speeds. Those kits have staggering CAS latency of 15+. Right now the most common speed of DDR3 is tough to determine, with a bulk of kits at 1600, the next most common being 2133 followed by 1866. Take 1866 just for comparison, since it is nearly universally XMP compatible with Z77, X79, Z87, Z97, and AM3+ FX chipsets. The CAS latency ranges from 8-10 and the price is 50% or less of similar DDR4 kits.
Benchmarks across almost every site shows X99 only offering modest gains to those using 3+ gfx cards. 2 cards on a Z97 (2 cards @ PCIe 3.0 x8 link) system will net you better performance and less latency than X99 systems at half the cost. X99 really carved a niche and that isn't for gamers IMO.
Back in the day X58 was the platform for a gamer, X79 still somewhat if you forgive the shortcomings and feature lagging behind the mainstream chipsets, but X99 is really moving more toward the niche workstation professional user and less the enthusiast leisure user. I seem to be in the minority but this new feature rich chipset + more core lower frequency processor combo looks disappointing.
DDR4 right now is a disappointment for a gamer. Currently the most common speed of DDR4 is 2133 or 2400, with the bulk of kits available at those speeds. Those kits have staggering CAS latency of 15+. Right now the most common speed of DDR3 is tough to determine, with a bulk of kits at 1600, the next most common being 2133 followed by 1866. Take 1866 just for comparison, since it is nearly universally XMP compatible with Z77, X79, Z87, Z97, and AM3+ FX chipsets. The CAS latency ranges from 8-10 and the price is 50% or less of similar DDR4 kits.
Benchmarks across almost every site shows X99 only offering modest gains to those using 3+ gfx cards. 2 cards on a Z97 (2 cards @ PCIe 3.0 x8 link) system will net you better performance and less latency than X99 systems at half the cost. X99 really carved a niche and that isn't for gamers IMO.
Back in the day X58 was the platform for a gamer, X79 still somewhat if you forgive the shortcomings and feature lagging behind the mainstream chipsets, but X99 is really moving more toward the niche workstation professional user and less the enthusiast leisure user. I seem to be in the minority but this new feature rich chipset + more core lower frequency processor combo looks disappointing.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 13752
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 13752
Joined: 2004-05-16
#4904640 Posted on: 09/02/2014 04:25 PM
Well I mean we have one consumer level CPU lineup that supports DDR4 and it's an enthusiast lineup with high pricing and little to no benefit in mainstream performance. Unless Skylake brings some decent performance gains I can't even see that bringing prices down. Very few people are going to want to drop $500-600 on 10% performance gains.
Well I mean we have one consumer level CPU lineup that supports DDR4 and it's an enthusiast lineup with high pricing and little to no benefit in mainstream performance. Unless Skylake brings some decent performance gains I can't even see that bringing prices down. Very few people are going to want to drop $500-600 on 10% performance gains.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11253
Joined: 2004-05-10
Still ends up way cheaper than when DDR2 was introduced. Recall paying $200 for 2 x 1gb DDR2 sticks back in 2006.