Beelink SER6 (Ryzen 9 6800H) mini PC review
Be Quiet! Pure Power 12 M - 850W ATX 3.0 PSU review
Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
CPU-Z scores Intel Core i7-12700K at over 800 points.
Intel's i7-12900K (16 cores/24 threads) has fewer cores. This is evident in the leaked benchmark's multi-threaded performance. @TUM APISAK submitted a new CPU-Z screenshot, showing the CPU scored over 800 points in a single-threaded test.
The screenshot provides no information about CPU specs, such as overclocking or platform modifications. It's also uncertain whether DDR4 or DDR5 memory was used. Other CPUs in the CPU-Z test can't climb past 682 points in an official benchmark, although overclocking makes this possible.
On October 28th, Intel will likely announce six SKUs, including 12900K, 12700K, and 12600K SKUs with and without integrated graphics. This is a first power state and does not necessarily represent the processor's actual power usage (such as PL2 state).
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X Benchmarks and CPU-Z Screenshots (32-cores) - 06/19/2018 08:59 PM
Over at Computex AMD announced and demonstrated a 32-core Ryzen Threadripper processor. Things take a new turn today, as the first results of this CPU have leaked onto the web, though HKEPC, an Asia b...
12 Core Core i9-7920X CPU-Z Screenshot Surfaces and Shows Specs - 07/26/2017 08:59 AM
Last week we already reported that Intels 12-core Intel Core i9 7920X will get a 400 MHz slower base-clock compared to the 10-core 7900X, that information is now confirmed with a leaked CPU-Z screens...
Intel Coffee Lake 6-core CPU-Z screenshot Surfaces - 07/22/2017 09:27 AM
Leave it to Asia bsaed websites to leak stuff, a fist CPU-Z screenshot of an Intel Coffee Lake six-core processor just surfaced on the web and looking at the hardware registers, it shows is indeed is ...
Fediuld
Senior Member
Posts: 767
Joined: 2016-10-04
Senior Member
Posts: 767
Joined: 2016-10-04
#5953871 Posted on: 10/10/2021 08:23 AM
Some better cooling needed!
(his cooler must be crap though, DH15 keeps 220W at 80C)
Consumption wise is as expected since it's an AVX2 bench.
My 9900K goes to 220W too in the same test.
7316
108C!!!!!!
Gents we have another Thunderbird 1.4Ghz coming.... :p
Get ready to migrate to Antarctica.
Some better cooling needed!
(his cooler must be crap though, DH15 keeps 220W at 80C)
Consumption wise is as expected since it's an AVX2 bench.
My 9900K goes to 220W too in the same test.
7316
108C!!!!!!
Gents we have another Thunderbird 1.4Ghz coming.... :p
Get ready to migrate to Antarctica.
haste
Senior Member
Posts: 2083
Joined: 2006-09-30
Senior Member
Posts: 2083
Joined: 2006-09-30
#5953876 Posted on: 10/10/2021 09:04 AM
I really hope that is true, but in either way... 260W is just too much for a CPU. Even my GPU consumes less. If it was 160W as peak consumption, I'd say fine... but 260W is a no-go for me.
IIRC, that person said in chinese that he was using a "tower cooler" without a mounting mechanism (because it didn't fit 1700).
I really hope that is true, but in either way... 260W is just too much for a CPU. Even my GPU consumes less. If it was 160W as peak consumption, I'd say fine... but 260W is a no-go for me.
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 5362
Joined: 2006-12-22
Senior Member
Posts: 5362
Joined: 2006-12-22
#5953880 Posted on: 10/10/2021 09:54 AM
Just check how many dx11 games you have.
Just finished days gone, cpu limited dx11
. I think more than half of new titles are cpu limited at some point .
Sounds to me like that's a problem with BF2042 rather than the hardware. Who in their right mind designs a CPU bound game in 2021?
Just check how many dx11 games you have.
Just finished days gone, cpu limited dx11
. I think more than half of new titles are cpu limited at some point .
tty8k
Senior Member
Posts: 1052
Joined: 2011-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1052
Joined: 2011-05-02
#5953897 Posted on: 10/10/2021 12:25 PM
It should be very close to 10700k,11700k.
That power consumption is also affected by temperature, running a crap cooler doesn't help.
And by the way, that's a 12900k.
I really hope that is true, but in either way... 260W is just too much for a CPU. Even my GPU consumes less. If it was 160W as peak consumption, I'd say fine... but 260W is a no-go for me.
It should be very close to 10700k,11700k.
That power consumption is also affected by temperature, running a crap cooler doesn't help.
And by the way, that's a 12900k.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2345
Joined: 2016-01-29
alderlake is only rated for ddr5-4800 and the fastest modules you'll be able to buy at launch are going to be less than 6400mt/s , the latencies are also much higher than the ddr4 available at the similar speeds right now, you aren't gonna see much difference between high speed ddr 4 and ddr5 ,unless the workload is bandwidth bound.