G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight​ (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 processor review
CPU-Z scores Intel Core i7-12700K at over 800 points.
Intel's i7-12900K (16 cores/24 threads) has fewer cores. This is evident in the leaked benchmark's multi-threaded performance. @TUM APISAK submitted a new CPU-Z screenshot, showing the CPU scored over 800 points in a single-threaded test.
The screenshot provides no information about CPU specs, such as overclocking or platform modifications. It's also uncertain whether DDR4 or DDR5 memory was used. Other CPUs in the CPU-Z test can't climb past 682 points in an official benchmark, although overclocking makes this possible.
On October 28th, Intel will likely announce six SKUs, including 12900K, 12700K, and 12600K SKUs with and without integrated graphics. This is a first power state and does not necessarily represent the processor's actual power usage (such as PL2 state).
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X Benchmarks and CPU-Z Screenshots (32-cores) - 06/19/2018 08:59 PM
Over at Computex AMD announced and demonstrated a 32-core Ryzen Threadripper processor. Things take a new turn today, as the first results of this CPU have leaked onto the web, though HKEPC, an Asia b...
12 Core Core i9-7920X CPU-Z Screenshot Surfaces and Shows Specs - 07/26/2017 08:59 AM
Last week we already reported that Intels 12-core Intel Core i9 7920X will get a 400 MHz slower base-clock compared to the 10-core 7900X, that information is now confirmed with a leaked CPU-Z screens...
Intel Coffee Lake 6-core CPU-Z screenshot Surfaces - 07/22/2017 09:27 AM
Leave it to Asia bsaed websites to leak stuff, a fist CPU-Z screenshot of an Intel Coffee Lake six-core processor just surfaced on the web and looking at the hardware registers, it shows is indeed is ...
tty8k
Senior Member
Posts: 1044
Joined: 2011-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1044
Joined: 2011-05-02
#5953669 Posted on: 10/09/2021 05:17 PM
Some better cooling needed!
(his cooler must be shit though, DH15 keeps 220W at 80C)
Consumption wise is as expected since it's an AVX2 bench.
My 9900K goes to 220W too in the same test.
7316
Some better cooling needed!
(his cooler must be shit though, DH15 keeps 220W at 80C)
Consumption wise is as expected since it's an AVX2 bench.
My 9900K goes to 220W too in the same test.
7316
JamesSneed
Senior Member
Posts: 1651
Joined: 2017-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1651
Joined: 2017-02-14
#5953718 Posted on: 10/09/2021 07:22 PM
Question is though, do we need that additional performance?
Probably not.
I do like the idea of them slower cores for low priority tasks too.
I do not ever want innovation to stagnate. Saying we don't need the performance is short sided. While I'm pulling for AMD I want Intel back in front and then AMD leapfrogging them.
Question is though, do we need that additional performance?
Probably not.
I do like the idea of them slower cores for low priority tasks too.
I do not ever want innovation to stagnate. Saying we don't need the performance is short sided. While I'm pulling for AMD I want Intel back in front and then AMD leapfrogging them.
Mineria
Senior Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: 2007-05-05
Senior Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: 2007-05-05
#5953791 Posted on: 10/09/2021 11:24 PM
I meant it as in needing that new CPU for our machines, innovation won't stagnate because I keep my current CPU for a bit longer, lol.
We didn't see the proper reviews yet either, so most of it is just speculation for now.
I do not ever want innovation to stagnate. Saying we don't need the performance is short sided. While I'm pulling for AMD I want Intel back in front and then AMD leapfrogging them.
I meant it as in needing that new CPU for our machines, innovation won't stagnate because I keep my current CPU for a bit longer, lol.
We didn't see the proper reviews yet either, so most of it is just speculation for now.
Falkentyne
Senior Member
Posts: 537
Joined: 2001-02-27
Senior Member
Posts: 537
Joined: 2001-02-27
#5953841 Posted on: 10/10/2021 04:06 AM
Some better cooling needed!
(his cooler must be crap though, DH15 keeps 220W at 80C)
Consumption wise is as expected since it's an AVX2 bench.
My 9900K goes to 220W too in the same test.
7316
IIRC, that person said in chinese that he was using a "tower cooler" without a mounting mechanism (because it didn't fit 1700).
Looks pretty good to me in that case.
Some better cooling needed!
(his cooler must be crap though, DH15 keeps 220W at 80C)
Consumption wise is as expected since it's an AVX2 bench.
My 9900K goes to 220W too in the same test.
7316
IIRC, that person said in chinese that he was using a "tower cooler" without a mounting mechanism (because it didn't fit 1700).
Looks pretty good to me in that case.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 7411
Joined: 2006-09-24
Zen3+ if it delivers as an answer I just might buy that for my setup as I would need only a processor. This does look pretty nice.